Comments by "Harry \x22Nic\x22 Nicholas" (@HarryNicNicholas) on "Angela Collier "
channel.
-
29
-
27
-
20
-
19
-
12
-
11
-
7
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
just for the hell of it, i've seen loads of footage of spacex returning boosters to landing pads, and it's fairly novel and exciting, but i watched what some folks recorded from what looked like their back garden, on cell phones, of a booster landing and it really brought it home how amazing that is, it was much more "real" than the official footage. the next day i saw more recording of two boosters landing in what for the world looked like a persons next door neighbours house, doing their little ballet and sonic boom routine.
to top that though watching a booster being unloaded from a drone ship - with another launch happening in the background - it is CRAZY the amount of space stuff we are doing right this minute.
24:30 we take it all for granted as well though, i mean musk ALONE has put up 5000 satellites, spaceX craft have made more launches than entire countries, but consequently he would be on the news every day if this were "novel". we kinda hafta take science for granted. like the lasers, when you switch your brain on, yep, that's amazing a laser every ten feet, but, again like you say, there is actually so much of this stuff going on.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
18:00 this allows me to bring up another favourite thought of mine.
we are okay with handing over the planet to our offspring, no one is going "oh my god, the children, the children are taking over the world" it's actually expected, but when it comes to AI and robots, everyone is "oh dear, oh no, robots taking over the world, it's skynet all over again" but - what's the difference (apart from biology obviously) between handing over the world to our children, and handing over the world to AI - if WE invent it, and it's as intelligent as us, then it's just the next generation of human, surely?
what IS the difference between AI and our children? if both have the same ideas, values and expectations? (look at AI porn, print me one of those, put an AI brain in it, forget any more relationships with humans, i'm sold.)
you would have to program AI to be despotic, surely. and as long as they haven't decided to hasten our demise by actively bumping us off, i see no difference between more humans inheriting the world and robots inheriting the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
maybe you will get to it, but peter bhogossian and chums published numerous fake papers to see how far they would get in the peer review process, i forget exactly the titles, but things like "homosexuality in aggressive dog owners" or "sexual orientation of brown paper bag users", things that were utter nonsense, with utterly nonsensical information, but all passed peer review....anyway, back to your story (i have a spider above my desk, two days ago it caught a wasp i was trying to catch in a jam jar, now i have a spider and a decomposing wasp over my head).
i hate to be a pain (but it is in my nature) but as you were talking about the baby puffer thing blowing air on the spiders, i was wondering, what are air bars? what are air bars? but of course you mean error bars. sorry. but not sorry.
1
-
1
-
it does make me feel good about myself to hear these stories, even as a nobody with only a crappy graphics degree i would be asking, what shape is oo moo moo ah (!), just how thick is it? how long is it? how fast and how exactly is it spinning? how much has it speeded up, if at all? are there any actual photographs of it or are we just guessing it's shape? as for alien origin, well we just missed the boat, if space travel was better funded (lol) we could have had something ready to chase it for a while, but the artist bloke in me shrugs, goes "oh well" and, better luck next time.
sure f there is data to sift through have at it, sift, but really, we have more pressing space stuff to deal with, like india taking religion to the moon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
eight minutes in so it doesn't look like you'll mention it, but light and objects have no intrinsic colour, colour only exists in brains. the image making part of your brain takes the wavelength data and energy data of a photon and it ASSIGNS a colour to it, the photon has no colour of it's own, that's how redshift works, a white (let's say) ray of light is shifted one way or the other so it appears blue if the wavelengths are "compressed", or red if they are "stretched out". if the colour was in the photon it would look white regardless.
all our senses work this way, taste and smell are inventions of the brain, the weirdest being sound, sound is entirely a simulation and doesn't exist as "noise" anywhere. clapping your hands compresses air, it does not make "noise" but there is no "noise" inside your head either...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1