Comments by "S3N7RY" (@S3NTRY) on "Lex Clips" channel.

  1. "Sam Harris: voice of reason" - Lex Fridman: underrated comedian
    119
  2. Is Destiny's face falling apart?
    36
  3. Waiting in line at 4 in the morning. Truly the mark of rationality, right there.
    18
  4. Sam's ability to read Trump's mind is what is most impressive.
    15
  5. @shawnbrink7998 proof of what? Crack smoking? Backroom deals? Yeah, it had those.
    9
  6.  @wilsonsanabia4259  yeah, he just doubles down. Like he did in this clip.
    8
  7.  @noorkidwai  he did that. He denied children weren't affected by covid in the same way as adults in this very clip. Use your delusion, buddy.
    7
  8.  @terminator2348  it was literally experimental. They needed to declare emergency use. Research into a technology is not implementation of said technology. That's just sophistry.
    7
  9.  @Shiggystardust  what was wrong with Kavanaugh?
    7
  10. "we try" not very hard, it seems, if DAN is anything to go by.
    7
  11.  @robertblackwell8611  won't stop him from dragging Brett though
    6
  12. ​ @BenefitOfTheDoubtInquiry what a bunch of bs
    6
  13. And a lot of the data was just outright ignored.
    6
  14. "Jesse, what the hell are you talking about"
    5
  15. "Music to my ears" is a non-answer? The real question behind the question is "can you recognise when your side goes too far?" RFK: "If I close my eyes, and shut my ears, we can all sing kumbaya"
    5
  16. ​ @joela.4058 bs he thinks that speaking in a calm monotone makes you sound ungodly rational... <cut to his Triggernometry interview>
    5
  17.  @Rikarth  he said children were at risk in this video. There was evidence from the start that that simply has never been true. Scientifically. Where did he get that great nugget, while he was trying to tell everyone to ignore people saying that very thing?
    5
  18. ​ @orange-418lol Ooof SH denies science to this day, and treats opinion as fact. Talking out both sides of his face. What are you on about.
    5
  19.  @stephensehrbrock5613  he was wrong about the impact of the "virus of unknown origin" on children. In this very clip. After we've had the science on it for 3 years.
    5
  20.  @tricky2014  he was wrong about a very key piece of information that was available 3 years ago. In this video he says we didn't know how it would impact children. Wrong. We knew from the start, it's just another case of "if it's not presented in the news media, the data doesn't exist". The irony is that Sam just ignored the data that was always there. On government websites. The entire time.
    5
  21.  @squirlmy  very nice. Now let's see that broken down by age demographics, health demographics, and "with" not "from". Let me know if you can see the absurdly obvious. And if body-count is your single metric, you must be all over the rash of excess deaths affecting the majority of nations that took a certain mandatory path. You must be enraged at the deafening silence on those figures.
    4
  22. ​ @casualviewing1096 It's funny that you go for appeal to authority on characters that all defer to other professionals in their respective field for their information, and source said information (JRE not withstanding). And you're right, Campbell has been wrong on a number of things: the science behind masks, and the efficacy of v*cines, both of which he has come to realise were undermined entirely by the evidence, since. Good luck with your smear-job.
    4
  23.  @haonyoass9556  he said we didn't know how it impacted children. It was known from the very beginning. Spoiler: they brushed it off like it was nothing... The entire 3 years and counting
    4
  24.  @STVNDMC  I don't think you can claim clinical equality, but you'd have to be distrustfully obtuse to make a strawman of it, wouldn't you.... Explain my cultishness, I'm all ears.
    4
  25. Sam Harris has such a low opinion of anyone that isn't Sam Harris.
    3
  26.  @jackeagleeye3453  what was he wrong on?
    3
  27. ​ @danielbanks332 He said we didn't know the impact on children. This was known in basic statistics (that nobody brought up) from the very beginning. And he still acts like it was an unknown. With 3 years of data. Ignorant or foolish. Take your pick.
    3
  28. @@swallowingtherabbitwhole9552 you're pretending that the only way out is "through the fire". Your premise is flawed.
    3
  29. "I know everything I need to know about t-dawg, and my cognitive dissonance couldn't handle my preconceived notions being destroyed"
    3
  30.  @taeeererer  already have. Like 5 times. He said we didn't know what risk there was to children. In this very video. Completely wrong. We've had that data from the outset. Now, what was I wrong about, crayon muncher?
    3
  31.  @DinosaurSuccess  examples of his corruption? Or are you like Sam, where you think just saying that is all the evidence you need?
    3
  32. This is a treasure-trove of contradictions. It is truly amazing.
    3
  33.  @blue24563  he was dancing around it the entire time. Don't be a sophist.
    3
  34. ​ @richardfraser7024 From the point of what? The lab? Because you can't be talking like the deaths were in every way avoidable.
    2
  35. ​ @jhonklan3794 Um, he did say that, just not in this interview. Look up his interview with triggernometry. That quote is close to verbatim.
    2
  36.  @MrVagif1  no, it means your thought process was sound, because you were right - you just think the only path to the correct outcome is guessing when it doesn't align with your outcome. No doubt whatsoever you throw the term "conspiracy theorist" around like candy.
    2
  37. "The issue wasn't his policies, it was him as a person" Referring to a president. The voice of reason, everyone. It just goes on and on... It's super entertaining 😂
    2
  38.  @duewest9801  yeah, and you can deflect to protect your beloved.
    2
  39.  @trancient  he was wrong on the assertions around children. Known since day 1, claims we didn't know, 3 years later.
    2
  40. ​ @amazin7006 Your posts are amazing. So confident that nobody can point out where SH is wrong, and then you go super quiet, when they give you a timestamp, say 10:45. You might want to get yourself checked, just sayin'
    2
  41.  @seanlennon5986  or you're just ignoring where people are citing the video directly. Example: my post directly before yours. Unless of course, it's shadow-banned, but that would just be conspiracy theory.
    2
  42.  @taeeererer  Just look at the CFR data from the beginning of the pandemic, until now. It's all there, ad hom boy
    2
  43. "There are limitless indicators of t-dawgs corruption." Not one citation, or example given.
    2
  44.  @vsTylervs  research shows that it would have had a tangible impact on the election.
    2
  45.  @thetaytheist  what linguistic f'ery are you up to. He was wrong, and still is wrong. You wanted an example I gave you one. Now you're being a weasel about it.
    2
  46.  @STVNDMC  it's a qualitative comparison, not a quantitative one. Time to go back to Harris-U.
    2
  47.  @taeeererer  Sam Harris appears to have learnt more from the last few years than you have. I'm not sure what medal that earns you, but I'm certain Galileo would be the first to hand it to you.
    2
  48.  @Shiggystardust  so, your primary occupation to pass a sniff test is whether someone is capitalist? lol
    2
  49.  @Shiggystardust  I mean, sure you can have it. Not my fault your argument was in no way cogent.
    2
  50.  @Shiggystardust  way to double-down on nothing.
    2