Comments by "ItCouldBe Lupus" (@itcouldbelupus2842) on "Hakim"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PheonixKnght But those with all the money have all the power, they never have to work a day in their life in order to be able to afford to live abd they set the prices on everything and write the laws.
Us poor people don't have a choice, pay the billionaires whatever they ask or die, those are our choices. It isn't a voluntary system, it's coercion.
It doesn't have to be like this. We have enough resources for everyone, we have enough food, we have enough houses. There is so much we could be doing and so much that needs to be fixed, there shouldn't be any homeless or unemployed people struggling to find work just so they can afford to live.
This system serves a handful of rich ghouls who have more than anyone could ever need whilst billions slave away and die in poverty.
We could build a better system, one without the ultra wealthy and the extremely poor, where we could all live decent middle class lives.
Capitalism is a terrible system that only works for a select few, that's why they've spent years trying to convince everyone that capitalism is human nature, it's natural, it's the way the world is supposed to work.
But that's a lie. A lie that serves them.
Stop being a slave and realize the rich aren't on your side, we don't have to do what they say and accept the world they built, we can change things, we can make the world better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stormy2143 Yes, the United States socialist like war economy certainly gave them an economic boom for a few decades, and with almost every country in Europe devasted by the war but the United States was left essentially untouched put them in the position of being the only remaining superpower.
The USSR still have them a run for their money for the next few decades, despite half of their countries infrastructure being destroyed in the process of defeating the Germans during the war.
That economic boom didn't last though, it never does, because capitalism is an unstable and inefficient system, there's always a boom and bust cycle.
Since the 80s the United States has been on a steady decline.
That period of time isn't proof that capitalism can be successful, but that war economies are, especially when the war is being fought in the other side of the world.
Heck, that's almost more of an argument for the benefits of socialism, because the United States didn't look like a free market Capitalist country during the war.
So capitalism can't be successful without a period of socialism to prop it up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1