Comments by "" (@VersusARCH) on "Drachinifel" channel.

  1. 5
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 5
  5. 5
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 5
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 5
  15. 5
  16. 5
  17. During the 1st Balkan War, after the Serbian army took what is now North Macedonia from the Ottomans it decided to take its allotted (per prewar allied agreements) Ottoman north of Albania. Due to poor roads and railroad network there it decided to do so with a shipborne invasion, chartering the necesary ships from the Greek government with a rate of 1000 dinars per ship per day to take its troops from the as of recently Greek port of Salonika (which was close to where its troops that took North Macedonia were) to Albanian ports and supply them thereafter. The profit-minded Greeks, naturally picked the ships on the small side for the task and it went on. Meanwhile the Ottoman navy, bottled down in the Dardanelles by the Greek naval blockade decided to send their fast protected cruiser Hamidiye to run the blockade and raid the Greek sea lanes, hoping to lure the Giorgios Avereroff to chase her which would in turn enable the main Ottoman fleet to defeat the Hydras and the rest of the Greek fleet and to break the blockade, but the Greek naval command initially decided not to send anything after Hamidiye. However, after Hamidiye managed to catch a group of unprotected Greek ships offloading Serbian troops in the Albanian port of San Giovani di Medua and sink and damage several causing more than 150 Serbian dead (and it would have been worse had two Serbian artillery NCOs not set up their mountain guns on the deck of their Greek transport ship Trifimia and fired back, prompting Hamidiye to open the range and lose accuracy), the Serbian high command and government complained bitterly to the Greeks about the lack of naval escort. The Greeks then detatched the Psara (which was too slow to catch Hamidiye) and 3 destroyers to escort the subsequent Serbian troop convoys which it performed successfully.
    5
  18. 5
  19. 5
  20. 5
  21. Pre dreadnought fight: in 1904, after the Japanese torpedo boats attack the Russian 1st Pacific squadron at Port Arthur, France honors its alliance with Russia and declares war on Japan, UK honors its alliance with Japan and declares war on France, Germany decides to ally with France (note that they did historically help the Russian 2nd Pacific squadron with coaling) to even the odds and bring down RN (and get some colonies). Austria Hungary and Italy honor the Triple Alliance with Germany and declare war on UK. Finally Teddy Roosevelt, ever the opportunist, sees a good opportunity to gang up with the allies to take down RN and expand. So: you have RN vs Russian 2nd Pacific squadron, the French fleet, the German fleet, portions of the US fleet (plausibly - US contigent sails to Brest) and Italian and Austro-Hungarian fleet. The French Brest fleet and the USN from one side, and the allied Mediterannean fleets sail to break the British Gibraltar station, while the 2nd Russian Paific squadron sails to Germany to break out to Brest if the main RN body sails to help Gibraltar. If the latter stays put and the allied Mediterannean fleets breaks out to Brest, two combined allied fleets, one from Brest the other from Wilhelmshaven sail to jointly (coordinated by wireless) challenge the RN in, a climactic pre-dreadnought battle of Jutland. RN, on the other hand, would naturally attempt to engage the allied fleets piecemeal. Japan meanwhile battles Russia's 1st Pacifific squadron and perhaps some US reinforcements based in Manila (which may, or may not decide to sail to Vladivostok). I think the historians may have missed the significance of France not intervening for Russia in 1904. (out of fear of the superior RN) on Austro-Hungarian decision to declare war on Serbia in 1914. (banking on Russia not intervening out of fear of strong Germany, or at least France not intervening for the same reason).
    5
  22. 00:45:56 Apart from the RN campaign to destroy SMS Koenigsberg in the Rufiji river delta, and several battles in the Paraguay War, there was one river battle (estuary to be precise) at the mouth of the Pearl River during the 2nd Sino Japanese War: From Wiki article on Chao Ho: On 14 September 1937. Chao Ho and Hai Chow (formerly the Arabis-class sloop HMS Pentstemon) engaged the Japanese cruiser Yūbari and the destroyers Hayate and Oite. The Japanese ships were forced to retreat with the aide of the Bocca Tigris' forts land based artillery but both ships were damaged. From www.combinedfleet.com tabular record of movement for the light cruiser IJN Yubari: 14 September 1937: YUBARI is standing into the Pearl River estuary with HAYATE and OITE when they encounter two Chinese warships, the protected cruiser CHAO HO and the revenue cutter HAI CHOW (ex-HMS PENTSTEMON), leaving Humen (Bocca Tigris) Strait. The result is what might be the only surface action between the Chinese and Imperial Japanese Navy in the whole war. [2] The Japanese squadron engages the Chinese vessels and the shore batteries at the forts protecting the Humen Strait. Both Chinese ships are damaged; HAI CHOW is hit three times and loses steering control. This causes her for a short time to be heading directly at the Japanese fleet, as if on a charge. Just as it seems the cutter will be blown out of the water, HAI CHOU regains control. The more powerful CHAO HO inexplicably fights only intermittently, and her captain soon orders a retreat. HAI CHOW manages to escape upriver as well. Ironically, CHAO HO's leaving the battle does her little good: she runs aground short time thereafter. While returning to Taichang anchorage, the IJN squadron is attacked by CAF Northrop A-17 attack bombers, scoring several near misses. Five sailors from YUBARI are injured.
    5
  23. 5
  24. 5
  25. 5
  26. 5
  27. 5
  28. 5
  29. 5
  30. 4
  31.  @Ushio01  Lend Lease was mostly an American show. Had UK even signed peace with Germany in 1940. it would have broken it by 1942 or 3 at US insistence and once the tide would begin to turn on the Eastern Front. Germany did not have the leverage to force an actual occupation of UK and they knew it and didn't insist on it. Hell they even left French North African posessions in their hands (which came back to bite them when those posessions essentially let the Allies invade in 1942 with little resistence). It would have been the same with UK. You even have an example from earlier history: UK actually signed peace with Revolutionary France for a while when the chips were down even though it never intended to honor it for long. The same did not happen in 1940. but had it happened it would not have made a big difference. British propaganda is perverting common sense in trying to overemphasize UK's importance in WW2 that is all. I laugh similarly at their insinuations that the Battle of Waterloo prevented Napoleon from winning. Really? With Prussian army still in the field (and actually deciding the outcome of the battle), Austrian, Russian, Spanish and many other forces marching on France in force yet again, even in the unlikely event that the entire Anglo-Dutch army was utterly routed at Waterlo, Napoleon would still be defeated by those other forces combined. France in 1815. was exhausted by decades of war and even with all repatriated veteran POW (which made up a good portion of Napoleon's forces in 1815) could simply no longer field an army large enough to fight even half of the, now veteran, coalition forces bearing down on it. But had the Prussians managed to smash Napoleon at Ligny, rest assured their propaganda would likewise be bullshitting about how they saved Europe from Napoleon's boot in 1815.
    4
  32. 4
  33. 4
  34. 4
  35. 4
  36. 4
  37. 4
  38. 4
  39. 4
  40. ​1:32:07 Best ship kill to loss from age of steam onward? Consider: 1) steam sloops of war. A lot of destroyed or taken ships, mostly unarmed or poorly armed sailing ships in the mid 19th century and I believe few losses. 2) German camouflaged armed merchant raiders are good candidates too. In WW2: only 9 deployed, 8 lost (of which 1 in an accident and 1 was repurposed as a gunnery training ship before being destroyed by the Red Air Force) and they sank or captured 142 Allied and neutral ships including HMAS Sydney and the RN armed merchand cruiser Voltaire. The total includes ships sunk in minefields they layed. https://www.bismarck-class.dk/hilfskreuzer/hilfskreuzer_introduction.html 3) In WW1 they also deployed armed merchant raiders and I believe those had even better K/D ratio The most successful one was the Moewe (K/D 40:0): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_M%C3%B6we_(1914) And the most dashing was the Seeadler (K/D 16:1 but not to enemy action): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Seeadler_(1888) There was also the Wolf (K/D 27:0): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Wolf_(1913) SMS Kronprinz Wilhelm (K/D 16:1 - interned in then neutral USA, seized after US entered the war) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Kronprinz_Wilhelm SMS Cap Trafalgar (K/D 0:1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Cap_Trafalgar Total (K/D 99:3 or 33:1) but perhaps there are more German WW1 AMRs that I am not aware of. 4) Consider that German WW1 submarines had better K/D ratio than their WW2 counterparts and most probably also the Americans in WW2 but I doubt it amounted to 33:1. Technically a ship class that sank something but suffered no losses is even better.
    4
  41. 4
  42. 4
  43. 4
  44. 4
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4