Comments by "Bob" (@bobs_toys) on "PolyMatter" channel.

  1. 30
  2. 17
  3. 17
  4. 16
  5. 15
  6. 15
  7. 14
  8. 14
  9. 11
  10. 11
  11. 11
  12. 11
  13. 10
  14. 9
  15. 7
  16. 6
  17. 6
  18. 6
  19. 6
  20. 5
  21. 5
  22. 5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 4
  30. 4
  31. 4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. ​ @JohnSmith-qk4rm  Mathieu's done a lovely job of responding to most of this. That you've resorted to whataboutism confirms this. (That bad things also happen in the US doesn't change that bad things are happening in the PRC. If anything, it makes it worse as it can lead to a weakness in demand for the PRC's export focused economy's products) A few things I'd add to this, though: 1. Even assuming what you said is just as you claimed (it isn't) you're talking about masses of elderly losing their retirement savings as if it's not a problem. It is a massive problem. Especially in a country with a state pension fund that's expected to be empty in about a decade. 2. That the stock market is viewed so negatively (this formed a part of your argument on why houses are better) is a sign of a sick economy. That lack of confidence is why we've got this massive real estate bubble in the first place. 3. We're on a video that looks to have made a highly accurate prediction about the PRC's real estate sector Now, going back to your whataboutism to finish this off: If the US economy does badly, the people in charge can be blamed and voted out peacefully. There'll be a few bad years, but they'll recover and move on. As happened in 2008. What happens when the PRC economy does badly? What peaceful means do you have of getting rid of the CCP (The people who oversaw the creation of this mess from beginning to end are the people the CCP very enthusiastically insisted be put in place. Their failure is the CCP's failure)
    4
  41. 4
  42. 3
  43. 3
  44. 3
  45. 3
  46. 3
  47. 3
  48. 3
  49. 3
  50. 3