Comments by "Xyz Same" (@xyzsame4081) on "The Dodo" channel.

  1. 220
  2. 40
  3. 22
  4. 13
  5. the "girlfriend" reference is nonsense. Horses are deeply social beings. that friend / companion could as well have been a male. Or his mother, sister, brother. Sex only plays a role during mating season and the relationship based on that only lasts short (under 1 hour, I do not know it they mate once or twice. but it is a fling when the chances are best for her to get impregenated. A stallion in his prime will try to do every mare that is fertile in the herd). When a mare is in heat (they smell and see that) all the grown males will potentially fight over mating privileges (if they haven't found the pecking order on that), but else "boyfriend / girlfriend" or exclusivity does not come into play. There are animals that have a mate for life (geese for example or pinguins or the leading couple in a group of wolves). But with horses - a stallion will try to mate as many mares as e can, and the mares (whether they are friends with him or not) do not mind. The herd is lead by an experienced mare. So the "harem" thing only applies to mating where one or at the maximum very few stallions mate, and the rest of the males can go pound sand. The males fight for mating privileges - but that is not supposed to disrupt the herd the mothers with the foals, the already pregnant mares, .... so the males handle that among themselves and at the fringes of the goup. then he gets to have sex with a mare (or several mares) in heat - and then they return to normal to the other social relationships they have. Of course if the males notice that a mare is getting into heat they start the fighting unless one stallion already has established himselves before as the dominant male (regarding sex and only regarding sex - else the lead mare is the boss. The stallions (whether they have mating privileges or not) are also supposed to give it an extra effort if predators attack the group and flight is not an option. They herd makes a circle and all the aminmals in their prime (male or female) will be at the front and kick out. Then the higher level of aggression of males and the higher body weight is of advantage. It is possible that highly competitive but still young males leave the herd (the males are somewhat disposable, the mares and the foals are crucial for the survival of the species) - or young fighting stallions are forced out by the dominant stallion(s). either he finds some mares he can lure away from this or another herd (with fierce opposition of the leading stallion and the leading mare of course). But their survival chances are smaller, they used to be easier prey for wolves and coyotes, with horses it is "there is safety in numbers". So only the strongest and smartest males could start a new herd. Or taking over if a stallion of a group had died (could be an accident where he broke a leg, or a disease). There would be of course lower ranking males that would aim for the position and start fighting, but a strong and confident outsider could seize his chance
    10
  6. 7
  7. 6
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. horses are deeply social beings. that friend / companion could as well have been a male. Or his mother, sister, brother. Sex only plays a role during mating season and the relationship based on that only lasts short (under 1 hour, I do not know it they mate once or twice. but it is a fling when the chances are best for her to get impregenated. A stallion in his prime will try to do every mare that is fertile in the herd). When a mare is in heat (they smell and see that) all the grown males will potentially fight over mating privileges (if they haven't found the pecking order on that), but else "boyfriend / girlfriend" or exclusivity does not come into play. There are animals that have a mate for life (geese for example or pinguins or the leading couple in a group of wolves). But with horses - a stallion will try to mate as many mares as e can, and the mares (whether they are friends with him or not) do not mind. The herd is lead by an experienced mare. So the "harem" thing only applies to mating where one or at the maximum very few stallions mate, and the rest of the males can go pound sand. The males fight for mating privileges - but that is not supposed to disrupt the herd the mothers with the foals, the already pregnant mares, .... so the males handle that among themselves and at the fringes of the goup. then he gets to have sex with a mare (or several mares) in heat - and then they return to normal to the other social relationships they have. Of course if the males notice that a mare is getting into heat they start the fighting unless one stallion already has established himselves before as the dominant male (regarding sex and only regarding sex - else the lead mare is the boss. The stallions (whether they have mating privileges or not) are also supposed to give it an extra effort if predators attack the group and flight is not an option. They herd makes a circle and all the aminmals in their prime (male or female) will be at the front and kick out. Then the higher level of aggression of males and the higher body weight is of advantage. It is possible that highly competttive but still young males leave the herd (the males are somewhat disposable, the mares and the foals are crucial for the survival of the species) - or young fighting stallions are forced out by the dominant stallion(s). either he finds some mares he can lure away from this or another herd (with fierce opposition of the leading stallion and the leading mare of course). But their survival chances are smaller, they used to be easier prey for wolves and coyotes, with horses it is "there is safety in numbers". So only the strongest and smartest males could start a new herd. Or taking over if a stallion of a group had died (could be an accident where he broke a leg, or a disease). There would be of course lower ranking males that would aim for the position and start fighting, but a strong and confident outsider could seize his chance.
    3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 4 million dogs are put down in the U.S. per year. - I j ust watched a video with the dog trainer Victoria (It's the dog or me). She occasonally has a mission with an idiot that can't handle his current dog (think pitbull and the other was a doberman I think) but he refuses to neuter the male dog (which usually calms them down and also reduces cancer risk) because they want to breed later. cluless dod owners aiming for a career as backyard breeder so to speak. - She always takes them to a shelter for a reality check (incl. the chamber where they keep the euthanized dogs until the staff of the shelter can dispose of them). One staff member: The dogs give the paw, the animal trusts the humans - that give him or her the lethal injection .... They should run ads with that to deter people from getting dogs so fast. They could volunteer in shelters to see if they like walking and interacting with a dog. 70 - 80 % of dogs in the shelters are allegedly breeds that can be potentially dangerous (like pitbulls, doberman, ....) People are hesistant to adopt them. So other dogs can be placed easier, they remain. these large dogs need more space in the shelter, when they are there too long, they put them down. A lot of them end up being killed. 4 million dogs per year in the United States. If more people would know maybe the puppy mills and backyard breeders would see their biz drop. Maybe people would try to give the existing dogs a chance. I get why the large breeds are not so popular for adoption. Smaller dogs are easier to handle, they live longer, do not need as much food, are easier to keep for lower income people, they can live in an apartment as long as the owner can walk them. They do not need that much exercise, and the pure breeds from the backyard breeders thend to have health problems. And then the fear that a traumatized dog with large powerful jaws could be hard to control. A misbehaving or neurotic or snapping smaller dog is not as dangerous.
    1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. Victoria Stillwell says that millions of dogs are put down every year in the U.S. - many of them are big, impressive, potentially dangerous breeds. They are harder to adopt out, many pitbulls are killed. I wonder if that number includes the dogs that are put down for good reasons by responsible owners. I remember it was either 1 or 3 millions, either way that is more than terminally ill, injured, and suffering dogs. The shelters cannot solve that they get too many animals, do not find enough people to adopt, and do not have more budgets Puppy mills would need to be outlawed. And people that want a dog (or cat) should get one from the shelter. Laws should demand that almost all dogs (and cats) should be neutered. If a person wants to breed they have to meet certain standards to be excempt from the mandate to neuter. A lot of people do not want to breed, they just do not want to spend the money for the vet. And every dog must be chipped, so people cannot abandon a dog, at least they have to bother to go to a shelter and invent a lame pretext. They have the chip mandate for dogs (and a central register) in Sweden, when a family constantly "loses" their dog(s) shelters and police will wisen up that something is off. They have hardly any stray dogs in Sweden. Stray dogs often get hurt, they breed (and add to the problem of too many dogs) or they need treatments (mange, worms, etc.), or they are traumatized, so it does not get easier to adopt them out (after the trouble to catch them).
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1