Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Extra History"
channel.
-
51
-
30
-
23
-
22
-
16
-
16
-
12
-
11
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Consent had always been needed.
Infact Isabella's previous marriage had been annulled on the basis of the fact that she had been kidnapped by Raynald of Châtillon when she was 8, locked up in the fortress of Kerak for three years, forcefully married to Humphrey of Toron, godson of Raynald, when she was 11 (too young for the ecclesiastic law) and, above all, she never expressed consent during the ceremony.
One noble, present to the ceremony (made in haste, when the fortress of Kerak was under siege) testified that and, when Humprey instead said that there had been consent, he challenged him to a duel to estabilish who was right. Since Humphrey refused to fight, the question was settled and the marriage annulled.
Isabella then had not been "forcefully married" to Conrad. She had been persuaded by HER MOTHER (she had been the one that "kidnapped" Isabella from her husband infact. With the death of Raynald of Châtillon she could finally reunite with her daughter) to marry him, and she clearly consented during the ceremony.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1