Comments by "André" (@Andre-qo5ek) on "DW News" channel.

  1. because printing FIAT money is meaningless in this equation at the end of the day. all its used for is to bail out corporations ,in other words pay out their bonuses while they raise prices on us. printing money is a symptom not the issue. corporate greed is the issue. unending growth is the the issue. profits over people is the issue. corporate greed, usury, corporations de-valuing labor, intellectual property and over production of bs products, fast fashion and built in obsolescence. corporate bail outs, corporate bonuses and insane profit, price gouging by corporations, hazardous working conditions, environmental impacts by corps, THESE are the issues. stop pretending its our monopoly money that's the real issue. the monopoly money is the scape goat Fox Entertainment sells you all.
    27
  2. greed is the problem. housing should not be commodified.
    14
  3. "why don't we see subsidies also in a sense as a debt that that company now owes to the states" ABSOLUELTY!!! 100%
    11
  4.  @APFist  correct, FIAT monopoly money is just the tool, the legal mechanism to get wealth from the bottom and give it to the top. so what i said stands, the real issue are the corps and their "forever growth" mentality, at any cost to anyone that is not themselves. im not sure why you call all the things i listed as fraud, but i think we just have different definitions or perspectives here. its not fraud when it was designed this way. its doing EXACLTY what it was intended to do. more or less we are on the same page it seeems
    9
  5. finding "solutions" is not the first step. the burden is on the polluters and profiteers not the people. cutting back is the first step WHILE getting 'climate engineers' properly funded. the answer to "techniques and technologies that reduce emissions and accelerate capture / absorption." ... is NOT PRODUCING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE.
    8
  6. this isn't about free movement... it is about over burdening specific areas, not with economic growth, but resource depletion at the cost of the locals.
    7
  7. that parking lot looked pretty big... how about he destroys that and build there, and build UP&DOWN on the existing site? sure this doesn't resolve the bigger problem of MORE CARS... but it doesn't encroach on the forest.
    6
  8.  @georgelilin7753  absolutely not how protesting works. what you described is a parade. protesting IS disruption. and MrChillerNo1 is right about non-violent.
    5
  9.  @diollinebranderson6553  work and jobs... i see who your masters are. i fixed your comment to something rational "{polluting} , this preventing people from {living healthy lives} and {poisoning} people in their{homes} ain't gonna make people revere them"
    4
  10. you're the kind of person that would have liked Germany from 1933 and 1945 too.....
    4
  11. what exactly was your point here buddy?
    4
  12. things not have changed dramatically, things are going EXACTLY as predicted. banks want to risk OPTHER PEOPRELS MONEY and take no risk unto themselves, then take bailouts for being "too big to fail" this is the playbook not a mystery.
    4
  13.  @2DEKAY  it was not " attempted destruction of that painting" ... they even say in this article that it was behind glass. this kind of protest is designed to be harmless.
    4
  14. what are you talking about "Do these activists have any real solutions" .... they want the Paris accords honored and the people holding up held accountable. do you think government and corps should be allowed to break their promises and contracts?
    3
  15. your sentiment is felt. it would be great to see your suggestion, and many others, in actual socio-economic models.
    3
  16.  @arseniyonline1234555  i know i know. 😅 there is always the hope that making a person read back their words and try to explain themselves opens the tiniest crack to their fragile hateful ideologies though. people like this lack such levels of self reflection you have to wanted if they know what a mirror is.
    3
  17. um... what is this supposed to mean though? your comment just sounds racist.... is their a clarification you would like to make?
    3
  18. What lies are those?
    3
  19. unfortunately people all want to go to the "trendy" spots. there really are places in peoples own countries that they should take interest in.
    3
  20.  @keatoncampbell820  glue and traffic is certainly not fare enough. and the repercussions of unhinged destruction is also too far like you said. hinged destruction on the other hand........
    3
  21. ?
    2
  22. ? can you explain who is this situation "hates being human"?
    2
  23. you're like 10 in your picture.. so i'll be nice. yeah... these disruptions were peaceful. do you have a real confusion as to how it is peaceful or just trolling? happy to explain the topic.
    2
  24.  @georgelilin7753  absolutely not. you are categorically wrong.
    2
  25. debit forgiveness for THE PEOPLE not the corps.
    2
  26. police goons. it is an intimidation tactics that cops are using. they are nothing more than legal gangs for the business class.
    2
  27. here is a bit of unspoken truth though, the right is VERY good at discriminating against a group without naming the discriminated group. in this case, besides fighting on all legal levels, i would say the left ought to get as sneaky as the right, learn to level the playing field for disadvantaged people without naming those people. in the mean time, find other criteria to get the same result. this country is circling the drain from the tiny bit of democracy we ever had, which wasn't much to start. can we get a judicial system that works similar to the science community? one where if a policy is dismantled an alternative policy must address the issue it is replacing AND MORE.
    2
  28. ... finally to what exactly?
    2
  29. LandBack... yes, this is not "Apartheid 2.0" ... it is REPERATIONS for apartheid. the fight for land reform is world wide.
    2
  30. .. debit trap diplomacy = corporate raiding , no difference. its a strategy not an accident.
    2
  31.  @nuqwestr  um... what does this have to do with this? are you saying that Elon is allah and we should follow Elons path? or that following in David's path is like following in gods path? or are you saying Tesla is explicitly something mentioned din the Quran? that would be extraordinary. your meaning is un known, please explain.
    2
  32. i'll work "more" if i got paid with the full benefits of the highest person at my job. if ALL employees got paid what the top boss made. yeah people would be encouraged for sure if we weren't treated like cogs in a machine.
    1
  33. "objective truth from some Higher source " only works under one social governance ... totalitarian authoritarianism... your ideology is one of the biggest threats TO democracy ( the thereat that is even worse for democracy is capitalism)
    1
  34. grabbing political opposition? sounds like what trump wants.
    1
  35. to who about what?
    1
  36. according to the right "freedom"=conformity
    1
  37.  @stephenkeen6044  economy ... what's with everyone and this economy lie. the fact that you think the fossil fuel industry is the backbone of the economy scream volumes of who your masters are.
    1
  38.  @stephenkeen6044  this is all neo-liberal nonsense. a) no one is legitimately saying just pull the plug here. they are saying to ACTAULLY enact the Paris accords. b) FUNDING green energy infrastructure and DEFUNDING & stop subsidizing fossil fuel is c) it is only going to cost "so much" because fossil fuel lobbyists in the pockets of politicians. this is exactly why it needs to be made cheaper for green and MROE EXPENSIVE for fossil tycoons. how it is made more expensive.. boycotts, reputation destruction, lawsuits, business taxes, and on the extremes.... wrenches in the gears....
    1
  39.  @diollinebranderson6553  such an articulate thoughtfull evidence based and 100% on topic response. And since you're a smooth brain let me just spell it out for you that... those nice words i just wrote are sarcastic and i mean the opposite. But i do agree with you not to do crack. You know it by experience, i know it by watch people like you though. You might want to seek help.
    1
  40.  @mabuhayproductionltd3627  .. um.. youre defending landlords? maybe... just MAYBE... landlords shouldn't be using people need for shelter as a way to line their pockets. unless you mean landlords are ignorant.. then i would agree with you. landlords do not understand the responsibility it is to hold someone's lives in their hands. if a landlord is in it for money... they need to simply not do that.
    1
  41.  @mabuhayproductionltd3627  there are ethical and unethical ways to earn money... land lordship... is not ethical.. your example of market demands is naive and a childish understanding of the real world. please explain to me. " If the rent is too High?, so nobody will accept it ? Then he/she will have to lower the rent to get an Income (a littel is better than nothing)" ... the landlord has the power.. and the renting is just.. what ... homeless untill landlords lower rent? -- i dont understand your consistency here.... "I think a lot of the Problem in US, is Because a lot of People Earns a lot in High Tech " but you also say "we live in a free country so you or anybodyelse shouldn´t tell people what they should do" and also "That is how Capitalism works," so what is your point with pointing out that some jobs pay a lot? by your logic they are free to make a lot of money on tech and do not have to lower the prices unless the market can't bare it. - see... my point is that life necessities ought not be commodified. that luxury goods are fair game to commodify. housing is definitely in the life necessities camp. most tech is not in the life necessity camp.
    1
  42.  Annoying Commentator  who do you think are the brownshirts in this situation?
    1
  43. he has 1200 sheep .. and has lost more than he can count... so he lost more than half his flock? since we know he can count to 1200 ?? ... i am suspicious on this.....
    1
  44. what are you talking about ... trump is the one that is actively saying he wants to hold his opposition to the fire if he gets in.
    1
  45. does the church not care to crush usury anymore?
    1
  46.  @JCO2002  ok. so your point is that people with jobs should glue themselves to things ?
    1
  47.  @JCO2002  absolutely not. dumb answers need to be addressed and shutdown. you are intentionally attacking this PRESUMED job status of protester's to distract form the intention of the protest, in this case, climate justice. stick to your cave videos. hopefully the activists are able to keep the corps from destroying those caves.
    1
  48. IP / copyright , they have always been a means to protect the elite. they are not there to protect the little guy. generative AI will be used the same, for the elite. it will NOT be allowed to be an equalizer. just like the history of the internet. the internet did not become the great equalizer that it was praised to be. it became an algorithm feed for the elite. scifi writers have been making these warning for 100 years but scifi is not on the peoples reading list.
    1
  49.  @alexanderg1935  they are migrating.. that's good. since your premise is that their birthplaces can not bare the burden of more people they move when able ...... that's .. not bad.
    1
  50. EXACTLY, "companies can't afford this" ... which is why the reporter asked " why should the WORKER take the burden" ... it sounds like the corps are not efficient and need to work on that.
    1