General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
irresistablejewel
Sky News
comments
Comments by "irresistablejewel" (@irresistablejewel) on "Sky News" channel.
Previous
3
Next
...
All
@DreamyCheshire-up9rf Yes (it's America's war) and it might help if SKY stopped deleting comments and started being honest.
1
It's about $63,000,000 for an F-16 and Russia has sophisticated air defenses; while the F-35 stealth fighter ($75,000,000) can apparently be detected by both Russia and China. This could get very expensive... all this "charity".
1
Yeah! "Watch With Mother" or "Jackanory".
1
lol
1
@Joey-me1mn My my, a talking goat; a lot of talk these days; what's gnu?
1
I don't think they will, they have secured their port facilities in Crimea and have a land bridge (it's called). That's my guess. Why would they do to Ukraine what the Western interests were trying to do to them?
1
The Eastern regions (currently occupied by Russia) all voted for independence in 2014; they mostly speak Russian, so it seems abundantly clear they don't want to part of a country the Western interests claim ownership over. While looking at America: the homelessness; massive national debt; inner-city decay, who would want to join that? Ukraine (after a few financial incentives from the EU and America) broke their neutrality agreement with Russia, there's a price to pay for doing things like that (and it's not expressed in dollars).
1
I'm sure Capt Ben would agree, he's a company man; but they've found somebody better, or at least of more use. Now will he shut up?
1
@RickMylbani-n2u The list of those with motives is long; this company views fines as the cost of doing business and is wide open to accusations of fraud; that's what.
1
Yes: it is a ridiculous statement for an academic to make, the rush to accuse is rather revealing and since the UK defence secretary (Cleverly, but what's in a name?) was in Kyiv the day before I suggest, "he who smelt it dealt it". Since even the American interests aren't as accusative, I suspect they'd be content to let the UK and Norway do the talking; because as Truss told Taiwan, it's China who are the real enemy (whereas I thought it was Truss, trying to sink the UK economy; but what do I know?). Propaganda when I see it, that's all...
1
The first three aren't interested in those Western interests (nothing in it for them) and the other is largely American, so isn't a united anything.
1
@RaRa-eu9mw That's not what the Pentagon leaks say; but I doubt that's mentioned on this channel; a number of NATO members troops are deployed there (but don't tell anyone). Phil your bot can't spell.
1
@petrciperny No public money is being exported or turned into weapons and it's America that invariably goes to war for reasons of oil. Russia wanted some distance between them and NATO/EU and that is why they are at war. All the major powers knew if Western interests kept pushing Russia would go to war; they knew that and didn't care. (It's nobody they know)
1
Who Pelosi and Biden?... Yes, for too many years... but the music is running down now... America might not be as popular as it thinks it is!? Just a thought...
1
He doesn't need to know; he's just the front man for those that own both political parties. They're the ones diverting public money, it seems charity begins at home ends up in Panama.
1
The UK still provides aid to India and China; houses economic migrants; MP's get wage rises and perks; bankers get bonuses; £3 Billion a year to the Ukrainian mob; more admirals than ships... who is Starmer trying to fool? (it's us isn't it?).
1
Charitable? The UK and American governments don't even care about their own people; just what they can get and it seems Ben gets nothing so he's a bit upset no doubt. Charity.. lol.
1
The EU has already lost relatively cheap Russian: gas; oil; grain and fertilizer; another refugee crisis (after Libya) to deal with; some rogue state blew up their German/Russian pipelines; they've gifted money and "lethal aid" (offending the English language) and Russia has still managed to trash the Western corporate assets and I doubt that rebuilding contract (America awarded to itself) will be worth much. America isn't paying 90% or anything like it; it's clearing out old weapons stock; a select few are moving money offshore, while their plan to separate the EU and Russia, sell them LPG and grain seems to have worked fairly well. America accusing others of freeloading; that's pretty rich; it's usually: oil; money or opium they are after; don't care about people (even their own living on the street) and appear morally and financially bankrupt. Let's see if the American "chickenhawks" (want war; won't go) can start WW3 in Europe, shall we? Late for the first two; they'll be bang on time for the third if this carries on... Yeah! Send more money, system working (NOT!). Europe knows what an angry Russia can do.
1
They're being "mothballed", but aircraft carriers are vulnerable to advances in missile technology; so maybe one could be a hotel.
1
@alainpannetier2543 The quality was very poor (various countries wouldn't unload Ukrainian grain), it wasn't even fit for animal feed they said.
1
@Mrjffjjfhfucuc Russia already said they would put nuclear missiles on that border if Finland joins NATO; it's no secret and this proposal to give Ukraine $40 Billion, is it not clear America wants war with Russia. As for Johnson (of the UK) there has to be something in it for him £££; he doesn't care a jot about his own citizens; that's rather obvious. I don't think Germany will allow America to start WW3 in Europe; America's invasions of Iraq and Libya were a failure, maybe if they jailed a couple of the arms and oil lobby they wouldn't be shelling so much money out on lost causes. I trust Putin and Xi far more than Biden or Johnson; the American media are totally corrupt, so where's my lethal aid?... and what has Ukraine ever done for us? America needs war, it's their business model; civilians pay for it all... $40 Billion indeed?!
1
With odds of a Tory majority on July 4th being 125-1; haven't they done well? I'm no fan of Farage, but it's time NATO and the EU took responsibility for the games they play; so I think he's correct and this Tory administration are the wrong people, not just for trying to lead the UK into war with Russia (over Ukraine??). Everything they touch seems to turn to dust...
1
Not me; or the lactose intolerant, your problem is your problem.
1
The grain deal was not abruptly cancelled by Russia last month, the girl with the large breasts is completely wrong; it expired and Russia won't renew it. Russia claims grain ships are being used to bring in Western weapons; the grain corridor is being used to launch attacks on Crimea; then they wrecked the Odessa port facilities. Western claims that this will leave African people to starve seems dubious if 97% of the grain went to the EU, so that would be two lies from SKY. "Could Russia interrupt grain exports from Ukraine via the Black Sea?" They just have! (three strikes, yerrr out!) This channel should really be called SLY news.
1
Honest reporting is what the (mainly American) news media need; but don't expect that, the money's "so good" (They aren't paying people $50 million a year just to read an auto-cue).
1
It's simple enough to explain: Russia fired a warning shot at a British spy-plane operating over the Black Sea; Ben Wallace (the defense secretary) kept that quiet, for a few weeks, until there was a lull in the conflict and after he received instructions from America in that "emergency meeting" he went over to attend. Russia claims it was a technical malfunction, those in the know understand that doesn't happen and we can assume the next technical malfunction will be right up the tail-pipe. Just like the battleship full of journalists heading toward Crimea; we should not allow America to use the UK as a stool-pigeon; Russia is deadly serious and while the Western (mainly American) media lays it on a bit thick about the damage to the Russian economy, just take a look at ours. Yet another PM after the last nearly sunk the UK economy and blew up the pension funds; more money from the Tory "magic money tree" going who knows where and Russia already stated that in their opinion if they had destroyed a British warship in the Black Sea it would be unlikely that would start WW3. Now America wants to involve Iran; antagonize China and let's not forget this Ukrainian matter could have been avoided but the West wants to expand and they don't care who gets hurt (never did). Send more money Ukraine says; vote for Boris Johnson, Ukraine says; Ukraine will defeat Russia, Ukraine says... ever felt we are not being told the truth?
1
Wake up; the Western globalists are already heavily invested; diverting billions in public money (to one of the most corrupt countries in Eastern Europe); I smell "kickbacks" galore.
1
EU buys oil products from India now.
1
Based on Ukrainian figures, is it?
1
@arnoldstang7997 Yes Ben's off to fight the Russians (I'm not going) still waiting for my "lethal aid".
1
SKY appear to be the enemy within; never saw a war they didn't like; a hateful organisation.
1
Yes; because: Monsanto; Cargill and Blackrock don't have an army (this time)
1
Correction. For Russia read "The whole Western economy".
1
@RaRa-eu9mw No, actually they are not: America needs to agree a new "debt ceiling"soon; another bank collapse, the UK experiencing a "cost of living crisis"... anyway not all growth is a good thing. Russia isn't in a recession either; moved to #8 (debt to GDP); just crossed off $30 billion in African debt; now with the 11th round of EU sanctions it seems to have also annoyed China, who have promised to respond. Entertaining stuff it is too... but we should know by now the media makes stuff up... easier than working it is...
1
No silly; if Poland is patient they'll get land in Western Ukraine (that's why they are so keen to support the globalists). They were never part of USSR.
1
@laserdolphin6483 What's that meant to mean? Bakhmut is marked in red now; Bell wants to talk about other things and maybe Russian troops don't like Piutin there (bitchy). The Pentagon leaks seem to contradict Bell, funny that...
1
Throwing people out of windows (defenestration) was more a Czech thing; poisoning with radio-active substances was more a Ukrainian/Georgian mafia thing (in Moscow of the 90's); the Soviet method (in the Stalin era) was far less dramatic, usually a single bullet. Lucky that footage was available so quickly or people might speculate...
1
They've done enough...
1
@TheStargoose It was always going to take longer to burn all those American dollars... got any more? (Btw It was Gen Milley that said 3 days to Kyiv; but he's gone now)
1
Good one! Hahaha
1
@karlxx13 That's pretty much how I see it, too (although he may have got beaten up) and so I question Faltner's honesty. I don't regard him, or Cleverly, as very cleverly.
1
Then they don't need our money.
1
Due in May, but elections currently suspended there.
1
@maigepresents5840 His five year term in office officially ends at midnight on 21st of May, according to Mercouris of "The Duran", I don't see why he would lie and anyway other sources seem to agree; although "The Kyiv Independent" just say his term ends in May. After that, according to TASS, he can't legitimately extend his term; but Parliament (The Verkhovna Rada) can; which I assume is true.. "The Kyiv Independent" say that "under Ukraine's Constitution, elections are prohibited while the country is under martial law". They offer various polls and suggestions... plus his claim that, "most Ukrainians think such a vote would be "dangerous and meaningless" in wartime". Since the main opposition party is under detention; it seems martial law has been declared; I suggest (as is common here in UK and America) that rules are just made up as they go along. He just needs to think up another excuse on May 21st, which I assume he will.
1
It'll get tougher to pronounce as it moves towards Novapropakyivka... So officially our tart of a government are sending billions to the back of beyond (sorry Novapropakyivka)... renting plague infested (allegedly) barges @ 1.6 billion (a billion, what a thousand million??) Money to burn...
1
@bnarit No, China already told America, "don't try and involve us in American power games"; the neo-Cons obviously don't listen, so in a choice between Russia or America it's easy for China. Everything America touches turns to dust; it's clear China is next on the neo-Con hit list (Taiwan is the excuse); largely because America owes China a lot of money. This is why America is so invested in trying to start WW3 in Europe, they can't inflate away $32 Trillion, so it's war (and whoever blew up Nordstream2 want a really big war. It's almost amusing watching a young whelp of a country trying to lecture ancient cultures; the Chinese wrote the book on war; Russia can deploy 20-25 Million troops; now all we need is Germany and it's ready to go... Best not to try putting words in Xi's mouth; the Chinese don't tolerate loss of face; the msm can easily start a war that way. Words have consequences.
1
Yeah, they worked... lol!
1
I agree; it's still spinning... 2000 tanks destroyed he claims while the Ukrainian ministry claims 4506 (and that's a lot of tanks); I've seen no evidence of this.
1
@ianhamilton3113 No that's NATO strategy ("shock and awe"; 100+ cruise missiles into Tripoli; "oil for food" program; blockading medical supplies... etc). Russia is destroying Ukrainian infrastructure; so companies like Monsanto (with their bio-labs) lose their investment; Western weapons shipments; while millions of Ukrainians (who are aware what Russia can do) have left the country. These Western interests don't care about people (never did) it's all about American economic interest (oil; money; opium); they don't even care about their own people (look at the homelessness; poverty; addiction visible in America). Sending money to corrupt countries, they'll get their "cut"; but their crocodile tears about civilians, are just that. Now a word from our sponsor... send more money!
1
@ianc7866 That is not a quote from Stalin.
1
Previous
3
Next
...
All