Comments by "Russell ward" (@russellward4624) on "Sky Sports News" channel.

  1. ​ @MONGOL667  it's not even a possibility.
    1
  2. ​ @williampotato1221  that's not even possible.
    1
  3. @Aaron  there's going to be no punishment because there's no evidence City have done anything wrong.
    1
  4. Because that's not how rules work.
    1
  5. ​@x92Vendetta and it's also brought some of the worst because everyone played dead at home. This is the cherry picking fallacy.
    1
  6. ​@justincharles423 no it didn't. The home team played incredibly negative trying to avoid giving up an away goal and win on a tie.
    1
  7.  @thecakecadet8450  what do you mean "now"? The clubs that spent the most before didn't win the league? Battery don't win the league every year because their wage bill is 28xs the bottom clubs in thier league? Man Utd didn't win the league every year with the highest wage bill? Breaking the transfer record left and right? Arsenal didn't gain access to the first division from the jump buy literally buying thier way in? Where have you been watching football? It's always been "bought".
    1
  8. Refs don't want to send off players. The funny thing is the pundits don't either. When the ref does send people off they always moan about using common sense and not ruining the game by sending people off. Bow they're moaning that players aren't being sent off. Lol If the ref did give him a yellow for the first he 100% would not have Givin him a 2nd yellow.
    1
  9. They're spreading all the negativity themselves.
    1
  10. So there's never been corruption?
    1
  11. But the government onky got involved because of the fan response. It was also the sponsors reaction, which again was triggered by the fans.
    1
  12. ​ @alancawfield6549 exactly. Theyve all moaned to death about "consistancy" so they've made the laws so there's no interpretation. Your arm is away from your body its a pen. Then they moan "where's the common sense?".
    1
  13. ​ @Stop.pressuring.meeeeee you clearly don't understand the processs. The PL and eufa don't need evidence to sanction clubs. If city didn't go to court they'd be accepting punishment. That's what happened with eufa. They brought forward a case with no evidence. With many claims they knew were past the statute of limitations. That proves they don't care about their rules at all.
    1
  14. Wenger admits he's got dementia should be the title
    1
  15. Who did they play?
    1
  16. ​ @JimmyLeSpurs  city dont even have 22 players. Theyve only got 19. 3 of which only get onnthe pitch when the game is at least 3-0. This "citybhave 2 11s" is blatantly nonsense
    1
  17. ​@StephenC1908this isn't about ffp. This is about the rule that was inactive this past season despite failing to get the minimum number of votes needed. So no, it wasn't democraticly voted in favor of.
    1
  18.  @garethhayes9982  You dont know what youre talking about. City have absolutely nevr admitted to doing any wrong doing. They have literally denied all wrong doing. Claiming they didnt give over financials is a lie. City were cleared by CAS because there was no evidence. A direct quote stated about 9x's int he report.
    1
  19. After 1 day? Lol
    1
  20. I don't think Chelsea can do that. They are battling to finish top 4. They have to win. City don't.
    1
  21. Klopp has been a failure at lfc.
    1
  22. @greengrass811  the manager can't lead on the pitch and the players set the tone. That's why there's a captain. The players set the standards in training.
    1
  23. ​@davidburke7777 what stuff is garbage?
    1
  24. ​ @steveo4991 yes. There is no evidence. There isn't actually 115 charges. It's 6. Calling it 115 is like saying you receive 20 charges for a speeding ticket because you sped 20 miles. 1 of the 6 is the Mancini claim that was 2 years before ffp even existed so why would City need to hide a payment to avoid ffp before ffp existed? The others theres no evidence of actual wrong doing. It's all interpretation. It's starting with a conclusion that City cooked the books and reading those couple emails and saying "this could fit". But thats not evidence.
    1
  25. ​@surfinbearbeats is that why City have beat Mardrid in 5 of the last 6 games?
    1
  26. So Klopp was a failure.
    1
  27. What do you want them to say? Nothing has changed in the last 6 months. Nothing is going to change for at least a year.
    1
  28.  @gaborkovacs544  get away with following the rules?
    1
  29.  @anurag9425  can they? Why would Dortmund sell him after selling Sancho? They don't need the money and they'd have no chance getting out of the group and finishing top 4 without both. Which costs them 100m.
    1
  30.  @martynshaw972  yea and they'll make 100m with him this year so they make more money keeping him and selling g him for 60m than selling for 150m now. You can't just ignore all the money hell make the club getting out of the ucl group, finishing top 4,...
    1
  31.  @taylorrusso5290  City don't care about sell ons. They don't sell players that are good.
    1
  32.  @boopdeeb9444  I beleive you get 60m for qualifying for the UCL from TV, and tickets sales. Each round you make it out of is more and more revenue. City made 100m as runners up this year.
    1
  33.  @gboi264  but none of them can be signed this year and Lautaro ain't in the same category. Pep has 2 years left on his contract. Would you waste 1 of them to save a few bucks? Plus there's no guarantee you get any of those players cause other clubs want them too. Utd, cfc, Bayern and Real will all be competing for those couple players.
    1
  34.  @taylorrusso5290  again factually incorrect. Utd has now spent more than City. Spend more on wages. Barca spend double in wages and so does Real.
    1
  35.  @MCFC_EDITZ  the problem is Dortmund target young players. They're not going to use that money to buy a couple 26 year old polished players. That's not thier model. Buying 4 18 year Olds isn't going to help them finish top 4. They miss top 4 then those young players aren't going to go to them because playing time in the ucl is what makes Dortmund the sexy destination they are.
    1
  36.  @taylorrusso5290  The fact were not talking about wages is my point. Why does everyone ignore the largest portion of spending a club makes when talking about spending? Wages are the biggest determining factor in a clubs success not transfers. So why the focus on transfers? Oh right because it fits the narrative.
    1
  37.  @taylorrusso5290  that's not true. Man Utd have spent the same as City, more including this transfer window. They haven't been caught breaking ffp. CAS overturned the case due to no evidence. And you simultaneously claimed the PL has found City guilty of breaking FFP, they Haven't and that the case is ongoing. An ongoing case is proof they Haven't found them guilty. You can't find someone guilty during an investigation. The investigation has to conclude for them to even consider guilt. They're working with the same evidence that CAS was working with so they will also agree that there is no evidence of wrong doing.
    1
  38.  @geraldhuallpa9495  afc and lfc as well. Afc will never qualify for ucl again and lfc likely will miss out his year. With covid especially they can't afford the financial loss.
    1
  39. Of course it is. You just don't undertake how it works and the point. It's done exactly what they wanted. Stretched the gap between the top clubs and the rest. Bayernnhas won the league every year since. Juve had won every year until they were dumb enough to buy Ronaldo.
    1
  40.  @RaseYourProbs  who's everyone?
    1
  41.  @geztaylor  so you're a plastic fan.
    1
  42. @geztaylor  you're loterally saying you only support them because of their success in the past. That's a plastic.
    1
  43. ​ @haroutkayabalian8591 why wouldn't they if a club was willing to pay 50m? They can't trigger the buyback and sell him for 50m and make 10m for nothing.
    1
  44. ​ @ThisMf1990 do you think trials just magically occur? That there's no other court cases occuring? The PL had 40k documents. Should they not be able to read them?
    1
  45. @caioxlive1318  and have you seen how rubbish the Brazilian league is?
    1
  46. @caioxlive1318  the league is rubbish. That's why clubs in Europe are so desperate to take your players young before they're ruined by the 18th century tactics teams play with.
    1
  47. @yaaobenewaah1697  they also covered a lot less ground then. Playing 50 games covering 8k and playing 50 games covering 11k aren't the same.
    1
  48. @yaaobenewaah1697  why? The FA cup is the oldest competition in football. Why get rid of that to add more meaningless international games, european club group stage games, preseason friendlies, etc...? We don't need or want more games.
    1
  49. @caioxlive1318  you're talking about a couple games. If they got rid of the LC theyd just add them somewhere else. More ucl games, more national team games etc..
    1
  50. ​eat lfc to the title every year.
    1