General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

ItCouldBe Lupus
Pod Save the World
comments

Comments by "ItCouldBe Lupus" (@itcouldbelupus2842) on "Pod Save the World" channel.

Previous
4
Next
...
All

 @littlecatfeet9064 where did you get this idea of trans the gay away?
2
 @chrisbfreelance Do you actually care about protecting children?
2
Murdering normal people? What are you talking about?
2
@collyernicholasjohn all males begin as female in the womb
2
Really curious to see if you are brave enough to answer the question about intersex babies
2
@Genius14928 the Cass report. It's a bad study based on faulty methodology and insufficient data
2
@av_oid you mean bigoted comments. Gender critical is just a euphemism for anti trans bigotry. Just like racists call themselves race realists
2
@CalamityJay-ez2mq you don't think using their platform to advocate for their community is important?
2
@CalamityJay-ez2mq But they are talking about problems that face them and all trans people in this podcast.
2
It's just a tax on young people's time, a way to exhaust them and control their lives
2
@barryledgister4496 That's just outright false that the conservative government isn't restricting trans healthcare. They are. There is a lot of literature studying this, a lot of relevant human rights and health organisations that have criticized the UK for this. The NHS isn't a leftwing organisation, it's controlled by the conservative government, it's run by right wing appointees of that government and it's been slowly gutted by conservative governments over the past few years. The Cass review doesn't hold up to scrutiny.
2
Complete nonsense unsupported by evidence or reality. They are a community, your conspiracy theory narrative to demonize and pathologize them isn't serious, you're repeating a bunch of debunked and unfounded claims.
2
@littlecatfeet9064 The Cass review was based on bad methodology. It was revealed ahead of its release that some of those writing the report have direct links to a group that advocates for the practice of so-called ‘conversion therapy’ - something they didn't declare. Dr Hillary Cass herself met with 'Don't Say Gay' architect Ron De Santis staffers who went on to ban trans healthcare in Florida - Trans Safety Network It's a bad study conducted by bigots who were dishonest about their connections to hate groups.
1
@littlecatfeet9064 it's been debunked and dismissed by experts. It was written by dishonest people with an anti trans agenda. Underpinning this report is the idea that being trans is an undesirable outcome rather than a natural facet of human diversity. This is clear not only from the recommendations but also from the exclusion of trans researchers from the design of the review process and the links individual members of the research team have to anti-trans groups, which the Cass team were warned about.
1
@littlecatfeet9064 it's been debunked and dismissed by experts. It was written by dishonest people with an anti trans agenda. Underpinning this report is the idea that being trans is an undesirable outcome rather than a natural facet of human diversity. This is clear not only from the recommendations but also from the exclusion of trans researchers from the design of the review process and the links individual members of the research team have to anti-trans groups, which the Cass team were warned about.
1
@KatalepticBoots This gives a good overview on how the Cass report has been completely shredded by the scientific and academic community and isn't being taken seriously by anyone who knows how to read a paper like this and discern a good one from a bad one. It wouldn't even be accepted if it was submitted as an undergraduate paper. https://youtu.be/EpPoxs70LpM?si=Xf7sOFONitVbL-ep
1
@robertmarshall2502 This gives a good overview on how the Cass report has been completely shredded by the scientific and academic community and isn't being taken seriously by anyone who knows how to read a paper like this and discern a good one from a bad one. It wouldn't even be accepted if it was submitted as an undergraduate paper. https://youtu.be/EpPoxs70LpM?si=Xf7sOFONitVbL-ep
1
@KatalepticBoots This gives a good overview on how the Cass report has been completely shredded by the scientific and academic community and isn't being taken seriously by anyone who knows how to read a paper like this and discern a good one from a bad one. It wouldn't even be accepted if it was submitted as an undergraduate paper. https://youtu.be/EpPoxs70LpM?si=Xf7sOFONitVbL-ep
1
@KatalepticBoots This gives a good overview on how the Cass report has been completely shredded by the scientific and academic community and isn't being taken seriously by anyone who knows how to read a paper like this and discern a good one from a bad one. It wouldn't even be accepted if it was submitted as an undergraduate paper. https://youtu.be/EpPoxs70LpM?si=Xf7sOFONitVbL-ep
1
@chrisbfreelance They haven't made that up. Have you not noticed how anti trans the UK government and media have become? Do you not know that hate speech and hate crime against trans people is on the rise?
1
 @brendadarling7743 Why are you against trans people? What reason specifically?
1
 @mm5478 Even if something is a problem in the west it's still a valid problem. Don't you think trans people deserve equal treatment in the healthcare system?
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 trans people aren't infringing in the human rights of women and children. They are allies, they are attacked and abused by men for the same reasons, just more often. Trans people are statistically more likely to be the victims of violence than the. Perpetrators. You're pushing an anti human ideology that encourages violence toward them, that's what you mean by resist.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 well at least you are consistent with intersex children unlike most people who "disagree" with trans people. What do you think about the Cass review excluding the many studies that show that puberty blockers are overwhelmingly helpful for the mental health of trans young people on the basis they are not double blind studies? Also, Autogynophillia isn't a thing. You shouldn't get all your information on trans people from anti trans groups. That's like getting your information on civil rights and systemic racism from The kkk.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 well at least you are consistent with intersex children unlike most people who "disagree" with trans people. What do you think about the Cass review excluding the many studies that show that puberty blockers are overwhelmingly helpful for the mental health of trans young people on the basis they are not double blind studies? Also, Autogynophillia isn't a thing. You shouldn't get all your information on trans people from anti trans groups. That's like getting your information on civil rights and systemic racism from The kkk.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Hey if you want to believe that Autogynophillia is real despite being invented by an unqualified person and not being supported by evidence then go ahead mate, but don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone other than Transphobes, the group you insist you are not a part of despite repeating many of the same things they say. I don't care about persuading you of that, just as I wouldn't care about persuading you the world is round. I'm telling you it's not a thing. Look into that and verify it yourself if you desire. So the Cass review excluded 98% of studies that show that puberty blockers have a positive effect because they were low quality, specifically because they were not double blind studies. So do you think we need some double blind studies on this to get some high quality data?
1
@ambientjohnny Except it doesn't because trans women are women who need those spaces for the exact same reas6they were created for cis women. Trans women are not a danger to cis women, they are much more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators of it. Men are the danger to female spaces, trans women are not men, they don't live as men, they don't look or act like men and they are not treated as men by society. The vast majority of women support trans people and are allies of trans women, it's literally just people who have a problem with trans people in general who are pretending to protect women only spaces. Overwhelmingly men, who have taken it upon themselves to protect women even tho no one asked them to.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Hey if you want to believe that Autogynophillia is real despite being invented by an unqualified person and not being supported by evidence then go ahead mate, but don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone other than Transphobes, the group you insist you are not a part of despite repeating many of the same things they say. I don't care about persuading you of that, just as I wouldn't care about persuading you the world is round. I'm telling you it's not a thing. Look into that and verify it yourself if you desire. So the Cass review excluded 98% of studies that show that puberty blockers have a positive effect because they were low quality, specifically because they were not double blind studies. So do you think we need some double blind studies on this to get some high quality data?
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Hey if you want to believe that Autogynophillia is real despite being invented by an unqualified person and not being supported by evidence then go ahead mate, but don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone other than Transphobes, the group you insist you are not a part of despite repeating many of the same things they say. I don't care about persuading you of that, just as I wouldn't care about persuading you the world is round. I'm telling you it's not a thing. Look into that and verify it yourself if you desire. So the Cass review excluded 98% of studies that show that puberty blockers have a positive effect because they were low quality, specifically because they were not double blind studies. So do you think we need some double blind studies on this to get some high quality data?
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Hey if you want to believe that Autogyo-ect is real despite being invented by an unqualified person and not being supported by evidence then go ahead mate, but don't expect to be taken seriously by anyone other than Transph*bes, the group you insist you are not a part of despite repeating many of the same things they say. I don't care about persuading you of that, just as I wouldn't care about persuading you the world is round. I'm telling you it's not a thing. Look into that and verify it yourself if you desire. So the Cass review excluded 98% of studies that show that puberty blockers have a positive effect because they were low quality, specifically because they were not double blind studies. So do you think we need some double blind studies on this to get some high quality data?
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Look up 'international journal on transgender healthcare on the cass review', the first result by C Horton And 'What the trans on the Cass review' Those are probably the best two critiques of the review you should start with reading. These both cite evidence for many of the claims I've made here.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 Look up 'international journal on transgender healthcare on the cass review', the first result by C Horton And 'What the trans on the Cass review' Those are probably the best two critiques of the review you should start with reading. These both cite evidence for many of the things I've said here.
1
@nickthepostpunk5766 So you really think the best system is one where trans people have to beg for treatment and spend years proving that they are trans until the age of 25?
1
@ambientjohnny mate, I honestly don't think you care about women at all. It just seems like you hate trans people and are using women as human shields, pretending to care about protecting female spaces. You just don't believe trans people exist do you? You think they are dangerous despite the fact they are much more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators of it.
1
@GlasPthalocyanine I would really love to see a source for any of that information, I couldn't disagree more. Evidence that trans women demotivate cis women from participating in sports, that's a fascinating claim. Did you know that many cis women have higher levels of testosterone than trans women?
1
@ambientjohnny So if you were in charge, in an ideal world, how would you deal with trans people? What does the ideal future for solving this issue you have look like?
1
@robertmarshall2502 The UK is considered a hostile country for trans people especially for trans children (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). Trans healthcare under the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has long been criticized for causing harm to trans people, with reports of pathologization, coercion and harm in NHS healthcare services (Horton, Citation2022d, Citation2022a; Pearce, Citation2018). Since the launch of the Cass Review in 2020, the situation for trans children in the UK has continued to decline (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). In 2022 the UK Minister for Health called for clinicians to look for evidence of “what has caused children to be trans,” citing the Cass Review to claim that “identifying as trans” is likely to be a response to “child sex abuse” (Milton, Citation2022). The Cass Review was cited by the British government to justify plans to exclude trans people from legislation to ban conversion therapy (British Psychological Society, Citation2022) Despite the incredibly strict requirements for existing research to be considered in the systematic reviews, the final report trades freely in citations of poor quality or/and politically motivated work, and even incorrectly cites literature in order to support their desired outcome. The report repeatedly cites Ken Zucker (1985)[11] to support its assertions about the number of people who regret transition. Zucker is widely known for his heavily criticised claim that 80% of young people ‘desist’ from being trans, as well as his use of practices likened to conversion therapy. They back this up with Thomas Steensma’s (2013)[12] study on factors associated with desistance and persistence. Steensma has clarified publicly that the study should not be used to calculate rates of persistence or desistance[13], as its research design (aimed at studying characteristics of persisting trans patients) risks inflating the number of desisters. The Cass Report uses it to do just this several times. If I give you the titles of the papers these quotes are from will you go read them?
1
@robertmarshall2502 The UK is considered a hostile country for trans people especially for trans children (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). Trans healthcare under the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has long been criticized for causing harm to trans people, with reports of pathologization, coercion and harm in NHS healthcare services (Horton, Citation2022d, Citation2022a; Pearce, Citation2018). Since the launch of the Cass Review in 2020, the situation for trans children in the UK has continued to decline (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). In 2022 the UK Minister for Health called for clinicians to look for evidence of “what has caused children to be trans,” citing the Cass Review to claim that “identifying as trans” is likely to be a response to “child sex abuse” (Milton, Citation2022). The Cass Review was cited by the British government to justify plans to exclude trans people from legislation to ban conversion therapy (British Psychological Society, Citation2022) Despite the incredibly strict requirements for existing research to be considered in the systematic reviews, the final report trades freely in citations of poor quality or/and politically motivated work, and even incorrectly cites literature in order to support their desired outcome. The report repeatedly cites Ken Zucker (1985)[11] to support its assertions about the number of people who regret transition. Zucker is widely known for his heavily criticised claim that 80% of young people ‘desist’ from being trans, as well as his use of practices likened to conversion therapy. They back this up with Thomas Steensma’s (2013)[12] study on factors associated with desistance and persistence. Steensma has clarified publicly that the study should not be used to calculate rates of persistence or desistance[13], as its research design (aimed at studying characteristics of persisting trans patients) risks inflating the number of desisters. The Cass Report uses it to do just this several times. If I give you the titles of the papers these quotes are from will you go read them?
1
@GlasPthalocyanine You have a source for any of these claims, like cis women being demotivated to participate in sports ECT? Did you know that many cis women have higher levels of testosterone than trans women?
1
@GlasPthalocyanine You have a source for any of these claims, like cis women being demotivated to participate in sports ECT? Did you know that many cis women have higher levels of testosterone than trans women?
1
@robertmarshall2502 The UK is considered a hostile country for trans people especially for trans children (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). Trans healthcare under the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) has long been criticized for causing harm to trans people, with reports of pathologization, coercion and harm in NHS healthcare services (Horton, Citation2022d, Citation2022a; Pearce, Citation2018). Since the launch of the Cass Review in 2020, the situation for trans children in the UK has continued to decline (Madrigal-Borloz, Citation2023). In 2022 the UK Minister for Health called for clinicians to look for evidence of “what has caused children to be trans,” citing the Cass Review to claim that “identifying as trans” is likely to be a response to “child sex abuse” (Milton, Citation2022). The Cass Review was cited by the British government to justify plans to exclude trans people from legislation to ban conversion therapy (British Psychological Society, Citation2022) Despite the incredibly strict requirements for existing research to be considered in the systematic reviews, the final report trades freely in citations of poor quality or/and politically motivated work, and even incorrectly cites literature in order to support their desired outcome. The report repeatedly cites Ken Zucker (1985)[11] to support its assertions about the number of people who regret transition. Zucker is widely known for his heavily criticised claim that 80% of young people ‘desist’ from being trans, as well as his use of practices likened to conversion therapy. They back this up with Thomas Steensma’s (2013)[12] study on factors associated with desistance and persistence. Steensma has clarified publicly that the study should not be used to calculate rates of persistence or desistance[13], as its research design (aimed at studying characteristics of persisting trans patients) risks inflating the number of desisters. The Cass Report uses it to do just this several times. If I give you the titles of the papers these quotes are from will you go read them?
1
@ambientjohnny @ambientjohnny So the plan is to not let anyone transition socially or medically and put them in therapy that isn't conversion therapy, it just has the exact same goals as conversion therapy and many of the same methods? So you just don't believe trans people exist, you think every single trans person just needs psychological therapy? Feel free to explain how the therapy you're suggesting differs from conversion therapy.
1
@ambientjohnny Do you think trans people exist?
1
@ambientjohnny So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and force trans people to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are trans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
1
@ambientjohnny So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and force trans people to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are trans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
1
@ambientjohnny So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and force T people to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are trans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
1
@ambientjohnny So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and give T people no choice but to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are ✝️rans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
1
@ambientjohnny So in short, you think we should ban all forms of transitioning, social and medical, and give T people no choice but to stay in the closet or go to therapy with the end goal being to make them not think they are ✝️rans anymore? I don't want to misinterpret you.
1
@GlasPthalocyanine Trans women face the same problems as cis women, and then some. Making the world safer for trans women also makes it safer for cis women, since they are generally targeted by the same sort of people. Trans women having rights does not make cis women unsafe, they are women as well and stand in solidarity with them. Trans women are feminists and activists, they are often instrumental in fighting for things like abortion rights and improving the healthcare system for women in general. Trans women don't need to earn their rights, they deserve equal rights. That should be obvious to anyone who cares about improving human rights for women everywhere. The same groups that attack trans women also attack cis women, they aren't separate issues. They are women, an attack on their rights is also an attack on women's rights everywhere.
1
@GlasPthalocyanine They have the same problems cis women face, making the world safer for them is to the benefit of women everywhere. They are usually feminists and activists who spend much of their lives fighting for women's rights everywhere. The same people who want to restrict their lives also want to restrict the lives of cisgender women. They are allies, their interests are aligned and they are being targeted by the same groups that want to restrict things like abortion.
1

Previous
4
Next
...
All