Comments by "Mike Corleone" (@ogslowdragon) on "Vox" channel.

  1. Send recovering patients to nursing homes like Cuomo. That's how you stop it.
    5
  2. "Wars actually declining". Your out of touch with reality. The 20th century had been the bloodiest in all of history. Over 170,000,000 million people slain by Stalin, pol pot, and Mau Zedong in the spread of communism and in the Nazi regime's attempt to socialize the world. Do civil wars not count in your stats.
    2
  3. Nobody cares
    2
  4. 3 inches a year. Not three centimeters. That's right.
    1
  5. This entire video trying to make a victim out of someone who would never stoop to such an sjw position. Luckily, her genius level IQ would never let her make that tragic mistake.
    1
  6. Avicus Noob 170 trillion? That's more people than ever existed. I think we topped out at 20,000,000,000 (that's billion) total. We're only 14 years into the 21st century so it's to early to tell, but the trend seems to be pro-war. Obama has gotten us into 7 different wars in the first 4 years as president, and now it's Afghanistan, Syria, and soon Iraq again if we keep letting ISIS (AL-QAEDA) do their tHing. (I think we're finding them still..idk) Ukraine's got there own thing going on with Russia. China's about to finish off Japan after they almost destroyed themselves with fukashima. Africa's imploding. Cambodians are getting restless. Idk... why people think things are getting better. We might not be calling it war now (blocking insurgents, reforming counties into democracies) but even if you polish a turd, it's still a turd.
    1
  7. Avicus Noob Nazis 13/16 million. Stalin 70 million. Pol pot 1/3 of his entire counties population. Mau Zedong- no accurate numbers but it's hug bigger than Stalin I think, and that's still going on. 
    1
  8. ***** What planet do you live on. Count the deaths in the last 2 world wars, communist/atheistic regimes, and infanticide (abortion (pre and post birth), and civil wars. There were almost as many people alive as ever died, but that number is going down again. It has *literally*been the bloodiest century in the history of the world. And it all stemmed from a belief that there is no God and we have to decide what's right for ourselves. So relative morals took the place of absolutes; and if everything's relative and there's no God to derive morals or worth from, anything is permissible. Including killing the weak and useless masses to benefit the strong and preserve what little resources we have. It's pretty sad, but it's sadder to think you believe we are living in the most peaceful times. 
    1
  9. ***** you are clearly delusional. Let's take Pol Pot, a Cambodian revolutionary who led the Khmer Rouge, presided over a totalitarian dictatorship that imposed a radical form of agrarian socialism on the country. His government forced urban dwellers to relocate to the countryside to work in collective farms and forced labor projects. The combined effects of executions, forced labor, malnutrition, and poor medical care caused the deaths of approximately 25 - 33 percent of the Cambodian population. In all, an estimated 1 to 3 million people (out of a population of slightly over 8 million) died due to the policies of his four-year premiership. That's just one of the atheistic/communistic tyrants of the 20th century. Check your sources, I think they're fluffing you. p.s. "peer reviewed" these days just means agreed upon by like minded individuals. It's no longer a "checks and balances" of the stringent scientific process. Take evolution for instance. The same scientists that insist that it took place also reveal that the only reason they promote the idea is because they refuse to believe in or hate God; Not because of evidence or any real tangle observations. 
    1
  10. Avicus Noob don't split hairs. We're only 14 years into this century. And the outcome looks bleak. Yes I meant 170 million. And yes you're right. They were and those 2 weren't the only wars. Civil battles wage on even till today. Look at Iraq and Syria. Hope I didn't go to fast for us.
    1
  11. ***** exactly how many wars are we involved in right now? How many countries are in violent turmoil? You think we've risen above our petty indifference? Do you really believe that its a positive trend that we are seeing play out around the world. FYI, the real danger is the globalization of government. How many people do you think are going to be silenced to squash the opposition to losing our sovereignty in the U.S.? How many do you think will survive when we are asked( not so politely) to join the global community in subservience to powers outside of the American people's hands? Obama has made it clear he wants to bring about the new world order just like Bush junior and senior. Remember project freedom where we put into action the "shock and awe" method of warfare? I don't have to rifle through the internet for evidence, I just have to turn on the tv. And I know not everything you see on tv is true, but pictures say a thousand words and video runs at 28 frames per second. I don't trust the guys doing biased studies. Everyone has an agenda. I trust the people that have nothing to gain by lying because they know a pound of truth is better than a ton of lies. Like Hitler said if you say a lie long enough, and loud enough, the people will believe it. Want the truth. Do a little research yourself on the number of Christians being persecuted and now crucified in the middle east and around the world. It's a direct result of factions overpowering their neighboring countries. It's only a matter of time before we see it on our own streets.
    1
  12. Allen Luo if you think the government's of the world are run within themselves you are sorely mistaken. There is a group of people that manipulate all the governments. Most of them work for the federal reserve. They make war to profit from it and are slowly trying to bring the world under their control. And it may be true that many other religions are being messed with but none more than Christianity. Name another that's being persecuted to the extent that Christianity is. Crucifixion and beheadings still going on today. why? Because only in Christianity is it possible to know freedom as the founders of the U.S. sought after. Just like the declaration of independence's well chosen words"we hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are CREATED equally". And have "inalienable rights endowed by our CREATOR". Name another religion that recognizes the value of each and every single individual as significant that a government could use as a foundation for civil rights and liberties. I think you'd be hard pressed and the NWO knows that. That's why Christians are the only religion you see openly mocked on the streets while all the others enjoy political correctness and bias to not be mocked publicly. Fortunately the truth doesn't need protection. It's self evident and above the pettiness of the elite. Try as they might to twist, misuse, corrupt and vilify the word, it still rises above the foolish and the evil of the world. And although Christianity may have been infiltrated by people out to try and make it look bad, Christ has been kicking butt for the last 2000 years and as the good book says"will have them in derision"."though this world shall pass away, my word shall last forever".
    1
  13. Allen Luo it's the blind leading the blind with you man. You pretend to understand that which you do not know. Read up then act like you know.
    1
  14. Allen Luo that small sect was the majority of Christians that left Europe and came here to get away from what they believed to be a miss interpretation of the word(Catholicism). "More rights and freedoms than modern day America" ...they learned to read cause they were locked away in their homes and had Nothing else to do. The only reason they may have had more literal knowledge than men was because men were to busy doing everything else like trading and farming to bother with learning how to read. Their main focus was being able to count whatever money or trade they were dealing with. The Mongols worshipped idols and were the most blood thirsty in the region. They almost conquered as much land as Rome in their world domination days. You think the holocaust was a demonstration? Of what? Name one group other than those bat crap crazy Westboro Baptist freaks that openly attack other religions. See it's fortunate for them that Christianity not only allows people to choose for themselves what they want to believe but also was the foundation for the rights of freedom that we enjoy in the U.S., unlike Islam or atheism which vilifies and persecutes Christians on the daily for their beliefs. "Very little evidence" of the new world order? That's what they want you believe; just like the devil to trick you into thinking it isn't real. Bush Jr. And Sr. Mentioned bringing America into a new world order, Clinton mentioned it, o-bama mentioned it. Just check out their state of address speeches. Or when they addressed congress right before attacking someone. That's why they teach evolution in schools. A state run religion of its own. Explaining the unobservable origins of life without explaining it. Just listen to Dawkins, Hitchens, Krause... They all say the same thing; they'll accept any hypothesis as long ad it isn't God. .. no no no, can't allow that. But remember all processes need an agent to kick it off. They do not start on their own. 
    1
  15. Allen Luo check this out http://www.infowars.com/hillary-clinton-praises-kissingers-upcoming-book-world-order/
    1
  16. Azu (money) for what?
    1
  17. Azu compared to self inflicted diseases like lung cancer, sorosis of the liver, or abortion. Yeah your right. I think planned parenthood just hit their international 5 billion mark a few years ago.
    1
  18. Azu true, but most are from smoking or inhaling stuff (asbestos, chemical fumes). Really, it's funny everyone who's for abortion has already been born. I bet if you were still in your mother's womb and we made some technology so we could hear your thoughts, you'd probably disagree. If that's true, why stop at birth. Why not give the mother a few years to reconsider keeping the child. Exactly when does it stop being a fetus and become a person. I would argue conception. Everything's there. People argue"they can't fend for themselves" ;neither can you naked on the arctic. Does that mean you don't have the right to live? People need to realize stopping something from living is killing, and if that something is another human being, it's murder. Plain and simple. 
    1
  19. Azu so what's the difference? It's not alive in her belly? And a fetus has brain function at 5 weeks. So if that baby is a girl, do you support her right to live? Everything "matter wise"is there but you don't call a frog in a blender alive. Only when it's arranged into a living being is it alive. How is it against her will? Did she not engage in the act willingly that may produce a child? It's not forcing them to be pregnant. It's forcing them to take responsibility for their actions maybe. But even so, what about the child? Do they not have the right to live a full life.
    1
  20. Azu that's a whole different matter. And why don't they just execute the rapist and adopt out the child. Doesn't that solve the problem. Yeah, it's called not having sex. 
    1
  21. Azu wow, so you would rather protect the violator than the innocent. Have you ever watched a baby get dismembered while still in the womb. If it's lungs weren't filled with embryonic fluid I'm sure the anguish that the infant would be expressing would curdle Your blood. And sex is for married people, not just to procreate. It sounds a little crude but who wants to by the cow when you get the milk for free. Not to mention what happens when the drinker get sour milk? Do you really want to share it with someone else after that. Sex in a marriage setting is the safest, honorable, and reassuring that your not being used; as I'm sure you've noticed our culture turning into one of disposable relationships.
    1
  22. Azu stop playing like your dense. "It's a fetus not a baby"...who's living in the dark ages? "Less important than the bodily anatomy of the woman"? We can argue that but that's not what you said. You said kill the baby and jail the rapist instead of kill the rapist and adopt out the baby. I'm sure you've met women with baggage from previous relationships, because they entrusted their virtue to someone who never intended to appreciate it in the first place. I guess that's the angle your coming from; Keep em' giving it away instead of making men earn it. 
    1
  23. Azu a woman is not a shoe or a glove and shouldn't be treated like one. What else if not eye witness testimony do you base anything on? There goes all of history and science, anything else you want to deny? Sorry my phone is dumber than I am. I'll try to give a S#!T and check my spelling. What about the babies life. Hell, let's make it fair, get a cup and put a marble in it for the baby, then one for the mother, one for the father, and one for the doctor. Shake it up and whichever one gets picked losses their life. That's fair isn't it. None gets to choose. Fate decides who lives and who dies. Already it won't be murder. You need to take your biology class again or they just left what conception means out of your curriculum. I'll use little words so you can understand. When a mommy's egg and a daddy's little swimmer come together, they create a new person. That person is half from mommy and half from daddy. A whole person; different from mommy and daddy and that person should be treated as such, not treated like a hang nail. 
    1
  24. Azu you were almost human except you deny that that single cell has all the information it takes to make a human. It's not pond scum that evolves into a human. It's a human. Plain and simple. Just an immature one. It won't potentially become a human. It has no option but to be what it is; a human. As unreliable as eye witness testimony is, it's the most reliable way to know something. Funny how you don't point out what you disagree with, only that you disagree. Opinions are like other parts of a human. I won't go there but you know what in saying. And no, I don't know that. You make it plain and simple. Women are disposable almost as disposable as the live in their bellies. If you don't like one, you just get another. It's kinda hard to misinterpret that. "If that is what your into"; obviously, your not. But that's why you get to know the person before you make a commitment or perform acts that will tie you to them forever if things don't go as wham bam thank you ma'am, that you plan. 
    1
  25. Azu cool with me. Your godless perspective on the value of human life between one second old and 9 months is sad anyways. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make em' drink.
    1
  26. So,the wage gap is a fabrication. If women worked as hard as men they'd make the same amount, but the issue is your definition. It's not a wage gap, it's an earnings gap. The wages are almost identical for the same job, no matter if you are male or female. But the amount of hours worked are different because of women's preference. No one is forcing them to choose to take time off for children or what not. But now it seems men are blamed for these choices. Maybe we should stick to actual facts instead of inflated issues. A lie is a lie, no matter how you sugar coat it.
    1
  27. That or their getting in touch with the truth. That we are all children of God and should love one another as brothers. That's what's going on in China and other countries that haven't forgotten or have come to the realization of where they came from.
    1
  28. ***** what other life forms? Do you knOw something the rest of the world doesn't? Or is that imagination your using? And what planets? you see a wobble in a dot of light and think that's enough evidence to say that a planet is inhabitable? The amount of assumptions you have to make to come up with that conclusion boarders on delusion. Not trying to insult you though. I'm open to the idea but I haven't seen anything concrete that would make me think life was possible outside of earth. We live in the" Goldilocks region "of our solar system. Scientists think they can tell that a planet is present, and at that distance, by the wobble of star light. That's a stretch by any standard. I think they're just worried about keeping their jobs instead of honesty. 
    1
  29. AndRiseUp that's a little like the pot calling the kettle black. And although Jefferson went the Westcott and Hort route (NIV)that doesn't change that fact that he believed Jesus was God. You can make up all you want about people that aren't around any more cause that can't set you straight, but read what they had to say shout the subject before jumping on the hearsay bandwagon.
    1
  30. chris warf they just had an incident in Florida where a man beat a teen ferociously for molesting his 11 year old son.
    1
  31. legna20v yeah. But Gays don't mind their own business or they wouldn't try to redefine things like marriage and civil rights. I guess they trick themselves into thinking it's not a choice. Like they're just born with a set of obligations that they can't change. Do you think men in general are born with a desire to be with just one woman? Of course not. It's a choice to deny yourself relations with as many beautiful women as you can get. Just like it's a choice to lay with someone of the same sex. We are all born with desires,some not very good for us; but we all know too well that if we live by them we will drown in them. It's no different for homosexuals. It's a choice. That's all. But then they expect people that recognize the purpose of sexuality to accept anything. Soon those beastly bestiality people are gonna want the same rights homosexuals ask for. And that will be there precedent to legally get it done. If anyone can redefine things as they see fit; where does it stop. They have civil unions but that wasn't good enough. They want to take something created by God(marriage - the coming together of one man and one woman in a life long commitment, and the two become one) and twist it to what they want and throw God out of it all together. 
    1
  32. legna20v 1-no, plenty of hypocrites claim to be Christian. How can you say you put your faith in Christ and then turn around and flaunt sin in his face. Not saying any Christian is perfect but a big part of Christianity is turning away from sin, not living in sin and acting like it's all good. 2- So God's just supposed to go around haunting us, acting like an armchair quarterback. Every time were about to do something wrong he just pops up like that old black man that knows every sentence for every crime" Don't do that, you'll get 5 to 10 for that!", SMH. God respects our free will. He created us in his image and gave us a rational mind and a conscience. When someone says they were born that way, they just mean they were confused and no-one was there to show them the right way so they ran with it. But God gave us what we call special revelation and the natural law. He told us through special revelation (the bible) ,he revealed the purpose for sexuality was for one man and one woman to join together for life and enjoy sex in a life long commitment. But also"naturalisticly speaking, tab A goes into slot B; it's like we were made with built in instructions. Because people have perverted that and tried to twist the purpose of sexuality doesn't mean it's a free for all on the purpose of sex. Even from a materialistic, atheistic, agnostic, or non-theist perspective, how is that helping keep our species going? If homosexuals were stuck somewhere by themselves, unless they choose to have sex with the opposite sex, they would die out in one generation. That's just common sense. 3- And those men are called polygamists. Not a good thing. Obviously selfish, narcissistic individuals have always existed. Even king Solomon had 600 wives and 300 concubines but that doesn't make it right. Hitler led millions to kill millions, that doesn't make it right just cause some people, or a group, or a culture thought it was. 4- who said anything about persecuting, just cause we don't celebrate homosexuality doesn't mean we (Christians) hate them. See that's a common misconception. Just because we disagree with the sin of people doesn't mean we don't love them. We all sin. But we help guide them out of that sin. And like Jesus says"before you try to get that splinter out of your brothers eye, get that plank out of your own eye, that way you will be able to see clearly enough to help your brother with the splinter in his eye"meaning; make sure you get the sin out of your life before you try to help anyone else with their sin. It's not like we are just preaching without practicing. But hate never comes onto the picture. We don't want to hurt anyone, we want to save them from themselves. Our inherent sinful nature. Ex. NoOne had to teach you to lie. It came naturally. No-one ever sat you down and explained the merits of lying, but someone did tell you that you shouldn't do it, and your conscience tied you into that truth. They didn't do it cause they hated you, they did it because they knew you would have a happier, more fulfilling life if you didn't lie. That's the only reason we tell people of their sins. Not to persecute them but to lead them to a more fulfilling life. Where they can find true joy in a relationship. And I know there are people that are in bad heterosexual marriages. But that usually arises because they didn't start that relationship the right way and ended up in something they shouldn't have been in in the first place. 6- marriage is in other religions because they remembered it from before the tower of Babel. When the nation's split up And went their own separate ways. And no, it's God that said that marriage was between a man and a woman. Matthew 9: 3The Pharisees also came unto him(Jesus), tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife for every cause? 4 And he(Jesus) answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning made them male and female, 5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? 6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. 7-And yes I know openly gay friends, and yes I talk about it with them, but no I don't just bombard them with the facts every time I see them. Life gives me plenty of opportunities to show them the errors of their thinking when calamity finds them. Homosexuality is not a successful lifestyle. They put on a good front but sooner or later reality hits and then I have a chance to explain to them why. 8- they have just as many rights as everyone else, but no, they want special treatment. They want things that are not theirs to begin with, and they want others to be subjugated for their own personal gain. Marriage is only important to those who believe in the sanctity of it. For gays they just want the benefits of it without the rules. That's like me wanting the interest from one bank while going to another to save my money. 9- same here, and you should stick with your civil union stuff and ask the government for rights like married people do, not force everyone to accept your civil union as marriage. That's compelled speech and against the constitutional right to free speech. 10- refer back to #6. You can't be Christian and pretend that the bible isn't very clear about homosexuality. And I'm not talking about the Leviticus mosaic laws, those were for the Israelites specifically, but the new testament is all too clear on the subject so if you find someone that claims to be Christian and ok with homosexuality, they are either lying to you our lying to themselves. Again, that does not mean you can't be Christian and still love your homosexual brothers and sisters, that just means you don't celebrate the sin. We all sin but us Christians don't celebrate that sin. We are called to turn away from sin and follow Christ. By putting our faith in Jesus we are forgiven for our sins, but repentance (turning away from sin) goes hand in hand with faith in Jesus. 
    1
  33. legna20v I guess you're just blind to the attack on sensible people's sacred beliefs like sexuality and marriage. Created by God for a purpose. Just cause they don't believe in God doesn't give them the right to destroy the things that we hold dear. It's wrong because it goes against the purpose for which they and sexuality were created. If you choose to live on opposition to God he will give you up to your lusts and allow you to live in a deluded state. That's not a benefit. And I don't say this out of hate but love. Just like I would tell a polygamist that we were created in such a way that one man and "one" woman should come together, not one man and many women. Or tell a person engaging in bestiality, to stick to women and not animals. It seems wrong even to mention these other options but they all share the same problem. Twisting of purpose. Whether you believe in God or not, the consequences still apply; and destroy lives.
    1
  34. You added you're own pseudo - science at the beginning of the video. And your mad at discovery channel. I'm not saying there any better but get yo facts straight homie, and leave the theories at home. Don't just parrot what you heard. Find out. All animals would have does out from mutation build up and DNA degradation if any were that old. Find out.
    1
  35. Lying ass. "Fraction magic", program illegally installed on voting machines. People caught filling out dead peoples votes. Voting 50 times already.
    1
  36. Well folks, a true lying fascist. All liars shall have their part in the lake of fire.
    1
  37. I know you guys didn't miss obama telling illegals to vote. That's not legal. I can't go to Mexico and vote. I can't go to any other country and vote. That's not how it works.
    1
  38. So losing something is evolution. I thought things got more complex not simpler. I guess you lose everything until you end up with humans. I wonder how we started out if we've lost stuff until we were left with the bodies we have today. ..lol. i know, maybe evolution is just a fairy tale for grown ups that they've been indoctrinated into since kindergarten. Omg...vestigial tale with no bone or musculature...yeah. ..That's a skin flap not a tail. Not even centered on the spine. Sorry, that's just more bunk to debunk. Evolution does not happen, nor do you have one single example of evolution. Only variations within the original animal kinds. So yeah, you'll get big dogs, small dogs, hairy dogs, bald dogs, short dogs,and tall dogs. ..But you'll always get a dog every time. Same for every other kind of animal. Variations within the kind and limited to that kind unable to mutate far from the original without serious genetic issues. MutatIons are generally bad but you think that's how we got every kind of animal? Is there anything worse than bad observations based on Previous misconceptions. And vestigial structures are the opposite of evolution. You're losing stuff not gaining stuff. Like i said, are you gonna lose everything and that's how we got here?
    1
  39. As if you aren't dripping in Perez Hilton Ballsweat. Freaking hypocritical Libby.
    1
  40. Misleading title. A man made up this explanation.
    1
  41. Lol. .. assumption, assumption, assumption. Losing stuff is not evolution. It's de-evolution caused by the refining of genes over years of "selective" breeding. Sad sad sad. Desperation for an antiquated hoax living on in the minds of people who believe they are programmed to think this way. I feel for you. Question... where did these evolved vestigials come from in the first place?
    1
  42. Aiden Nelson and its all imagination smart ass. You don't know they came from anything changing into something else. Smoke and mirrors don't make good science. And one experiment is worth a pound of theory any day. Any changes in the morphology of organisms are limited to within certain constraints that are never violated without detrimental effects to the organism. And do you really think wet can keep losing things and that's how we got all the animals we see today. Where did the originals come from to lose all this stuff. Again, just a desperate attempt to salvage a ridiculous theory that requires abiogenesis to even get started. If that isn't a good kick in the pants,I don't know what is. A false theory based on a proven falsehood. For shame...
    1
  43. "Racebaiting"; again, vox; those who live in glass houses~
    1
  44. Oh, so you guys want to be part of the fraud charges as well. Cool, we'll see you too.
    1
  45. Notice it's only not normal to liberal main stream media. To the rest of the world, it's reality. It's about time you joined us vox.
    1
  46. We sold it to them. Remember Libya under Obama? Yemen?, Syria?
    1
  47. "He's a liar "? People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Especially when you can be debunked by an elementary Google search.
    1
  48. "If you say a lie long enough and loud enough, the people will believe it"
    1
  49. So..Trump was right again.
    1
  50. No no no. It's called knowing bulls#!t when you see it. Easy rule to staycool. If it's left it's bad.
    1