Comments by "Laars" (@laars0001) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1.  @davidallison5204 You don't need to test a baby's consciousness, it is assumed, like the speed of light and space-time et al. Humans are at the top of everything.
    1
  2.  @davidallison5204  I mean that there are universal constants like light c which doesn't need to be re-proven, it just is.
    1
  3. Let's say it becomes useful in the market, will a quantum computer be rented out by the minute, at what cost?
    1
  4. This is akin to self-fulfilling prophecies even if not intended because humans are programming it with human flaws and biases. It's still programming and detectable because there is no way you can program in experience and the 'something is fishy' feeling.
    1
  5. Agreed! In North America it has died. Neil DT mentioned this at one of his lectures as well, Europe, Japan and Australia ballooned greatly in the sciences whereas North America and a few other regions who never had science just withered to almost nothing. I'm going to lay this squarely at the feet of wokeness, congratulations, your accomplishments in that field have murdered science and physics, but there are high paying jobs at the Woke Corporation right? University of Woke gets everyone great careers? 👍🏼👍🏼👏🏼
    1
  6. Sounds a lot like another more eastern country which spends it's economy on war and corruption rather than maintenance, development, people & infrastructure.
    1
  7. Dim and dum.
    1
  8. Nope, he is an under-medicated tool.
    1
  9.  @unduloid tents are not a good place to raise a family, or trailers 🫤
    1
  10. ...and huge azz ground straps.
    1
  11. Did the experts just figure out that nuclear fuel can cause nuclear explosions? What gave it away, the word nuclear?
    1
  12. If this is valid since it came from the internet, the institutional ethical committee (IEC) is supposed to screen & approve grants. I suggest put a hold on funds and take good time to replace that committee with a completely different system comprised of qualified people and make it transparent Some of the research is ridiculous and obviously just a money grab.
    1
  13. My spin; in the olde tyme days scientists conducted research for self-realization and the betterment of mankind and maybe for a couple pennies, now it is a salaried job for opportunists to get grants and piecemeal commissions hoping to win the lottery and get big bucks, fck mankind Ima gonna own a Ferrari, Lambo and 5 Teslas.
    1
  14. Are these guys trying to say that 2nd hand measurement can be different? How can it be different if our human reality is designed to only measure/observe one way?
    1
  15. Sooooo, storing toxic ammonia materials in vaults underground is different from storing spent nuclear rods in vaults underground how exactly?
    1
  16.  @E1Luch  I am trying to point out that toxic/hazard containment & storage is a safe technology. Demonizing nuclear energy because of spent storage is a straw man argument at best and creates a whole new Industry of Anxiety for absolutely no reason. Thanks for the info 👋🏻
    1
  17. <crickets>
    1
  18. There may be a problem when people less intelligent buy machines more intelligent, one of the 2 gets dusty on the shelf.
    1
  19. 😂
    1
  20.  @ShonMardani  the 'cloud' is an area of the probability that a particle is there. If you cannot detect a moving particle because conservation of momentum says it has to be moving in a straight line: -your detector is broken -you think there is only 1 particle but maybe more than 1 particle is in there bouncing off other particles which you detect, thinking it is a self steering particle -there are particles which detectors have never detected before, get a better detector
    1
  21. Trust me bro.
    1
  22. Maybe the stigma surrounding the word 'nuclear' can be changed if the nuclear process itself can be renamed, maybe something like a 'fission reactor engine' 🤷🏼‍♂️
    1
  23. AI can't make babies which can own AI.
    1
  24. Saturated fat is made the same way, hmmmm.
    1
  25. I won 't be holding my breath for a desktop version then 🫤
    1
  26. ⁠ @Hexapod1112 all diesel on existing trains is to charge up traction motor batteries which propel the train.
    1
  27.  @edwardteach3080 good point! Increase taxation in robot plants by calculating how many people would actually work there; if no like it then dismantle, too bad cya
    1
  28. My first reaction is that scientists have comfortably nested in their cozy funded bubbles and defend with all their feathery blustering. When the golden egg money runs out they will cackle differently.
    1
  29. Really old homes with minimal insulation will have an issue with any type of system.
    1
  30. I always thought they became like HP, suits having Xmas parties 24/7.
    1
  31.  @robertmorrison107 Show me his Engineering degree, I'll wait🫤
    1
  32. Do you get charged for energy delivery loss via transmission lines?
    1
  33. The even more stupid are giving them money hoping to get a winning ticket, it's a payback/return on investment scheme nothing more nothing less.
    1
  34. Trucks have to tow a battery pup trailer behind it, the trailer is behind the pup; exchange when depleted at special charge/exchange stations. It takes time yes to swap out but that's what you wanted so adapt. I'll just wait here for the royalty checks to roll in 😂
    1
  35. Today's version of AI has a bright future in cinema CGI entertainment. Tomorrow's version is enhanced CGI, because humanity hasn't come up with anything intelligent.
    1
  36. Hell no he should NOT get a Nobel prize, maybe a Nobel Clown 🤡 Prize, he can share it with his fellow Clown Putin.
    1