Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "World History" channel.

They would be the next generation of jews that could try to get revenge for their murdered parents, and if they did breed like rabbits then would the job the nazis had done been in vain. So the nazis could not spare their lives, but on the contrary was they the most important targets for the nazi regime. Unsurprisingly did 90% of all jewish childs in Europe die as a result. I do agree with you their death was horrible. And it says a lot about what kind of people the nazis were that murdered them. But at the same time I will not wanna take away all the injustices with all other crimes the nazis did. Couldn't they have just have spared the lives of the elderly people who would die one day anyways? Why kill many innocent beautiful women or young men who had their entire lives ahead of them? This stupid waste of killing doctors, engineers, and scientists who could have helped to create a better world or could have helped the Germans win the war. This was just evil and stupid. And killing people with gas in itself sounds like an extremely nasty method of dying. It would have been more humane with bullets or starvation I think.
1
The gas chambers were not a secret. Some nazi-commendants even openly told the newly arrived prisoners about their future fate. So a SS man would of course know what the place was all about.
1
The russians did let many genocidal scumbags get free as well. And they even opened up the Buchenwald concentration camp after the war so they could kill political prisoners inside of it - just like the nazis had done before them.
1
Aside from the fact that the Waffen-SS were involved in many warcrimes themselves like the Oradour-sur-Glane, Malmedy, and the Dirlewanger brigade happily murdered jews as well as all those Waffen-SS units who killed jews during the Warsaw ghetto uprising.
1
davidgaine4697 Nope is slavery not effiecent in a modern economy. Especially not when you take doctors, scientists and engineers and force them to do dumb low skilled manual labor instead, as the germans did. And for the most part were the nazis not even interested in anything useful with their slaves. After all women, children, elderly and sick had been killed - then it was the male factory workers turn to be gassed. And this despite it did harm armaments production - so the holocaust did not make much sense. And a typical day at a death camp was just to stand up for hours and standing still and doing nothing - for hours. And other times were jews forced to dig a hole in the ground for half the day, and then the last half of the day they had to fill the hole they have just dug. So it was much pointless activities like that. And dragging dead bodies out of a gas chamber did not help the german war effort by much. That did not have Germany any more tanks or planes. And likewise did slavery not make the west rich, as most of that wealth was created by other means. Marx claimed that the slavery created the funds for the industrial revolution - which is a statement he pulled out from his ass, as there is nothing to back that up. At best could it only provide a fraction of that money that was pumped into industrial investments in the 1700s and 1800s. And most wealth did come from europe itself. Slavery as a system do not provide much incentives for workers to work hard -but rather do workers rather want to try to get away with cheating and doing as little work as possible. And there is not much incentive for increasing productivity either. And as I said earlier, taking high skilled and highly productive workers or highly educated men and force them to do stupid simple tasks is economically unwise and stupid. If a worker can produce 100 dollars of value per workhour and you put him into a job where he only only produces 5 dollars per workhour - then will your economy lose much in productivity. And you will have wasted hours that society have invested in learning these workers a high skilled job that they are not doing anymore. So slavery is a stupid and outdated system.
1
@sandrakostic5998 I have actually studied feminism at one SJW-clown university (Södertörns University) so I feel confident that I know what I am talking about. You speak as if you hold the true version of feminism in your hands - but you don't. No one holds the monopoly over deciding what feminism is - and neither do you. A normal person would not be offended by what I said. But then we have people like you... As I sees it are the only people who gets offended of what I said idiots. Because it is appearant that many women are not good people. The woman in this video is one example of this. I guess most people think I sound like Captain Obvious when I says this, and that is because for normal people this is obvious. But for some types of feminists its not for some reason. They are lying to themselves that only men could be evil, and that all women are good somehow. Women and men are almost completly similiar in most ways, for good and bad. Nor do I believe in male Conservatives or female feminists that makes baseless claims that men and women are biologically programmed for this or that.. as if all men are born socially competent, and women are born with the skill how to know how to breastfeed a baby. But the truth is that most of that is not true. Many men are just as socially awkward and introverted as many women, and neither women or their babies knows how do a breastfeeding, but instead do the baby accidentally bite the mother at the first times, and the mother gets red over all the chest from all bites and inflammation, and it is an unpleasant experience for many that they had no knowledge about before or gotten any pre-warning about. Personally do I think that feminism is an useless and outdated concept in the western world. Instead of focusing on gaining undeserved priviligies for one group of people and discriminate and hate another group of people just because of the way they were born... do I think it is more productive to have an ideology that is promoting a society witout priviligies and which treats everyone equally. For that reason do I not consider feminists as my allies, but as my political enemies. Feminists don't care that most homeless are men, or that most suicides are done by men, nor do they care that men gets harder sentences for the same crimes as women, nor do they care that men do not automatically gets recognized as a parent of their own child the same moment as when it is born - like women are here in Sweden. So I like women, but I do not like feminists. I like equality and a better life for both genders, unlike feminists.
1
90% of the people who were killed in the holocaust were jews. The prisoners that were worst treated in the concentration camps were jews, and especially polish jews.
1
Otto Ohlendorf along with Odilo Globocnik are two huge names in the holocaust which I think seldom gets the attention that they deserve. Both were evil scumbags responsible for the deaths of millions. So I think they deserve the same attention as Himmler, Heydrich, Eichmann, Mengele, Höss and Amon Gött.
1
@lorenzbroll101 Many of them were. However the nazis 30.000 established camps. So I guess that the needed at least say 200.000 men to guard those. And they also needed lots of men in the Einsatzgruppen driving around in russia, Ukraine and the Baltics and taking all jews to a forest where they would be forced to dig their own graves, before their lives were taken away. And then there was lots of men working in other ways to help the nazis kill millions of people - like people in the secret police who collected information so jewish families could be found in their hiding places and arrested, train drivers that transported the jews to the camps, the salesmen who gave the nazis gas and ovens they knew would be used for horrible things. There was men in the military that provided landmines, barbed wire and machine guns for the camps. There was diplomats talking to other countries and negotiating with them so they would hand over all their jews to the germans. All in all would I not be surprised if many hundreds of thousands of Germans were involved in this death machinery. And I do not think that all of them were psychopaths. Many were just idiots, cowards and men without moral compass, and cowards who just obeyed orders. Men motivated by fear, peer pressure, greed for stealing belongings from their victims, men who wanted to make career in the nazi state's hierarchy, men and women driven by hatred... And the nazis also put much effort in trying to relieve their killers counciousness, by doing their best to tell them that they were just following orders, and therefore had no personal responsability.
1
I hope that Trump forces China to apologize for the attack on Pearl Harbor if he become elected president
1
His love for Hitler died when he attacked his friends in the army. And he leaked out the information about the invasion of russia to the british - long before german military defeats made it seem less likely germany would win the war.
1
Unsubbed bye.
1
I got my comment deleted despite I did not say anything illegal. And just because I do not endorse homosexuality you censor me? I guess that this makes you more nazi than what I am. So far I have censored no one.
1
@binxboi7156 A Putler bot probably
1
Only 2 persons surived Belzec while something like 200.000 - 600.000 people died there. And the same is true for Chelmno where also only 2 people survived. So it is very scary. The nazis nearly succeded with killing off all witnesses, and they burned all dead bodies into ashes so no evidence of their crimes would be found. And then that ash was used as fertiliser to grow pine trees in places like Sobibor so no one would find out that this place once was a place of tears, suffering and death of innocent people. Imagine if the nazis had access to drones, CCTV cameras, infrared cameras, motion detectors and so on... then there would not even have been a 1 chance out of 300.000 to survive. And no witnesses would have survived. And even if say only 1 or 2 jews would had survived the holocaust - then there is a high risk that people would never have believed them when they told about the horrible things they had seen and been through.
1
The jews were lied to and told they were going to take a shower. There were no guy saying to them "hey guys, we want to push you on to train that will take you to your killing location. And there will you suffer a terrible death inside a gas chamber". Most jews did not know that the nazis planned to kill them until it was too late to resist. So your comment is filled with stupid ignorance 🙄 And besides what did the armed jews in the Warsaw ghetto accomplish? - Nothing. You cannot use old rifles and a few handguns to take on an entire professional army with tanks, artillery and aircrafts and an entire state machinery backing it. How dumb does one have to be to believe that? If the mighty British empire, France and Soviet Russia could not do well against Hitlers armies despite millions of trained soldiers, and thousands of tanks, planes, field guns, and warships.... then what chances would the jews have? - a bunch of jews consisting of undernourished, weak, and sick people with no military training. They did not have any heavy equipment, and the jews from all different countries in Europe did not even speak the same language. And elderly, children, disabled and women are not exactly first class frontline troops material. One can say that the holocaust really begun in january 1942, and 80% of all jews who died in the holocaust died before the end of that year. With other words there was no way the allies could have invaded Germany and ended the war earlier either. On the contrary - the nazis stood at the height of their power in 1942 and 95% of Stalingrad had fallen into German hands. Polands jewish population was dying off so fast that there were realisticly no time for them to realize that their people were being murdered when they were transported by train to an unknown destination to never be seen again. And once horrible rumours reached the jewish community, they were so horrible that most people could not believe them at first. But as more and more people got killed, many more people grew suspicious and tried to resist the nazis. And the respons from the nazis were brutal. Unfortunatly for the jews were they now too few to cause any serious problems to the Germans. So 98% of all jews in Poland could easily get murdered by the Germans. Indeed most death camps in Poland was already being closed down in 1943, because there was no longer any jews left to kill. And the war would continue for another two years. The biggest problem for the jews was never the lack of weapons. But the lack of information. Most people did never know that the nazis planned to kill their people before it was too late. Had they known that then they would have tried to flee to Israel or other places if they could.
1
This was not an open speech. Himmler held this speech only for SS members and no one else was allowed to know about it. But it was kind of an open secret what Germany was doing. When you wipe out something like 10-14 million people you have to involve so many soldiers that it becomes impossible to keep everything secret. Nazi-Germany had tens of thousands of concentration camps, so many guards was of course needed. And people involved in all train transports, all people selling poison gas, the companies building cremation ovens, and companies rebuilding trucks so the exhaust gas could be pumped into the back of the truck... all those people also probably knew that the german state was killing people. But few people probably knew exactly how many millions that lost their lives, and under what horrible circumstances. However even the nazi state needed support from the German people. The German peoples Rosenstrasse protests against sending jews to Auschwitz to be gassed is a clear example of this. However most Germans supported Hitler, and they knew their regime was cruel against the jews. That they enslaved them, and discriminated against them. However going the extra step an killing people by the millions was however something that many felt usure if the nazis was capable of doing. But they were. And sometimes by accident, and sometimes perhaps did the nazis leak out their true intentions to the German people to see their reaction. In a speech in 1939 did Hitler say that if another world war 2 broke out, then it would be the fault of the jews and that the jews would pay the price for it. And in another speech in 1943 in the Berliner sport palats did Goebbles during his total war speech, tell the german people that it was time to exterminate the jews. So there was always hints what the real intentions of the regime was.
1
Of course you socialist green muppets thinks so.
1