Comments by "Arty" (@arty5876) on "1420 by Daniil Orain" channel.

thetimekillerx You are spouting some nonsense. There is a FACT - in 1999 Chechen troops crossed the Russian, internationally recognized border and entered Russian territory. Chechen fighters entered the territory of Russia. Putin didn't need to blow up any houses to justify an invasion. Within a month of hostilities, the Russian army drove the Chechens out of Dagestan, and then the Russian military crossed over to Chechen territory. As for Chechnya, Chechnya was not independent in 1999. It was an entity unrecognized by anyone in the world, which was difficult to call a state. On the territory of Chechnya there were detachments of Islamists not controlled by the Chechen state, which attacked Russia in 1999
1
thetimekillerx Okay, they crossed the demarcation line between legal Russian territory controlled by Russia and legal Russian territory controlled by Chechnya. This is how it would be better to say. The invasion was necessary because the Chechen government was incompetent and did not control the situation in their country, so that there were armed Islamist militants on the territory of Chechnya who attacked Russia
1
thetimekillerx With regards to Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the DPR and the LPR, yes, Chechnya was also an unrecognized state, like them. Russia did not recognize the independence of the DPR and LPR until 2022 and did not recognize the independence of Abkhazia and Ossetia from 1992 to 2008. I will even say more - when in 1992 there was a war between Georgia and Abkhazia, Russia intervened in the conflict on the side of Georgia. And another little-known fact - the Chechens wanted to create a single Caucasian state, and Chechen fighters fought on the side of Abkhazia against Georgia and Russia
1
thetimekillerx Unlike the Chechens, the Ossetians did not enter Georgian territory. The rebels from the DPR and LPR also did not enter the territory of Ukraine. Do you hear the difference? Russia in 1996 withdrew its troops from Chechnya and signed a peace treaty. After that, in 1999, Chechen fighters crossed the Russian border. Rebels from Ossetia, Abkhazia and East Ukraine did not cross the border or attack Ukraine or Georgia.
1
@aikhomolius4112 Finland still didn't joined NATO, and process of joining could be rejected by Turkey
1
@котик-ц8х "мы живем под мирным небом" - ага, а на Украине что происходит? "Путин не дает россиян в обиду иностранцам" - ага, китайцы там Сибирь вырубают, весь Мир против России вводит санкции, Россия сейчас окажется в изоляции... Интересно, а кто вообще давал россиян кому то в обиду?
1
@rongike If you're so smart, maybe you'll go to jail yourself? The initiative is punishable by its execution by those who put it forward. As for the protests, I don't see any point in protesting, because those people like me who don't support Putin are a minority. There is no point in protesting
1
Russia should not comply with the referendum in Kaliningrad because there is no German population there. We annexed Crimea to Russia, because in 2014 60% of the population there were Russians, and only 16% were Ukrainians. In 2014, Ukrainians were a pitiful minority of the population of Crimea, only 16%, while Russians in Crimea were 60%. We annexed Crimea because there was a coup d'état in Ukraine and pro-Western political forces overthrew the pro-Russian government. We did not want to, but we were forced to annex Crimea under such conditions.
1
Karelia has always been part of Russia. You can open a map from the 14th century, 15th century, 17th century, 19th century or 20th century. As for the Kuriles and Sakhalin, these territories were divided between Russia and Japan in the course of numerous agreements in the 19th century, at the beginning of the 20th century Japan seized these lands for itself, and in 1945 the USSR, at the request of the United States, entered the war against Japan in order to help defeat her
1
The regions of the south-east of Ukraine are inhabited by Russian people. In Crimea in 2014, 60% of the population was Russian. When our army began to seize the Crimea, the local people rejoiced and greeted our soldiers as liberators. People in Crimea have been waiting for 23 years for the moment when they will return home to Russia. In eastern Ukraine, 50% of the population is Russian and 50% Ukrainian. In the south of Ukraine, 30-40% of the population are Russians. Why did this war even start and why did we decide in 2014 to regain Crimea? You see, there was a coup d'état in Ukraine and the pro-Russian government was overthrown by pro-Western and anti-Russian politicians. Therefore, we were forced, we simply had no choice but to protect the Russian people in Crimea from the anti-Russian revolutionaries who had seized power in Kyiv. Russian people, citizens of Ukraine, went out in 2014 to protest against that coup d'etat and the overthrow of the pro-Russian president. By taking Crimea, we defended their right to self-determination. And the Ukrainian army agreed to voluntarily leave the Crimea. Ukrainian officers shook hands with our officers, 20 thousand Ukrainian soldiers left the Crimea without a fight. Because they knew that Crimea is Russian territory.
1
@vaataja In Crimea in 2014 and until 2014, 60% of the population were Russians, 24% Tatars and 16% Ukrainians. Russians in Crimea until 2014 were 60% of the population, and only 16% of Ukrainians. Crimea is an absolutely Russian territory, where the majority of the population is Russian, and Ukrainians are a minority of the population. It's just that Crimea, by mistake of the Soviet government, became part of Ukraine in 1954. But this is Russian territory. And in 2014, this Russian territory returned to its native harbor with the full support of the local population. And the Ukrainian army left the Crimea without a fight, giving it to our troops, which again proves that this is Russian territory. Because if it was Ukrainian land, the Ukrainians would not have given it away without firing a shot.
1
@Nilme_Achanduine What other prison? In Russia, practically no one is persecuted under articles that restrict freedom of speech. We do not have mass repressions. They can only detain some popular person, and then they give them time to leave the country and make hints. For example, Ilya Yashin, a liberal pro-Western politician, he has one and a half million subscribers on youtube. He was arrested by the police in June of this year. For more than three months since February 24, he calmly spread Western propaganda to the millions of people, and our police wanted him to simply leave Russia. But he did not want to leave Russia like all the other liberal traitors, he, like Navalny, proved that he was a patriot who did not leave the country, but went to prison.
1
@Nilme_Achanduine And yes, do not forget that during the war, freedom of speech is unacceptable. Otherwise, enemy propaganda will fool people's brains. In any country, in any society, even the most democratic, freedom of speech is limited during the war. It is the same in Ukraine now - in Ukraine it is now impossible to express a pro-Russian position, and in Ukraine there are also criminal and administrative articles for such rhetoric. So your claim is completely incomprehensible to me. Putin is doing everything right, the enemies of society should not have freedom of speech.
1
So, according to the Lithuanian logic USA are also terrorist state
1
And what does modern Russia have to do with the USSR? Russia and Boris Yeltsin played a key role in the collapse of the USSR. It was Boris Yeltsin who achieved the autonomy of the Russian Soviet Republic from the USSR in 1990, and it was Yeltsin who suppressed the communist coup in 1991, after which the Belovezhskaya Accords were signed. Russia voluntarily gave the countries of Eastern Europe freedom from the USSR. And how are we paid for it? - The expansion of NATO to the East and the creation of a threat to Russia. Aggressive anti-Russian rhetoric. In the Baltic countries, monuments to Soviet liberators are being demolished, but every year on March 16, a march in memory of the Latvian SS is held in Riga
1
@patrickb1811 Since when is Christian white Russia with a republican system of government culturally more Asia than Europe?
1
@orkako How has Russia insulted the peoples of the Baltics and Eastern Europe since 2000? When did Russia threaten someone with conquest or a nuclear strike? Stop talking nonsense, you sick Nazi. Until recently, Russia did not threaten anyone, and NATO expanded to the East. As for the wars with Russia's neighbors, Georgia itself is to blame for being attacked - Georgia shelled Abkhazia and Ossetia, and Russia conducted a peacekeeping operation. The same with Ukraine - Ukraine shelled Donbass for 8 years. The war in the East of Ukraine has been going on for 8 years. Now Russia is forcing Ukraine to peace
1
@Solo-vh9fm yes, I agree. But Crimea was a territory of Russian Soviet Republic. There is difference between National Republics and Central power in Kremlin
1
@3nutria Russia was captured by the Soviet invaders in the same way as the Baltic countries. How can you not understand this. There was a civil war in Russia, as a result of which the communists won. The Soviet communists denied the existence of nations and wanted to arrange a world revolution. Why do you equate Russia and the USSR? Russia was occupied by the communists in the same way as Ukraine, the Baltics and the countries of Eastern Europe. And your biased attitude towards Russia and the expansion of NATO to the East led to war
1
@3nutria If you think that Russia should not react in any way to NATO expansion and threats to its security, then try saying that to John Kennedy. When the USSR deployed nuclear missiles in Cuba, America howled to the whole world. The United States was gathering troops to Cuba, and American officials from the Foreign Ministry were hysterical and threatened Cuba with war. Since then, Cuba has been under absolutely unjustified sanctions. If the American leadership considered Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba a threat and was ready to respond militarily, then why is Russia also not entitled to respond militarily when 18 years of negotiations with NATO ended in failure?
1
@3nutria What's the difference how Russian citizens relate to the USSR? There are elections in Russia, there is a parliament in which there is a communist party. The communist views of citizens only affect the results of elections. What about the USSR and Stalin? In addition, the Communist Party is not ruling and in fact has never been one - even in the 90s, a coalition of a scattering of small Democratic parties held the majority in parliament. Under Putin, elections have ceased to be fair at all, and the country is ruled by a coalition of former democratic parties - United Russia. This is essentially a fascist party, even by the name you can see. Fashio in Italian means unity, bundle. With regards to continuity, continuity and equality are two different things.
1
@3nutria if Russian authorities are "not happy, that they aren't controlling Eastern Europe", so - why Russian authorities played the main role in the collapse of USSR in 1991?
1
@3nutria you are talking nonesence. Russian authorities and Putin never threatened the independence of Baltic states.
1
@3nutria I agree with that they have right to self-defense. Also, the Baltics in the NATO aren't causing a threat to Russian security. About the USSR : the communist ideology isn't the governmental and isn't main in Russia. Putin and his party have no ideology. Putin was talking many things about USSR, some of them bad, and some good. For example Putin once said, that Soviet economy was trash. Putin said that the collapse of USSR is a tradegy because at now we have war and crisis in post-Soviet space. Armenia and Azerbaidjan, Georgia had the bloody military conflict with ethnic minorities, Russia and Ukraine, NATO expansion. Many countries of post-Soviet Asia are living worser than in Soviet times.
1
@copy2886 Zhirinovsky was a court jester, a clown who spoke all sorts of nonsense. And no one wants and is not going to "capture all the countries of the former USSR." Russia is fighting against Ukraine because Ukraine was at war with Russian separatists in the southeast for 8 years from 2014 to 2022. Russia defends the right of the Russian people to self-determination. In fact, Russia is conducting a peacekeeping operation, the same one that NATO conducted in Kosovo in 1999. With regards to technology, products and trade, first of all, there is no merit of the West in this, because we earned money with our own labor in order to buy it all in the conditions of a global economy and a global distribution of labor. With regards to products, I can say that modern imported food products are chemicals that poison people, and in the USSR there were natural and tasty food products without chemical additives. With regards to technology, Russia is one of three countries in the world with its own space program, Russia provides itself with communications and telecommunications, and Russian services in space are in great demand in the world. On the ISS, half of the modules are Russian, and Russia is busy pushing this station so that it does not fall to the ground. Google was founded by Russian - Sergey Brin, and Apple in 1989 bought handwriting recognition technology from Soviet scientists. Russia is a leader in peaceful nuclear technologies.
1
Люди в Западной Европе живут дольше, потому что у нас относительно рано умирают старики, которые пережили тяжелые времена в 1980-е и 1990-е. Эти трудные годы сократили их продолжительность жизни. В целом продолжительность жизни в России постепенно растет.
1