Comments by "Xyz Same" (@xyzsame4081) on "Inside Edition" channel.

  1. 46
  2. 15
  3. 12
  4. I read an article about a suburban couple that offered reduced ! rent for one room in their house for a live-in-nanny. I think USD 150 per week (but that wasn't for a full package). They offered that on a platform with a photo of the room (of course with furniture so no place for personal belongings, it was a guest room and a double bed taking up the space). Their demands on time of being either working or at least PRESENT The night hours, in the morning, and again in the afternoon. No visitors allowed (for the safety of the children) and the live in nanny needs to have a car. (As far as I remember no offer to help with gas, insurance, etc.) Oh and nanny must have health insurance. WiFI not included (but I think they would not charge extra for electricity, heat and warm water). Nanny would need to buy her own food. Begs the question if they would have to pay for the use of the kitchen to prepare some food. In other words a "job" that requires a car but does not offer any ! wage to finance it. Hours that interfere with other jobs and also with being a college student (they have classes and exams in the morning). No social life whatsoever, and also hardly any chance to escape the delightful masters - because the nanny was supposed to be there during night. They were a) informed about the usual conditions of a live-in-nanny (I t is not domestic servants during the Dickens era) b) ripped apart along the lines of "Sure, I can't imagine anything better than raising your kids for you and paying 600 bucks per month for the privilege. I just have to figure out what other job I could get that rhymes with your demands on my time - so that I can afford that. Maybe an elderly person on SS could have afforded that. But is she has so little social life that she would accept that offer - you likely would not want her as nanny. I seem to remember that they wanted a younger person anyway.
    10
  5. 9
  6. 8
  7. 8
  8. 7
  9. She obviously was not onyl "sore", and the way to go into a stretch is to go where it is uncomfortable, and then slowly expand your limits. . Pain is a very important signal of her body, to keep her safe ! SHE must learn her limits. Her body might no be ready for that stretch. And she needs to be calm and concentrated if she pushes her limits. Not overwhelmed, in tears. No one can force her to accept pain. It is also not reasonable to force her, nor is it safe. He cannot KNOW what her body can do at the moment. He can have assumptions, what other girls could be bullied to do, and they did not get hurt (at least no immediate harm !) - but there is no sure way of knowing. The only way that is safe: SHE listening to her body. She also needs to learn that when the training goes well. So she can improve herself. A form correction that she cannot pull off by herself, after being instructed is worthless (how is she going to exercise at home ?) - even is she does not get hurt in the process. Her team and the trainer forcing her, is worthless. She needs to be shown the correct way, and if her body is not yet ready she mut apply herself to exercise a lot (at home) to expand her possibilities, and her mucles fibres and her ligaments. That needs time btw. If she does not want to do that, then they will not keep her on the team. No big deal ! If she really wants to be on the team, she will put in the long time effort, and face discomfort even light ! pain. That is not something you can or should force upon a person.
    7
  10. 7
  11. 7
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 4
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1