Comments by "Manuell" (@manuell3505) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

  1. Some things are astonishing. How did the Mayans know about the sun's galactic orbit while their observatorium was practically a roof top?
    8
  2. It's just a child game to be "right". Like the solar system is created in week and coincidentally is in a state that makes it look like it has been formed in 4.5 billion years according to observable physical laws. This is just denial of reason for being too ignorant to get it.
    6
  3.  @treid100182  Numerology? Damn, I clicked it...
    6
  4. Same as flat earth. The dumb don't like having explained how to tie their shoelaces, so they don't believe it works. Shoelaces are a brainwashing shill.
    5
  5. If anyone is there anyway, I would like to see some pictures of the sky over the edge. There must be stars and planets never seen before. And drop a wireless radio-streaming camera, just to get a video of the fall to hell as far as it gets. ^^
    4
  6. 23 years distance. They just heard Alane by Wes...
    4
  7. A flat earth map doesn't have latitude and longitude lines and an equator. It should be a rectangular grid like a chess board. Are you really stupid enough to not see a giant problem here?
    4
  8. A new phenomenon usually gets a name. You appear already flawed...
    4
  9. True, the Dutch Southern Sea is already enclosed. That was finished in '32, but the first land reclamation isn't shown. That happened in '40.
    4
  10. Magnetic fields have 2 poles but flat earthers can't agree with that. Why explain any further? The whole idea of magnetic field lines doesn't work on a flat disc where 1 pole is also the geographic center. It would be like a magnetized coin, with 2 poles on the edge, opposing eachother.
    3
  11. Possibly, but I'm quite sure technology will make much progress on only observation. I can imagine future AI software that can zoom in to the surface of a planet at another star, by precise analysis of light.
    3
  12. It's probably not a 1000 miles radius ball with craters, flying over the earth with a unexplainable propulsion system. So, yeah, the "flat earth moon" deserves some explanation...
    3
  13. Flat earthers attempt to use religious fundamentals as authority. None of them actually are religious. It's about pretending to be relevant without any effort.
    3
  14. Do you smoke cigars, maybe?
    2
  15.  @tadferd4340  It can also be a cycle, like orbital period or a dot at the end of a sentence. But we're talking about a defined amount of ongoing time Let's stay clear...
    2
  16. They don't provide any concrete detail, which is undeniable evidence that they are all aware of they own irrelevance. A flat earther can be defined as a "uneducated lying piece of crap" without any doubt.
    2
  17. I think you overestimate their abilities. If life was about trolling, flat earthers would be nowhere to find. A child can figure this out...
    2
  18. It's an ellipse, not parabola's. And the heliocentric model can't be correctly shown on scale and still be useable. The sun is too big... And there's a few pixels difference in distance. I checked... ^^ I have a problem with the solar flames. They aren't usually that equally divided.
    2
  19.  @jiraiyavspain  Death spasms noticed...
    2
  20. RHCP, ATC...
    2
  21. It would mean that Pluto only did +/- 25 orbits around the sun since the beginning of time. It was created in a state that makes it appear like it existed there for millions of years but that's only what it looks like. Interesting detail is that all the surface artefacts on Pluto were especially created to be seen by HST and New Horizons.
    2
  22. I'm still waiting on the improbability propulsion.
    2
  23.  @jennyhall1386  Nah, you're just a anti-science loser with no chances. It's why you are here, spreading your "opinion" like spam. You lack of any substantial contribution except a link fully proves that. Would it be because you have no clue about all of this and just follow the other fakers?
    2
  24. Flat Saturn is kinda unlikely...
    2
  25. They lack the desire to understand what they see. I can't imagine this. As a nordic guy, I look at the sky from what could be called the top of the earth. This is made clearly visible by only looking at the phases of the moon and Venus over time. The problem starts when I would deny the solar system and ecliptical plane, the earth's axial tilt and Venus being the 2nd planet, while everbody sees it. This is something people should keep their kids away from...
    2
  26. The bending of spacetime or the binding of space and time.
    1
  27.  @aurouszeriah8719  At correct language, smartass. It's also "be proven", not proved. And your use of capitals is a failure too. Your Jibberish doesn't add anything...
    1
  28.  @aurouszeriah8719  Lingual, logical and grammatical. But you don't like it, huh?
    1
  29. They don't believe anything of it. They are trying to glorify stupidity because it's all there is in their bucket.
    1
  30. All sides are probably of roughly the same age...
    1
  31. Denial of what we see can't be religion.
    1
  32.  @johnthemachine  What's the difference?
    1
  33. Ad hominem? That's just discrediting someone without an actual argument. The real kids even think that not knowing details about unrelated things can make someone be wrong about the subject.
    1
  34. I think it's basically just standard, just like the boiling point of water isn't constant and depends on atmospheric pressure. Yet, 100 degrees Celsius is accepted to be the boiling point at sea level. Gravitational acceleration can slightly vary depending on latitude, and the position of the sun and moon. I have seen videos about cars rolling uphill due to gravity distortion but I don't believe that. It must require precise measurements.
    1
  35. That's due to the sun not being a point. Light comes from slightly different directions.
    1
  36. Hey, don't touch that. It's beautiful fiction.
    1
  37. This is how astrologers usually attempt to escape explanation. Just make it vague. Problem solved...
    1
  38.  @ProfessorDaveExplains  This is fake knowledge, which means you can't fight it with it's own facts as there are none and infinite at the same time. Imagine twins "identify" differently. One with the sun, the other with the moon, combined with "special" relationships with other celestial bodies. I once read that astrologers had a problem with that space mission that impacted a comet and slightly changed it's future trajectory, which of course had influence on random things. While that particular comet was way out of sight for small telescopes... No problem, factual critics against what is fully fiction can always be handled. Astrologers are always right, even if they tell different stories.
    1
  39.  @ProfessorDaveExplains  No doubt about it being completely nonsense. No predictive capabilities have ever been verified. I admit I never looked at these charts. So, it's a limited amount of information that doesn't allow minor celestial differences to be interpreted ? Something like a clock that provides constant set of parameters per time interval.
    1
  40. They could define the distance LA-NYC as a unit but that's a problem...
    1
  41.  @thepapschmearmd  The bible literally encourages observational science: Proverbs 25:2, “It is the glory of God to conceal a thing, but the honor of kings is to search out a matter.”
    1
  42. The dumbest try magnetism and forget the "flat problem", trying to explain the tides.
    1
  43.  @jakejohnson6954  How does an object know which way to fall?
    1
  44. I would like to see destruction of "fear constructs". Voodoo, wicca and such...
    1
  45.  @thomasneal9291  And your problem is? ^^ (You must curse me now for telling what I would like to see)
    1
  46. New age is a split-off of astrology but unnecessary, as astrology makes everything work as you wish already.
    1
  47.  @ivongrey9047  It's bullshit.
    1
  48. Wasn't it a fountain? It's dangerous but requires specific circumstances. Since the incident, all Dutch plumbers know to never leave a 'wet' dead end in a water pipe. Also fire hose reels are checked and sealed
    1
  49. https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/evilfinder/ef.cgi?said=gfnjfghn
    1
  50. The whole thing is boarded up against "renegade heretics". But it's actually a suppressing totalitarian system where fakers can take authority.
    1