Comments by "Manuell" (@manuell3505) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

I don't agree with that. Emphasize the dishonesty as much as possible. Every time they try to escape a question they cry inside. Still a loser. denial doesn't make it go away. I made a few delete their own comments this way...
1
@mathnerd97 The situation at any moment will never appear again. I'm usually uninterested in astrology but for what I have seen, they have no problems with tearing apart basic fundamentals until any claim fits in what is left. In this case, why not drop orbital data and the actual distances to objects, as redshift and parallax measurements provide? Then you're left with what looks like a 2d view on the universe where all the stars are static and the planets have "unpredictable" paths. Then you can make up anything out of it... At least they should redefine the zodiac. We're not Babylonians and the earth has a precession cycle. Many people technically are "bound" to multiple constellations over a period like "aquarius", even non-zodiac in cases. The greatest stupidity of astrology. Even the fundament is an error.
1
I'm from the Netherlands. Politically, we have nothing to do with Trump. But here he's a right-extremist idol for the people who can't make anything of life without inequality.
1
One funny thing is that while being a flat earther, you can't tell the departure and arrival locations plus flight distance of any single flight, including emergency flights. You also can't tell the distance between LA and Alaska. What are you talking about? (Flat earther using a globe model to prove that the globe model is incorrect...)
1
I think a helio globe is a hot air balloon. And density is vertical.
1
@jiraiyavspain Why do things fall to the ground and not sideways? And why do you call a helium balloon a helio globe? Are you on drugs? And, assuming gravity was real, and the earth attracts matter, how would you demonstrate that?
1
@jiraiyavspain So, the ground has a relation with a falling object? Advise: if you're dumb, any attempt to hide will only make it more obvious. Don't try, keep quiet.
1
@jiraiyavspain Well, you seem to be unable to answer that question. Do you truly believe nobody notices it? I think it's a problem for you: What is the relation between a falling object and the ground? Next question will be: "what name is this phenomenon given?" (To not project authority: how would you like to call it? ^^) Flerfism is denial of being a loser in public, while eveyrbody can see the truth. People should learn that. It's not smart. Better change the facts for real...
1
@jiraiyavspain Medium is ground. Objects fall to the ground. How does an object know where the ground is? Child adjustment: why doesn't a scaler work when you hold it upside-down? It shouldn't change anything, right? "there's a constant 'push' from the sky. It's caused by the forever upward accellerating but not moving plane which is the solid center of the universe"
1
@jiraiyavspain I'm not your brother, big boy. Your word choice won't help you and neither do empty counterquestions. ^^ Why doesn't a scale work upside-down? You understand the question?
1
@jiraiyavspain You mean, you do want it, but it doesn't work out...
1
@jiraiyavspain Translation: You can't hide your dumbness beyond your front door. Consider it education... It's why flat earthers don't have jobs. The world knows what they are. Think twice... Funny demonstration of this dumbness: you can't tell your own geographic location without using globe coordinates. You also can't tell where the sun is at any moment. Both 100% guaranteed.
1
@jiraiyavspain "I don't want to play kid games..." A uneducated lying POS usually is not a kid, no need to mention that. Kids still have chances and no motivation to act like that.
1
Wander? You would be surprised reading real science regarding the history of the solar system. Like asteroid collisions that have spread material all over the place. That knowledge is very solid.
1
I'm guessing erosion rules the place...
1
I thought it didn't move...
1
They might believe that, but have you ever seen a flat earther with a career?
1
@caerus90 A low IQ doesn't make anybody think that the earth is flat. Where it goes wrong is with the idea that pretending it covers intellectual inferiority.
1
I think it requires early discovery and some luck. Like, if such an object is heading to the sun for a slingshot, it might be possible to lauch a spacecraft has enoough time to accelerate and gain velocity in the same direction.
1
"There's no such thing as a particle" I now wonder what causes those bubble traces in the LHC...
1
We can't find any unexplored area where the edge eventually could be...
1
What will it see more than these light-variations? I can't wait...
1
Never heard of it. Kind of a math challenge. By measuring the precise weight of an object with a predetermined mass, it must be possible to find out your geographical height. But it gets disturbed by coriolis effect, tidal forces, water current, local gravity variations... What's the fault level if you cross the Atlantic?
1
Actually the opposite. Flat earth is denial of everything while simulation is acceptance of everything. Both without working foundation. It's wannabe-science.
1
Another conspiracy: flat earthers are experimental chip implant targets. While unaware of it, they all walk around with a software construct that can let them insist that 2+2 equals 5 and even go berserk for it, if that's what the programmer wants. 2012 might have been the prototype testing phase of the system...
1
9 years on half lightspeed is too long. There must be a trick...
1
@cormac5583 If we only found something to get a hold on space-time, like a gear...
1
Wouldn't it be that formation of a star changes to black hole when there's too much matter involved and the gravitational center reaches certain pressure and density? Like already critical mass before the formation is even finished...
1
@ProfessorDaveExplains So, a active star in final stage is always required to cause a black hole, or: gravity can't do it alone? I was imagining an amount of matter pulling to a center and get instantly too massive to become any other body.than a black hole and prevent star formation.
1
What if the "6 days of creation" represent the period from the cosmic dawn to the formation of planets and appearance of life on earth? Actually, any religious person using the "1 day must be 24 hours or 86400 seconds" is being dishonest. The bible contains many passages that are definately meant symbolic, but it somehow becomes a problem when creation is the subject. This leads to the conclusion Tour's defence can't be motivated by his own apparent faith. It's something else.
1
The side of the moon that faces the earth has technically a shorter orbit than the backside. This is tidal force causing pressure and friction inside the body. Because the moon is basically a rock and won't tear apart that easy, the most massive side of the moon slowly started to face the earth, currently almost in balance. There's still a small left/right movement.
1
@phildavenport4150 I understood this when I saw Shoemaker-Levy plunge into Jupiter's gas clouds. I'm the kind of guy that doesn't like not understanding what I see...
1