Comments by "B Nic" (@bnic9471) on "Manly Cervixes! The Left Wing Campaign to Erase Women Continues" video.

  1. Did they really say "cervixes"? Because the term is actually "cervices". The reason I know this is that I once had a large Yahoo group for women with uterine anomalies, and yeah, many of us had two cervices. Vaginas, too. My favorite story was of a college girl who finally noticed she had two. "Hello? It's Friday night and I just discovered a new orifice. Where's the gin?" There is an authentic but rare occurrence of the male uterus and cervix, though. Caused by lack of anti-Müllerian hormone in utero, so the guy has a skinny Ute and tubes parked behind his bladder. No communicating vagina, though. The testes are suspended at the end of the Fallopian tubes and often become cancerous, later on. Excellent reason to follow up on bilateral undescended testicles in childhood. Edit: frickin' autocorrect
    4
  2.  @VioletDeathRei  Recreational insulin . . . hmmm.
    2
  3. Hyperfocus on gender expression . . . I've always called it drag.
    1
  4.  @skylerwalsh9203  No, it's drag. Because I say so. Don't care about all the exquisite terminology. But you're right, I'm reacting to the obnoxious bandwagoneers, not the true dysphorics.
    1