Comments by "ItCouldBe Lupus" (@itcouldbelupus2842) on "Pod Save the World" channel.

  1.  @GlasPthalocyanine   @CC-hx5fz  I think longer threads get flagged, I'm not sure but I haven't been able to post the reply. You could just make a new comment on this video and I'll sort by new and reply there.
    1
  2.  @jensphiliphohmann1876  Then you have heard very wrong. That just true, literally just hysterical dear mongering from anti trans activists. Trans people have been competing in the Olympics since 2004. This moral panic about protecting women's sports is totally fabricated.
    1
  3.  @jensphiliphohmann1876  where did you hear women? The appropriate term is cisgender women by the way. Trans people have been competing in the Olympics since 2004. This moral panic about "protecting women's sports" is entirely fabricated by anti trans activists.
    1
  4.  @benjaminfranklin8412  why do trans women belong in the men's category? I'm not being misogynistic, you are.
    1
  5.  @benjaminfranklin8412  trans women are not men, not in any meaningful way whatsoever. There is no rational reason for them to compete with men, they only people who want them to are bigoted people who don't respect or understand trans people and want them to be excluded. Zero logic or empathy behind that opinion.
    1
  6.  @nickthepostpunk5766  That comment wasn't directed towards you Nick.
    1
  7.  @jensphiliphohmann1876  Do you care more about making sports fair or excluding trans people? I'm just curious what your ultimate goals are. If we were able to organise and segregate sports in a logical and rational way that allowed everyone to participate fairly would that be acceptable to you? Even if trans women were included ?
    1
  8.  @markrussell3428  Being trans isn't a delusion. There is no evidence to suggest that a trans child going through an unwanted puberty normally "works itself out" in fact the evidence shows the exact opposite. Gender confusion is not being manufactured, some people are just trans. That's it. Trans people have always existed and we've known for centuries that affirming their gender is helpful to them. No one is castrating children or rushing anything. We are just affirming their gender identity because it literally saves lives, and they deserve to be happy.
    1
  9.  @karenhoyles1700  there is clarity and zero confusion whatsoever in situations like that when someone's biological sex needs to be known. You are pretending there is confusion where there is none. If a man is assaulted he can easily say "I'm trans, I was assigned female at birth" and they know everything they need to know or can ask follow up questions. It's simple, this isn't a problem, it's the reality trans people have been living with for decades. They are more likely to be assaulted than cis people are as well. You don't need to worry about how it works, it's not relevant to your life. Just treat everyone decent regardless of how they look or what gender they are, you don't need to understand them, just be decent and leave them be, mind your own business. They already face persecution and difficulty in life, please don't add to that. Just be decent.
    1
  10.  @nickthepostpunk5766  So Nick, still championing the Cass review and believing that Autogynophillia is a thing?
    1
  11.  @nickthepostpunk5766  just wondering if you had any personal growth in the last month. Probably not considering how you ended our conversation, but I don't know, I still have some hope for you.
    1
  12.  @nickthepostpunk5766  I gave you dozens of reasons to reject the biased Cass review based on bad science written by unqualified people, I think that's why you ended our conversation with silence when you refused to address these points and kept trying to pivot. You did make an impression, we talked every day for at least a week, you gave me a master class in talking to disingenuous anti-trans activists. But yes, I did come back to dish out insults, it's not like I could come back to have a good faith conversation with you, I know you don't do those. Nice to catch up sweetie ♥️
    1
  13.  @nickthepostpunk5766  have you watched the Contrapoints video on pronouns?
    1
  14.  @karenhoyles1700  People identify as what they are, no one is identifying as something else on a whim. And it's not either, because there is more than two options. I don't agree that sex becomes meaningless because people can identify as something other than what they were assigned at birth, if this were true then it would have already happened. But even if it were true, so what? What is the repercussions of sex being meaningless in your opinion? What confuses you exactly?
    1
  15.  @karenhoyles1700  No it isn't binary.
    1
  16.  @karenhoyles1700  Sex is a spectrum, and it's something we are still learning about and developing theories on. There isn't an easy fixed number to cite, it's a developing field of science. So you're agendered then, you don't identify as a man or a woman or anything else, you just are. My sibling is also agendered, they don't identify as any specific gender, they just are. That's cool. Your anti trans rhetoric is pretty weird considering that you are also gender non-conforming, we should be allies. I don't know why anti trans activists are so obsessed with AGP and pretend that people who identify as that are a significant majority of trans women when they aren't at all. I guess it's seen as something that is easy to discredit or dismiss, I guess you can see it as just a fetish or something to be looked down on.
    1
  17. @alexbennet4195  it clearly is what buddy? Old thread, don't know what you are referring to.
    1
  18. ​ @chrisbfreelance No one is indoctrinating teens to think puberty is abnormal, that's a gross mischaracterization I don't agree with anything you've typed, it's all hateful nonsense unsupported by evidence and spread by far right sympathisers. Are you comfortable with being on the same side as skin heads when it comes to this issue? Interesting bedfellows you have
    1
  19.  @mandyharewood886  Do you realize that everything you know and believe about trans people cones from figures who hate trans people? Wonder if there's any ideology behind your "disagreeing" with trans people.
    1
  20.  @ribbrascal  you're just admitting that you're a terf now
    1
  21. ​ @ceceo9480 do you think you know enough about the topic to have these conversations?
    1
  22. The far doesn't do either of those things, but people who hate the far left always feel the need to lie about what the far left believes in and embraces for some reason
    1
  23. You clearly have A LOT against trans folks, you literally call them a cult in your following comment.
    1
  24. ​ @ribbrascal why do you hate them? What specifically?
    1
  25. ​ @collyernicholasjohn Okay, so what is your point? We should ban all trans people from public life because some of them commit crimes? Just wait until you see the stats on cis men.
    1
  26.  @KitschKiss-pi8wp  I feel like trans patients won't be stoked to have a bigoted therapist who thinks they are perverts for just existing.
    1
  27. Autogynophillia isn't a real thing
    1
  28. Is this comment for other Zionists to like?
    1
  29. The cass report has been debunked.
    1
  30.  @janebennetto5655    It's been debunked, deal with it. You have no argument
    1
  31.  @jollygoode4153  it literally has, it's a terrible study based on bad methodology and inaccurate data. Tiny sample sizes ECT. Lol, the corrupt and bigoted NHS making the system worse because of a terrible debunked study isn't the win you think it is.
    1
  32.  @jollygoode4153  After a four-year investigation, the long-awaited review into transgender children's gender identity services has been revealed to critiques of flawed methodology. The review has links to practitioners of so-called ‘conversion therapy', and deemed 98% of studies related to gender-affirming care of too low quality to do anything more that inform the synthesis (a summary, based on sources). While some recommendations have been welcomed, there are fears about suggestions to reduce access to current provisions for trans people up to the age of 25. International experts, the LGBTQIA+ sector and trans users of the services have largely decried its methodology and approach. The report also strays far beyond its scope and competence in recommending a review of adult services and in suggesting that young people ought to stay under the care of children and young people’s services until the age of 25. The latter is based on highly questionable understandings of brain development which have been repeatedly debunked as an oversimplification of the constant changes in human neurology over the course of our lives. This recommendation, especially in a context of an already broken system of care for both adults and children, has the potential to have a significant negative impact on the lives and wellbeing of trans people in the UK. Underpinning this report is the idea that being trans is an undesirable outcome rather than a natural facet of human diversity. This is clear not only from the recommendations but also from the exclusion of trans researchers from the design of the review process and the links individual members of the research team have to anti-trans groups, which the Cass team were warned about. It was revealed ahead of its release that some of those writing the report have direct links to a group that advocates for the practice of so-called ‘conversion therapy’ - something they didn't declare. Dr Hillary Cass herself met with 'Don't Say Gay' architect Ron De Santis staffers who went on to ban trans healthcare in Florida - Trans Safety Network So the report was written by people with direct links to groups that practice conversion therapy, a practice deemed to be torture by human rights groups and is outright banned in many countries. You people are the ones pretending to care about children right?
    1
  33.  @jollygoode4153    After a four-year investigation, the long-awaited review into transgender children's gender identity services has been revealed to critiques of flawed methodology. The review has links to practitioners of so-called ‘conversion therapy', and deemed 98% of studies related to gender-affirming care of too low quality to do anything more that inform the synthesis (a summary, based on sources). While some recommendations have been welcomed, there are fears about suggestions to reduce access to current provisions for trans people up to the age of 25. International experts, the LGBTQIA+ sector and trans users of the services have largely decried its methodology and approach. The report also strays far beyond its scope and competence in recommending a review of adult services and in suggesting that young people ought to stay under the care of children and young people’s services until the age of 25. The latter is based on highly questionable understandings of brain development which have been repeatedly debunked as an oversimplification of the constant changes in human neurology over the course of our lives. This recommendation, especially in a context of an already broken system of care for both adults and children, has the potential to have a significant negative impact on the lives and wellbeing of trans people in the UK. Underpinning this report is the idea that being trans is an undesirable outcome rather than a natural facet of human diversity. This is clear not only from the recommendations but also from the exclusion of trans researchers from the design of the review process and the links individual members of the research team have to anti-trans groups, which the Cass team were warned about. It was revealed ahead of its release that some of those writing the report have direct links to a group that advocates for the practice of so-called ‘conversion therapy’ - something they didn't declare. Dr Hillary Cass herself met with 'Don't Say Gay' architect Ron De Santis staffers who went on to ban trans healthcare in Florida - Trans Safety Network So the report was written by people with direct links to groups that practice conversion therapy, a practice deemed to be torture by human rights groups and is outright banned in many countries. You people are the ones pretending to care about children right?
    1
  34.  @jollygoode4153    it's been debunked and dismissed by experts. It was written by dishonest people with an anti trans agenda. Underpinning this report is the idea that being trans is an undesirable outcome rather than a natural facet of human diversity. This is clear not only from the recommendations but also from the exclusion of trans researchers from the design of the review process and the links individual members of the research team have to anti-trans groups, which the Cass team were warned about.
    1
  35.  @jollygoode4153    Did you even watch this video? They discuss the Cass review and the involvement of the NHS. Your argument that the review is validated because of the NHS making changes is invalidated considering their involvement with shaping the outcome of the review.
    1
  36. ​ @barryledgister4496 trans people don't need to explain or justify their existence to you, if you seek to learn more then go educate yourself. They were even kind enough to recommend a credible source.
    1
  37. They aren't protecting anyone. As if you lot care about protecting minors, you don't care about them unless they are a tool to hurt trans people with.
    1
  38. You're denying reality. More than two genders is a scientific and historical fact.
    1
  39. Yes, that's extremely difficult from a trans woman being in a woman's space. Couldn't be more different. Trans people are not even in the top ten threats to children and women's safety.
    1
  40. ​ @chrisbfreelance Complete misinformation. Trans kids have always occurred naturally, you cannot manufacture a trans person. Stop with the lies and the hate Chris. Why are you on the same side as the neo naat-zees?
    1
  41. ​ @littlecatfeet9064 that's just not true. Trans people have been and still are more oppressed than gay people, black trans women are most of all.
    1
  42.  @ribbrascal  what is it that they are demanding that you take do much issue with? Why do you hate trans people?
    1
  43. ​ @ambientjohnny Do you think males and females have identical brain chemistry or are they observably different under MRI scans?
    1
  44.  @ambientjohnny  so you don't think trans people exist huh?
    1
  45.  @ambientjohnny   replying here because it keeps getting deleted on the other thread.    So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and give T people no choice but to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are ✝️rans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
    1
  46.  @ambientjohnny  giving this one a rewatch myself, it's only half an hour and Neil is pretty funny. I'm perfectly happy to have a conversation with you about gender and what it is over the next few days if you would like to have a back and forth. I'm going to endeavour to try not to convince you or be antagonistic with you or try to debate my way into making you agree with me, I think just having an honest conversation about this stuff where we both share our perspective and ask questions is interesting, even if we disagree to disagree at the end of the conversation. Let's just talk man to man. I'm assuming you are man, it would be ironic for me if that assumption is incorrect. Gender and authenticity: https://youtu.be/AzH-LdH9U6I?si=v7Xh7RidQY95Eimf
    1
  47.  @ambientjohnny  it's interesting how you didn't reply to me when I tried to get real and have an honest conversation about a complicated topic.
    1
  48.  @ambientjohnny  Well that's fine, you just asked me a question and I responded and invited you to have a conversation with me about it and share your perspective. I don't mind if you don't want to, I just thought you might want to discuss the topic of gender since you asked me what it means to be transgender and seemed to have an interesting perspective on gender yourself. There is certainly plenty to discuss but it's all good if you don't want to. Peace.
    1
  49. ​ @robertmarshall2502  This gives a good overview on how the Cass report has been completely shredded by the scientific and academic community and isn't being taken seriously by anyone who knows how to read a paper like this and discern a good one from a bad one. It wouldn't even be accepted if it was submitted as an undergraduate paper. https://youtu.be/EpPoxs70LpM?si=Xf7sOFONitVbL-ep
    1
  50. ​ @nikobellic570 trans people are not a threat to women's spaces, they need them for the exact same reasons cis women do.
    1