Comments by "Arty" (@arty5876) on "1420 by Daniil Orain"
channel.
-
61
-
41
-
@Burrito69killer 6 millions people died from hunger, that was caused by destructive Civil War and Millitary Communism politics - soldiers and workers with weapons took the harvest from peasants. Enterprises were given to the worker control or nationalized. Workers lost their morivation to work, because there is no more capitalists, that could dismiss them for bad work. Also workers made their interprises irretable, because they simply made their salary bigger (Unteached workers didn't knew that total cost of money is equal to total cost of product, money don't have cost by their own, and there is no difference how many money you have, but difference is how many product). As a result less product, more money, inflation of economy, the prices are growing when there is less product with same number of money, but this cause the problems with organization of production - production of something also needs money to pay, as a result of which production become more expensive and fell, and there is cycle. That caused hunger economical decline. Most people in modern Russia blame the people, who destroyed Soviet Union, saying that in 90s there was unemlloyment ratio 25%, inflation of 300% per year and decline of everything. This people even sometimes hate the Soviet Union, but they still blame Eltsin. They don't know, that when Soviet Union was established, there was much higher and scary crisis, with same inlation in 4 years between 1922 and 1917 as a result of wonderful communist politics and Civil War. In 1922 there was the denomination of Rouble, the Rouble of 1921 was equal to 10 000 Roubles of 1918. Middle salary in 1913 was 80 Roubles, in 1921 - 300 000 Roubles. Also government controlled enterprises were unnefective due to the fact, that officials aren't motivated to lead the enterprise as capitalists, that gain profit from enterprise, and they interested in growth and profitability. 1.6 million soldiers died in Civil War from both sides, and 1.8 peasants were killed. 6 millions people immigrated from Russia, this were the scientists, ingeeners, and etc. . Russia lost a lot of territories with population. And we not talking about Brest-Litowsk peace threaty, when Germany occupied Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Baltics, and even landed in Helsinki. Thanks to the Antanta Germany lost the war, and Communists took Ukraine and Belarus. But Poland occupied some territories of Ukraine and Belarus.
40
-
10
-
9
-
@Burrito69killer The new economic policy began as a result of the revolution in St. Petersburg in 1922, which was arranged by 15 thousand soldiers and 8 thousand sailors, as well as a huge number of civilians. The revolutionaries presented Lenin with an ultimatum, which spoke of the NEP. The NEP was a forced measure that the Communists took as a compromise to avoid a revolution from the people starving as a result of their awesome politics. And to restore the economy destroyed by the communist policy with decaying capitalist methods. As a result of the NEP, the economy got back on its feet by 1928, after which the USSR will quite brutally switch to the state plan - there will be massive uprisings, in which more than 2 million people will take part. People defended their property, they did not want to lose what they had acquired. They, along with their families, will be sent to labor camps of detention, popularly called a gulag, although this is an abbreviation, or to special settlements - isolated villages on the outskirts of the world without the right to leave. In total, those subject to exile or imprisonment in camps in the period from 1928 to 1929 will be 1.8 million in the gulag, and 1.6 million in the settlements, 60 thousand people will die during transportation. the transition to the plan will be carried out by the creation of state corporations, which will have to oust them from the market through competition with private owners, establishing a monopoly. It is clear that having the resources of the entire state, direct access to the regulation of tax rates, having the entire state budget. It was not difficult to do this, taxes were increased for all private traders, as a result they went bankrupt, and the state established an almost complete monopoly, where the guys with rifles had to help.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@kathrynseaman6482 The soldiers there are already refusing to go into battle. This is said by the son of my father's friend, and in YouTube you can find the negotiations of Russian soldiers in Ukraine merged by Ukrainian intelligence. Russian soldiers refuse to go into battle, as a result, generals come to the front line, who persuade them or threaten them. That is why, by the way, Ukrainians have already killed so many of our generals. There are no conscripts in Ukraine yet, although a dozen military enlistment offices across the country have already been set on fire with Molotov cocktails. Contractors and reservists, who are offered to go to war, mostly refuse, there are very few reinforcements. There is no mobilization either. And the truth is not a war, but a special operation. There is no mobilization, the contractors calmly refuse to fight, although according to the laws of wartime they would be threatened with a tribunal for this. Conscripts do not participate. At this rate, by the end of the year there will be nothing left of our troops in Ukraine, they have no reinforcements. The Ukrainian army, on the contrary, is growing in numbers every day.
5
-
4
-
Согласно официальной статистике МВД Украины за 2013 год, в Крыму украинцы составляли 16% населения. 24% населения составляли крымские татаре, греки и другие народы. В то же самое время, в 2013 году, русские составляли 60% населения Крыма.
Иными словами, в 2013 году, ещё до аннексии, русские составляли подавляющее большинство населения Крыма. 60% населения Крыма в 2013 году составляли русские, в то время как украинцы составляли всего 16% населения Крыма.
Иными словами, Крым это с этнической точки зрения абсолютно русская территория, где ещё до аннексии подавляющее большинство населения составляли русские.
Крым собственно изначально и находился в составе Российской Советской Республики, пока в 1954 году не произошла передача Крыма Украине. В 1954 году большевистский кукурзный иуда - Никита Хрущев, передал Крым из состава Российской советской республики в состав Украинской советской республики.
В 1954 году советская власть своим недальновидным решением передала Украине российскую территорию, где подавляющее большинство населения составляли русские. В 2014 году Россия всего лишь освободила Крым, вернув российскую территорию в Родную Гавань из состава ставшей тогда враждебной Украины, после того как в Киеве произошел анти-российский незаконный госпереворот, с которым было не согласно русское население в Крыму и на Донбассе, где русские составляют 50-60% населения.
Русские люди на юго-востоке Украины в 2014 году протестовали против революции.
Россия при помощи армии защищает право этих русских людей на их самоопределение. Почему украинские протестующие на Майдане имели право на самоопределение, а русские люди на юго-востоке Украины по мнению украинцев не имеют такого права, и украинцы их называют
"незаконными сепаратистами" ? Это просто какой то космический уровень лицемерия. Киевское правительство, которое само пришло к власти в результате революции и незаконного госпереворота в 2014 году, назвало русских повстанцев на Донбассе "незаконными сепаратистами", а потом, в апреле 2014, началась "анти-террористическая операция". Русские люди, которые протестовали в 2014 году против Майдана, имеют такое же право на самоопределение, как и те люди, которые протестовали в Киеве на Майдане, и Россия обеспечит "русским сепаратистам" право на жизнь в России, отодвинув на запад российско-украинскую границу, нарисованную большевистскими иудами в 1917 и 1954 годах. Большевики дали Украине Крым, Донбасс, Измаил, освободили Львовщину в 1939. Большевистские краснопузые иудеи разбазарили российскую землю с русским населением, создав пороховые бочки в соседних с Россией странах.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
3:28 - Хорошо, если граждане России должны нести ответственность за войну и получать санкции, то почему тогда никто не ввел санкции и никто даже не осудил Америку за войну в Ираке, Ливии или Югославии? Почему когда США и Запад кого то бомбят, они делают это безнаказанно, и не получают никаких санкций. А стоит России проводить такую же политику, делать то же самое, то Россию сразу выставляют Мировым злом.
Война в Украине ничем не отличается от войны в Югославии. Косовские албанские сепаратисты подняли вооруженное восстание за свою независимость. Сербия стремилась подавить сепаратистов и восстановить свою территориальную целостность. То же самое и в Украине - русские люди на Донбассе, в 2014 году, подняли вооруженное восстание, провозгласили независимость ДНР и ЛНР. Украина стремится подавить сепаратистов. Ситуации аналогичные. Затем, в 1999 году страны НАТО признали независимость Косово, и провели военную операцию против Сербии в целях защиты права Косоварских албанцев на независимость. Абсолютно аналогично поступила и Россия - 22 февраля 2022 Россия признала независимость ДНР и ЛНР, и 24 февраля Россия начала проводить военную операцию против Украины с целью защиты права на независимость людей в ДНР и ЛНР. Если Западу можно, то почему России нельзя?
Автор этого канала - типичный предатель русской нации, либеральный куколд
2
-
@WeareChaoS Well, look, any state, and even more so a totalitarian state, justifies itself and presents itself as right. The USSR and Germany, having signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, committed a monstrous crime against humanity. However, Soviet newspapers could not write the truth to their citizens, although in the USSR the most popular newspaper was called "Pravda" ("True"). Like Orwell. So, the USSR's position on the pact is that it was supposedly necessary. That the USSR allegedly could not but sign this pact, because Germany and the USSR were enemies, and the USSR in 1939 was allegedly afraid that after the conquest of Poland, Germany would attack the USSR, so it was necessary to sign a non-aggression pact so that Germany would not attack the USSR after the seizure of Poland, well, we will divide the spheres of influence, we will move away the border is closer to Berlin. However, inconsistencies already begin here. First of all, Germany was the initiator of the negotiations. That is, Germany first of all needed a non-aggression pact with the USSR, and not the USSR itself. This contradicts Soviet history textbooks, which say that the USSR was afraid of war with Germany, and therefore was forced to sign a pact. If Germany so wanted to attack the USSR after the capture of Poland, Germany would not have initiated negotiations on the pact. The second point is that Germany would not have attacked the USSR in any way, because before the partition of Poland, Germany and the USSR did not have a common border. Before the shameful Soviet-Finnish war, the Soviet army was considered the strongest in the World. In 1939, the USSR had more tanks than the whole world combined. The USSR had 15 thousand tanks, Germany had 3 thousand, France had 4 thousand, Britain had 1.5 thousand, Japan had 1.5 thousand, the USA had about a thousand, Italy had 2 thousand. Other countries didn't really have tanks. And Germany was afraid of war with the USSR, because Germany wanted to sign a non-aggression pact with the USSR, Germany would not have attacked Poland if the Molotov-Winthrop pact had not been concluded. In fact, the USSR dissolved the hands of Germany. Hitler was afraid to repeat the First World War, when Germany was at war with half the World on several fronts, and was crushed. Hitler did not want to attack the USSR, and even if Hitler had attacked the USSR in 1939, after the seizure of Poland, Germany would have been doomed, because after the invasion of Poland, Britain and France declared war on Germany. Britain, France and the USSR would have crushed Germany by 1942. And by concluding the Molotov-Winthrop pact, Stalin provided Hitler with security from the East, and allowed the Allies to scatter, after which Hitler went to war on the USSR itself. The third point concerns the peacefulness of the USSR, which allegedly was so afraid of war with Germany that it was forced to sign a pact. Firstly, in the USSR, the state ideology was the World Revolution - the aggressive military spread of communism. During the Finnish War and the invasion of Poland, Soviet newspapers called it a campaign to liberate Finnish and Polish workers from capital. Secondly, in 1938, the USSR itself tried to start a war with Germany, tried to sign a military alliance with Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia was annexed by Germany without a fight, but the USSR really achieved the conclusion of a military pact with Czechoslovakia, and Romania even gave a corridor for 400 thousand Soviet soldiers to be sent. But, the war in 1938 did not take place, the Allies surrendered everything to Hitler without a fight.
Well, the cherry on the cake is the Moscow negotiations of the summer of 1939. August 1939 - Germany brings troops to the borders of Poland, the war between the Allies and the Reich is about to begin. However, both the Allies and the Reich were concerned about the neutrality of the USSR. The Soviet army, as I have already said, was considered the strongest in the World. The Allies and the Reich were afraid that the USSR, seeking to spread the World Revolution, would take advantage of the bloody war in Europe - in 1939, both in Berlin and in Paris, they thought that the war would be protracted and long, and that the USSR, using the war in Europe, would hit the weakened Germany, France and Britain, and seize the whole Europe. Germany was also afraid that the Allies would be able to pull the USSR over to their side, and the Allies were afraid that Germany would pull the USSR over to its side. And for the USSR, fascists and capitalists were enemies. Therefore, in 1939, the USSR negotiated simultaneously with Germany and the Allies. Negotiations with the Allies failed, and the USSR agreed with Germany. And many historians believe that the USSR just signed a pact with Germany, hoping that the Germans would shake up on the Maginot line, Europe would be exhausted by the war, and then the Soviet army would pass through the ashes. This theory was expressed by the Russian historian Viktor Suvorov back in the 90s in his book "Icebreaker - who started World War II?". In fact, Stalin used Hitler as such an icebreaker to break into Europe. And this is very similar to the situation between Russia and China now, only instead of the USSR, China, and instead of Germany, Russia. Instead of Hitler, we have Putler. Shortly before February 24, 2022, Putin and Xi met in Beijing, where Russia and China signed cooperation agreements, China publicly stated that it opposes NATO expansion. China is neutral to the Russian invasion, and while the West is distracted by Ukraine, China has already extended its military influence to the Solomon Islands, not far from Australia. When Russia, like Germany, will be divided into West and East, Moscow will build the wall, historians in Western Russia will write a book "Icebreaker. Putin."
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
thetimekillerx As for Chechnya, a significant part of Russian citizens opposed the entry of troops into Chechnya in 1994, despite the fact that terrorist and militant groups that were not controlled but loyal to the Chechen government existed on the territory of Chechnya. In 1991, Chechen terrorists, for example, took hostages on a Russian flight from Yekaterinburg to Mineralnye Vody, which landed in Turkey, where they received a ransom. Militants regularly robbed Russian trains and killed drivers. Since Chechnya was an unrecognized state, bandits from all over the former USSR gathered there. Russian russians hated the militants as a nation and carried out a frankly fascist policy - almost every day there were robberies and murders, Russians were kicked out of their apartments, which led to a massive outflow of Russians from Chechnya in 1991-1994. If in 1991 Russians in Chechnya were 52% of the population, then by 1993 - less than 30%. The deployment of troops into Chechnya was a necessary measure to stop the genocide of the Russian population and restore order and territorial integrity of Russia.
1
-
thetimekillerx Igor Strelkov (Girkin) and his squad crossed the border on April 12, 2014, and he got to Slavyansk only on April 14, 2014. Russian Russian protesters' armed uprising with the seizure of administrative buildings took place on April 6, 2014, and the declaration of independence of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics took place on April 7, 2014. 7 days before the arrival of the so-called Russian special services and Strelkov. In addition, you have no evidence that Igor Strelkov was following orders from the Kremlin. Strelkov retired from the FSB in 2013. In 2014, he was already retired, and went to Ukraine on his own, as did hundreds of Russian nationalists who then illegally came to the East of Ukraine in order to support their own.
1
-
1
-
thetimekillerx What does Kadyrov have to do with it? Already in the 90s, Chechen terrorists committed terrorist attacks on the territory of Russia, capturing and killing hostages, arranging explosions. The Chechens committed the very first terrorist attack on the territory of Russia back in 1991, long before the outbreak of the first Chechen War in December 1994. It was a hostage-taking on a flight from Yekaterinburg to Mineralnye Vody. After 1996, there were also terrorist attacks - hostage-taking at the maternity hospital in Budennovsk. The terrorists were hiding behind and killing Russian pregnant women. Russia withdrew its troops from Chechnya in 1996. And the terrorist attacks continued and only intensified. Then in 1999 Chechen militants invaded the Republic of Dagestan, crossed the Russian border. It was not Russia that started the second war. It was Chechen troops who crossed the Russian border. Also in 1999 there were explosions of houses all over Russia, although the invasion of Dagestan is already a sufficient reason to send troops into Chechnya. Russia defeated Chechnya in the 1999-2000 war, establishing full control over the Chechen territory. Chechnya is a rather wild and backward culturally Muslim country. They have a clan-clan system of power, and the Chechen people adhere to the opinion that their leader will tell them. Kadyrov and his clan turned out to be loyal to Russia. And years later, a Chechen who would not support Russia is a rarity. Most Chechens obey Kadyrov as their inviolable leader, and most Chechens support Russia and consider themselves part of Russia. And wars, both countries, both Russia and Chechnya, consider a tragedy and a mistake to which we should not return.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1