Comments by "spacetoast7" (@spacetoast7783) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1. Whether or not a fetus is viable has anything to do with an implied right to abortion.
    1
  2. ????????????????? The decision has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a fetus is a citizen. And do you think that states can't make laws against harming non-citizens?
    1
  3.  @Peasham  Who are you talking to?
    1
  4. Barring any sort of weird plea deal, no. They're distinct types of trials.
    1
  5. TBF they never really had a chance to do it.
    1
  6.  @andrewolding8747  Maybe you aren't familiar with the American system. You need at least 60 pro-abortion Senators and 218 pro-abortion House Reps and at least 1 pro-abortion President in order to pass pro-abortion legislation. When has the US had that?
    1
  7. Bring back leaded gasoline! It was abortion all along!
    1
  8. Huh? Nobody said they can't be fired for not doing their job. Nobody except the union anyway.
    1
  9. That would be a very unusual thing for a bank to do.
    1
  10. What lies are you thinking about?
    1
  11. Which countries have figured out the cure to death?
    1
  12. Clearly you DW.
    1
  13.  @67LMcC  What???? One of the two dissents was nominated by a Democrat. That's hyper-partisanship to you? You also might want to watch the video before commenting next time. They didn't rule that police can't be reprimanded for doing a bad job.
    1
  14.  @KingNerdius  Sorry, I should have specified I live in the US. Obviously your country might be different.
    1
  15.  @KingNerdius  I'm sure you are 😂
    1
  16. That's liberalism for you. They only enforce things that pass a vote.
    1
  17. Who are you talking to?????
    1
  18. Classy. This is why the left is losing.
    1
  19. It's not about what someone wrote in their diary in 1750. It's about what people have been doing for centuries before and after, and the fact that there's no explicit right to overrule that tradition.
    1
  20. What does that have to do with anything?
    1
  21. No. Did you even watch the video?
    1
  22. What other system could there possibly be? The police can't write a check to every person who's ever the victim of a crime.
    1
  23. How is that a contradiction?
    1
  24.  @gabrielleshaw4865  So it's not a contradiction then? What was the point of your comment?
    1
  25.  @gabrielleshaw4865  You don't know that lol. You think that random people entering a building with a heavily armed shooter will certainly end the conflict with just one more death?
    1
  26. I made the same mistake
    1
  27. What did SCOTUS do wrong here? Do you think that police are supposed to write a check to every person who's ever been a victim of any crime?
    1
  28. Can you share examples of the US being tariffed into oblivion without retaliation? Do those countries not tax their citizens?
    1
  29. ​ @McNoob5477 chill
    1
  30. What other system could there possibly be? Do you want to give the police so much funding that they can write checks to the victim of every crime?
    1
  31. What are you trying to communicate? Use sentences.
    1
  32. How so? Do you think that police are supposed to write a check to every person who's ever been a victim of any crime?
    1
  33. Seems like the legal system is handling him just fine. He's not getting preferential treatment from the courts.
    1
  34. Not at all. The "deeply rooted" thing is for identifying implied rights. There's an explicit provision against slavery in 13A.
    1
  35. What lie?
    1
  36.  @thomasbecker9676  Oh so you're just lying about what the video said then. Got it.
    1
  37. If that was your conclusion, then you clearly didn't watch the video.
    1
  38. 1A doesn't shield you from trespassing.
    1
  39. This ruling has absolutely nothing to do with that. Did you mean to comment on a different video?
    1
  40. They conduct search warrants, intervene in crimes, perform arrest warrants, enforce laws. Tons of stuff.
    1
  41.  @clay8546  Uh-oh. You lied about what the 26th amendment says, and even your modified version doesn't give a universal right to vote.
    1
  42. When you repeal the 14th amendment.
    1
  43. Why would they be conducting terrorism against people they like?
    1
  44. Why are you limiting English Common Law to the age of the United States?
    1
  45. You think the police should have to pay every victim of every crime?
    1
  46.  @kenny7023  Why would police ever show up to anything in your system?
    1
  47.  @kenny7023  But you just said that police have to pay every person they respond to
    1
  48.  @kenny7023  That's an impossible standard. Which jurisdictions in the world hold a third party criminally liable for a crime?
    1
  49. Huh? Nobody said you can't reprimand police who suck at their job (except the labor union).
    1
  50. I'm sure the shooter would have walked straight into a jail cell all by himself.
    1