Comments by "" (@tekannon7803) on "Lex Clips"
channel.
-
257
-
107
-
56
-
55
-
50
-
39
-
Lex, this is turning out to be one of your best interviews because you are bringing out the quality discussion Professor Peterson is capable of but rarely achieves in many interviews. It is incredible to hear Jordan Peterson pointing out that the left is doing so much to make his life miserable. I am confused; what happened to the left? The 60s revolution was all about letting people follow their hearts and to let others live free. To hear that the left has morphed into this beast that is suddenly attacking intellectuals with or without provocative ideas makes me sad, because somehow, somewhere people took a detour and ended up being worse than what the people who started left-leaning society in the first place were all about. I have heard Jordan Petersen say things that I might not agree with, but I could not imagine saying anything more than that. "Hey, I disagree with you on this subject Jordon." End of story. But no, Jordan is telling us people are so upset because of what he believes in that they are attacking him through the courts, interrupting his way of life, and even altering his professional life. This is wrong. What in the world is going on? I'll tell you what I think and you may or may not agree, but I think a lot of these people have whittled down the activities they do in their life to a minimum and suddenly when they see someone they disagree with, they make it their mission in life to silence the voices that say things they have long ago put out of their minds because it goes against what they think. They do everything in their power to shut a person down who has another visison on a topic. In the past, people on the left put people with conflicting ideas about how to live life on dedestals: think Johh Lennon, Mick Jagger, Leonard Cohen. I see people around me all the time who want to shut me down. You know who it is? It's the people who sit around all day and do nothing but smoke on their balconies or walk around the park to kill time. These are the critics who are complaining about anything they don't like. They're living in some prison in their minds.
39
-
30
-
24
-
22
-
Professor Frenkel gives us another view of the inescapable paradox we find ourselves fighting with and marveling at all of our lives. In a sense, once we first get an inkling of what time is, from that moment on, everything becomes goalposts that we must kick the ball through to get through another minute, hour, day or month and especially, a year. We see the trace of time on our faces as photos in a drawer that were forgotten, suddenly cause us to pause and hold our breath in seeing what we looked like all those years ago. It is always unkind to us as it steals our youth, robs our beauty, dulls our minds and finally kills us off with toxins that find the weakest organ of choice and transform our bodies back to dust. Time is our master, but we master time as well...
21
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
If Lex and Vitalik could please watch the Valuetainment videocast with Craig Wright and you still do not come out convinced he is the creator of Bitcoin, then he's got a date with the Academy Awards in America. Not only does he come off as the guy who invented it, but he's got the lingo. And what does he stand to gain by pretending he's the originator of Bitcoin? Lastly, do you think for one minute if Craig Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin, then wouldn't the real inventor poke his head out, or give us an undeniable sign? I don't know why this keeps going on, but please, Lex and Vitalik, why don't you invite Craig Wright on Lex's show and have Vitalik there too. Both of you could question him. Lex is a master of quality fact-getting questions, if Wright has pulled the wool over the eyes of the global population, then Lex Fridman is the man who can get him to cough up. Double that if Vitalik is along for the ride. Come on guys, get this one solved for us, would ya?
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
Lex and Randall, it is a pleasure to hear about race theory and listening in from across the world from you, I think what we have to realize is that you and I, and by that I mean, you, Lex, you, Randall, and I, all think differently! The only time I get into trouble is when I think things like, "Well, Lex would probably think this way or Randall would probably think of me like this if I said that." What am I saying? Are we not going too deep on racism or sexual orientation of people by delving into what each one of us believes about it? The thing is we are all prejudice towards certain people or ways of thinking and what I am trying to say is that we have just got to turn the page and realize that we all think in certain way and try as hard as we can not to harbor negative thoughts about anybody. I know; I know, it's too simplistic! But if we can just take down from the podium a lot of these issues that get people worked up and try to put out a message like, "Hey, we are all different and we all have bad days and above all we are human, but let's just try to put our negative thoughts on anybody out of our minds."
14
-
12
-
The thing we must never forget is that from the beginning humans have done everything. The frozen man they found in the Alps that was ambushed 5,000 years ago was found to have everything necessary to get him through the day and night. His knife was hand made and as sharp as a razor. Machines, AI, chips in our brains and the like will indeed enhance our existence, but we must never forget that when humans do something, there is that hand-made touch that is so elegant because it's imperfect. Machines are going to homogonize us to where everything will look like an alogrithym was consulted before making it. We cannnot stop the march of time, but when we see that people are more than willing to let machines do everything they can do and better, it might be a time to consider raising our children without high technology until the age of, say, 15 years old. This way the kids would have to learn to draw, paint a picture, change a tire, etcetera without anything like a robot or AI assisting them. We must not bury our natural abilities.
12
-
12
-
Randall, it is very interesting to hearing you and Lex talk, because you obviously know your subject inside and out, and Lex has become a master interviewer. What I think is very, very delicate is to go back in the heads of, say, Jefferson, Lincoln, Alexis de Tocqueville. Not because you have got it wrong in what they wrote---because they probably knew they couldn't say what they truly felt, so they adlibbed a bit. Look at it this way: less than 1% of artifacts of antiquity have survived to the present day. We try to get our heads around what Socrates thought and said and Plato and Roman Emperors and some writings have survived, but can we honestly analyze them as people correctly after centuries of time have passed? Can we honestly come up with Thomas Jefferson's actual motives and mindset with more than 2 centuries having passed? What I think we tend to forget is that there were not modern-day conveniences back in Lincoln's day and life must have had a grit and charm to it in his day that no matter how we try, we will always come up with turning Lincoln's own words to mean things that I am convinced in his time meant slightly different things. If I were President of The United States, my way of solving the race problem would probably go this way. I would say to people that everyone has to try to not think bad things of other people and when they do to try and say to yourself to avoid thinking that way. That's the end of the race problem in my mind. If people get to know themselves a little better and start to realize that when they begin to think negative things of whomever it is they find themselves in conflict with, I think the only thing we can tell them and keep telling them is to try their darndest not to let yourself think that way about other people. Now this is never ending, because every day you wake up you've got a mind garden full of weeds to pull, but it just may be the way to turn the page on the current way of looking at the problem...
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
Jocko's information about Hitler listening to his generals conflicts with several sources I have listened to. Hitler overrode his generals every step of the way and in some ways it worked out well, like invading France. But in operation Barbarosa for example, the Wehrmacht was 30 kilometers from Moscow and could have seized it easily. Hitler didn't listen to his generals and ordered them to clean up resistence that was behind the German lines. This gave Stalin time to dig in and fortify positions and bring in new troops, equipment and supplies. When the Germans had cleaned up the resistence they found two lines of defense around Moscow and because the Russian winter set in, they were never able to take their prize. Equally, Hitler refused to supply his soldiers with winter clothes--again not listening to his military chiefs--and the German soldiers suffered terribly trying to fight in the bitterly cold Russian winter. I do believe however, if General Paulus had listened to Hitler and not surrendered in Stalingrad, they could have pushed through. Paulus disobeyed direct orders and 100,000 men went off to the gullag. 95,000 troops succombed to the freezing cold weather, disease, lack of food and internment in the work camps. Stallin on the other hand let his generals call the shots all through the war, and they of course were the victors. But the truth is that there are a lot of military analysts and no one really knows all the details.
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
Lex Fridman has shown once again his uncanny ability to bring out the best in his guests, and Jared Kushner delivers some very strong arguments about how to achieve peace in the middle east. I do not have any geopolitical credentials; in fact, I do not even have a background in international affairs---I am an artist---so please bear with me in what I am about to say. What I believe is that I have a workable, long-term resolution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict that will benefit Israelis, Palestinians and the world writ large. Jared has said that he believes it is possible to have peace by various means, but he does not see the need for Gaza to be evacuated; I do. Today, war between Israel and Hamas will possibly be unleashed like never seen before and suffering and death and increased hatred between two great nations that we all know will only grow. In short; we know how this movie begins but we can only guess how it ends. But I have a peace plan. It is not going to please everyone. Here goes: Gaza must be evacuated and Palestinians relocated. Every building, structure, road and infrastructure should be bulldozed into the ground and the 145 square kilometer land area that Gaza has been should be made into a sort of Galapagos of the middle east and serve as a nature reserve for endangered species of animal, fish, plant, bird etc., on the planet. This area which is about the size of the Isle of Wight could be transformed into a nature reserve where Palestinians and Israelis could eventually work side by side in saving species from extinction and be a gift to our childrens' children as how we resolved this terrible conflict. Just let this roll around in your mind and what you will find coming into your thoughts are pleasant images instead of tragic ones. Lex, Jared in all due respect, I know this peace plan means for us to be cruel to be kind, but the Gaza strip is turning Palestinians into eternal prisoners of the human community because of the inhumane open sewer of living conditions it offers. Palestinian children are being psychologically damaged, the great Palestinian people need one patch of land to live on, and there are countries around the world who have a need for workers. China has whole cities with apartment buildings of millions of apartments empty, for example. We could at least ask them to help out in taking Palestinians leaving Gaza, same for asking Jordan for more land for the Palestinians. It may be a little early to be offering a peace plan, but what I am offering is something good to replace something very bad and it is doable. This is a holy site and what could be more appropriate for the peace plan than to make Gaza a sanctuary for every species on earth bordering on extinction? It is doable.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6