Comments by "Hallands Menved" (@Hallands.) on "ABC News"
channel.
-
1
-
Majik0715 Of course they met with Russians, that was never the issue exept in the minds of some dimbulb news anchors. That isn't illegal, either, get a grip. You can easily find the congressional hearings on the matter, even on YouTube, and if you listen you'll find out that the issue was what was discussed! - of course!
Has everybody gone nuts from watching tv? When was meeting Russian representatives at receptions and summit meetings ever illegal? It's annoying, childish nonsense, all of it, and I just can't believe how many have given up on thinking for themselves.
You're just parroting the inane, fragmented nonsense spewed by mainstream media. Look for contexts, patters and connections and think a little until things make sense, please!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jibreel Lomax Trumps decisions on the Middle East, China and the EU were sound and beneficial. He was the first to realize that Erdogan couldn't be trusted to partake in NATO's weapons development.
He knows the climate alarmism is a scam and before the corvid scamdemic, which still isn't more than an average flu-season, he had unemployment at a record low.
Trump was never after free American's weapons, because the result would be devastating: Law-abiding citizens unarmed, but criminals and gangs of course not.
CO2 isn't a problem, pollution is. Handled intelligently, a slight increase in CO2 can support a greening of some of the world's vast deserts. Methods are already developed. China and Saudi Arabia have begun.
Trump is gathering support to block huaway from spying on the western world, stealing technology they for some reason can't develop on their own.
Any leader knows to keep his enemy close. The only way Trump can stop the Federal Reserve from running America clandestinely, is to keep close tabs on the biggest banks, hence Goldman Sachs...
Have you not noticed the coup attempt against a president elect? Not heard MSM, the IC and the democrat top lying their heads off in unison trying to remove him? Ever seen anything like it? Ever asked yourself why? The Russia nonsense and the indictment were ludicrous and dangerous to the coherence of America!
Trump is not an academic, he's an entrepreneur. If you familiarize yourself with the differences in strategies necessary, you'll understand why Trump is quick to exchange staffers with big egos and slow wits.
But it's all very simple. Who'd be insane enough to let Biden run America. I would let him drive a car!
And yet that's what MSM and the DNC are proposing you do...
1
-
1
-
1
-
Karlen Bell Why would you speculate that to be the case? Why would anyone prefer your speculations? You seem to be just parroting the constant MSM Trumpbashing, which would indicate that your powers of judgment are feeble enough to believe their propaganda?
But do you know what investors say about the media? "If MSM recommend something, sell! If they deride something, buy."
They never get anything right and the main reason is twofold:
1. News media believe that the truth is subordinate to The Agenda - the goal justifies the means - iow they lie
2. By lying or slanting or twisting the truth as it continues to manifests itself, they (and anyone who does likewise) systematically erode their own intelligence and ability to discern important patterns in multiple, related events - they have in other words become clueless and the media presentation makes event seem unrelated. Reality is compartmentalized and fragmented.
What MSM do and is create confusion, disenchantment and despair.
Their approach is as moronic as it would be trying to become a chess grandmaster by changing the rules of the game three times daily. Nobody can learn anything in that fashion. But they can create the illusion of being very flexible and clever and hip.
MSM systematically change the perception of reality and thereby change the consensus on reality. That may certainly impact how voters cast their ballots, but that still just leads to unrealistic, crazy and wasteful attempts to fulfill fantasies not rooted in the physical world, thereby bringing us one step closer to complete system collapse.
The truth is viable. It is determined by the laws of the universe. We are equipped to discern the truth and find our way - but to orient ourselves we must have clear facts, well presented that we may rely on without double checking everything...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Confirms Mueller will likely"?! What is that nonsense? That's an empty statement with bad intention if ever. How did Abc supposedly "confirm a likelihood"? Confirmation and likelihood doesn't go together at all. If something is likely, it's uncertain and therefore can't be confirmed by anyone!
Close down these poisonous, fake propaganda outlets!
Oh, and let see now: The president will be given a physical medical examination, right? Does "physicals" include "psychiatric" examination, wink, wink? No, of course not! We know it doesn't, everyone knows, but let's just ask anyway - to imply that the president, who threatens to uproot our nicely running kickback system, is mentally unfit, okay?
No! It's not okay. It's fake, disingenuous, slanted and slanderous - and you know this. You, Abc New, just don't care, because you're still trying to suppress the rightfully elected president - as your plans to oust him evidently aren't going anywhere...
I think your constant defamation and unfounded innuendo should be taken to court asking for a verdict of suspension of broadcasting rights for five months. The flow of money backing your dangerous slander, which is causing segments of the population to have unfounded fears of their own president, is such that a mere fine wouldn't stop your poison.
It's abundantly clear that all leftist media have chosen a strategy of fake slander causing a plethora of forced retractions. But the retractions doesn't get nearly the same coverage as the slander, so the public is left with the impression that you had something bad on the president - even though your allegations proved false again and again and again and ag...
You simply bury the retractions and mention them only the one time. Then it's back to the same grotesque Trumpbashing 24/7 going on year two now. I think MSM need a resounding lesson in ethics. One that makes headlines globally!
1
-
1
-
1
-
fallspeed Yeah, well, you might have to wait some time, then, because you're not answering my questions and I don't take orders from you, whoever you are. But just to mention a few: It claims to know the Podesta emails were "stolen" from the DNC server? Hiw so? FBI never saw the servers? Seth Rich, also omitted, might have leaked those as part of his attempt to stop voter fraud or they might, more likely, have been leaked from an resident agency. It also speaks of key personnel "leaving the Trump campaign" at various times, omitting to say who was actually let go by Trump himself.
1
-
fallspeed No, no, you're clearly the expert. All I'm saying is that I don't trust NSA or any "experts" from the "intelligence community" as you like to label yourselves. Comey the Weasel perjured himself before congress. Clapper is so busy asscovering, he publicly stated two days ago that Trump was so narcissistic, it was a security risk!
Compared to say Hillary's completely clueless self absorbed behavior, that's a hilarious, but also treasonous statement, completely out of his venue or competence to even mention, and he'll be fired for it, I suspect.
Now as for me, I look for patterns, timing and who benefits. And I must be doing well, because I've been right 10 for 10 so far, so we'll see. Perhaps Manafort is screwed. Can't tell. Don't care.
But what this comes down to is a substantial renovation and budget cuts for the intelligence community all together, mainly because people have become aware that you lot do not respect the constitution and the election process.
Essentially you've in some aspects gone rouge and become both too autonomous and too political for your own good and you'll likely see the houses come to their senses or people become very hard to handle, is my prediction.
But in this specific context you're too happy straining at the gnats to even notice the camels. It also doesn't speak well of your discernment that you conclude anything about what knowledge I demonstrate. So far I've only expressed my evaluations. Theres a difference, don't you know?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Toni Hill Deep state are those authorities with dark budgets that neither congress, senate nor the president can investigate. Right now a war is raging within deep state between two fractions, where one maintain the pledge to serve the elected, constitutional government - and by implication the people, while the other hold the view that governments come and go, but national security is their business and doesn't lend itself to scrutiny by such transient blabber-mouths as are politicians. This is evidenced by the increasing billions of dollars unaccounted for primarily by NSA and MIS.
These black operations took off during the Irak invasion, which needed 9/11 to create voter accept and black operatives to maintain the clandestine operations in the Middle East, maintaining instability under the guise of "peace missions".
Conspiracy theories has been given a negative connotation by the same media who folded to deep state control and censorship and therefore couldn't hope to create any meaningful and whole picture out of all the random tidbits they were allowed to report on, but aren't but attempts to find the patterns behind the mess reported daily.
This social effort by private citizens in combination with increasing censorship made journalists move from reporting towards speculation and here we are: All interested parties yelling - not unlike you - that "we know best" - without attempting to share information or investigate?
Nothing new, really. This always happened when regimes lost the people's trust and confidence by empty promises, censorship, panoptic surveillance and lies sprouting lies as lies need coverups...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1