Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Extra History"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1) Conrad was not married.
2) No law prevented Conrad to marry the sister of the the wife of his brother in 12th century Crusader kingdoms. It was a 9th century Frankish thing. Middle age is not all the same.
3) To "kidnap Isabella from her husband" had not been "Conrad supporters" but HER MOTHER that, with the death of Raynald of Châtillon, could finally reunite with her daughter.
4) Isabella's previous marriage had been annulled on the basis of the fact that she had been kidnapped by Raynald of Châtillon when she was 8, locked up in the fortress of Kerak for three years, forcefully married to Humphrey of Toron, godson of Raynald, when she was 11 (too young for the ecclesiastic law) and she never expressed consent during the ceremony.
5) Isabella had not been "forcefully married" to Conrad. She had been persuaded by HER MOTHER to marry him.
6) No bribe was needed since, of three archbishops presents, two supported the marriage and the third, the Archbishop of Canterbury, was a supporter of Richard, and so simply ignored.
7) Since Richard could make agreements with Saladin, Why Conrad and Guy shouldn't have? It was pretty normal infact.
8) Richard became the first suspect of hiring the assassins due to the fact that one of them, captured, confessed under torture they had been paid by him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The father of Conrad, William, veteran of the 2nd Crusade, arrived in Jerusalem after the death of his eldest son, William Longsword, to protect his newborn grandson Baldwin V (unfortunately, he had not been able to prevent his death). He had been captured at Hattin and, during the siege of Tyre, Saladin presented him to Conrad, threatening to kill him, had not Conrad surrended the city.
Conrad famously replied "my father had lived long enough".
1
-
1