Comments by "ItCouldBe Lupus" (@itcouldbelupus2842) on "Hakim"
channel.
-
@futurewarlord99 Also no, efficiency is not the goal of Capitalist Industry, profit is.
Efficiency is only a goal when it serves to increase profits, but it doesn't always.
I think my example of food distribution made that pretty clear.
I have been talking about industry being sustainable anyway, efficiency isn't the main point, and you're the one who brought it up.
Industry is unsustainable and that is the main issue.
I think a socialist government has a better chance of distributing food based on need on account of a Socialist governments priorities being the wellbeing of the people, evidenced by the quality of life improving in every country that elects a socialist government, Burkina Faso, Cuba, Vietnam, Russia. Food security is generally better in Socialist countries than in Capitalist ones.
A Capitalist neoliberal government will never eliminate world hunger because it isn't trying to, after 60 years of global capitalism that should be obvious. The goals of a neoliberal government is to serve corporate interests and let the free market solve any societal problems, under the misguided belief that valuing profit over all else will lead to economic prosperity for everyone.
But it quite obviously hasn't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@epix4300 I was talking about the Soviet union, not modern day Russia. You should slow down and read more carefully, think about what is acting being said.
My point was that Russia went from a backwards shit hole to a world superpower and their greatest time of prosperity while socialism was implemented, once the Soviet union was disbanded and Russia became a neoliberal Capitalist country everything got worse.
That is literally my point.
I'm 27 btw, and yeah I'm ignoring the Quran debate, because it's ultimately semantics, you aren't arguing against something that causes real world harm to people that you want to see stop, seems like you don't know or even care enough to learn about it, you're just deeming an old religions text evil to win a debate in a comment section. It's hyperbolic and devoid of any real world meaning, the Quran is no more evil than the bible which discuses buying, owning and beating siaves, I honestly don't care what the old book says. I care about what the actual human beings who follow the religion do, and most of them live peaceful and loving lives and don't murder anybody.
The fact that you are so determined to prove the Quran is theoretically evil but your response to the United States killing children this year is something like "oh I'll have to look into that" says so much about you.
I'd rather debate things that matter, ideas that will lead to material change to the world, making it better.
You're commenting on videos that you aren't even watching like a child, "leftist lies" "imagine being a socialist", things dripping with smug immaturity and utter ignorance.
You're damn right I'm on the far left, that's literally where all the best ideas, philosophy, science, music and art come from.
Haven't you noticed that things get better when progressives are in charge, that's when things, you know, progress.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@helldeirch No, I'm not arguing that monarchy was actually better.
But it was better for the monarchs.
Just like capitalism is better for the capitalists.
The transition wasn't from monarchy to democracy by the way, the fact that you think it was is very telling on just how uneducated you are on history.
No wonder you are so ignorant of all the successes of the USSR, history is obviously not your strong suit.
The monarchs didn't just decide one day to disband monarchy in favour of feudalism because it's better for everyone, systems of power don't automatically change because one is better than the other, we have to make it change.
So your assertion that if Socialism was better than capitalism then it would have automatically replaced it is stupid, the dominant system isn't there because it's the best system but because it serves the people in power.
There needs to be an organized movement or revolution to change a system.
And that hasn't happened yet for overthrowing capitalism.
But that doesn't prove capitalism is the best system, only that it's a difficult system to change or overthrow, because those in power have a lot of control, and they've convinced lemmings like yourself to turn your brain off and declare this system the best system because it's the one you happen to be in.
And like a lemming you posit that if there was a better system then the world would just change around you and you wouldn't have to do anything.
But that's not how the world works.
Superior systems don't just replace inferior ones if the inferior system suits the needs of those in power better than the other systems, like how monarchy suited the needs of the monarchs despite it's inferiority as a system compared to those which came after it.
We have to make things change.
Capitalism is a terrible system that benefits the few at the cost of the many.
It's better than monarchy but it isn't actually democratic, the same power structures exist, they just have different names.
Socialism is a better system, and the movement supporting it is growing.
The world needs to change and it can be better.
You can ignore all the problems in the world because the current system is working fine for you, but don't tell others they should move somewhere else because there are those of us who care about things outside of ourselves and want to change the world for the better not because it would be better for us personally, but better for everyone.
Except for the capitalists, but fuck em.
Like the monarchs who lost everything when monarchy was violently replaced with feudalism, the capitalists will have to get a real job and contribute something meaningful to society rather than living like kings because they own things and can pay other people to work for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rowmin6433 Countries fail for a myriad of different reasons, mostly through illegal CIA intervention, the fact that you don't know how any of them failed and you think all communist countries magically fail on their own show you haven't looked into it, at all. You're the one lying, you think you know everything you need to know about communism but you only know the lies you've been fed by the rich and powerful.
Everyone doesn't want to live in a free market country, the majority of people in communist countries are in favour of the system, that's why they vote for it.
Most socialist governments are elected through the democratic process, they improve the quality of life in their country, and then American tax dollars are spent undermining democracy in other countries and actively making life worse.
Look at what the US did in Chile, they overthrew the democratically elected government and installed a puppet dictatorship that killed people and favoured US hegemony over the lives of it's people.
The United States govt abd the CIA have openly admitted to interfering in Latin American countries over 50 times, they tried to assassinate Fidel Castro over 600 times, everyone knows this.
Think about it for a moment, if communism always fails then why does the United States waste billions trying to sabotage it while their own country turns to shit?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1