Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "BFBS Forces News" channel.

  1.  @СерхиоБускетс-ф7я  Rubbish.
    1
  2.  @andreykolkov2724  children believe in mythical missiles with mystical powers.
    1
  3.  @johnnyenglish583  Looking at its tiny control surfaces I dont think it can turn much at all.
    1
  4. The glide vehilces can but they have to slow down to do so.
    1
  5.  @Mis-AdventureCH  The shape of the warhead, which has a relatively large cross section tells me it was not designed for deep penetration. Rather, with "some" penetrating capability. Deep penetrators are thin, long devices of a small cross section. Granted, the velocity of the weapon will aid penetration but that has to be offset with a very thick warhead casing, as in Kinzhal. The main constraint for penetrators is the deceleration limit for the design.
    1
  6. The warhead is inside an aeroshell.
    1
  7.  @andreykolkov2724  Which is why Kyiv is a crater filled wasteland isnt it......
    1
  8.  @FugasSPBRUS  Bullsheeeet.
    1
  9. Yes I agree that was probabaly a fragment that punched a hole in the warhead, if the entire mass of a PAC-3 had hit that warhead there would have been nothing to display at all.
    1
  10. They likely have variable fuzing.
    1
  11. Its faster in its boost phase.
    1
  12. No.
    1
  13.  @radionicapcelica5322  Show us the Kinzhal damage to Kyiv?
    1
  14.  @moose4488  there are more who don’t have a clue what they are talking about.
    1
  15. A Patriot battery would slap the snot out of an SU-57 so would a NASAMS unit.
    1
  16. Maintenance issue, they probably settled for iron pellet paint and shaping. From the frontal aspect it looks comparable to other stealth fighters but it doesn’t look like an all aspect stealth fighter. They do know how to build one but the cost of making an F-22 analogue was probably too high a financial burden.
    1
  17.  @ashleygoggs5679 it might be flying near the border using its sensors but it’s probably not flying into Ukraine. It would would get shot down eventually and the debris would be on its way to the DÍA in the USA just like that fully intact T-90M.
    1
  18.  @ashleygoggs5679 from which source? “Trust me bro?”
    1
  19. So basically it’s a technology demonstrator.
    1
  20. It’s so stealthy nobody has seen them, not even at the factory….
    1
  21. Lol sure pal.
    1
  22.  @cryptoeveryday6635 a lot? What are you talking about precisely? You can’t magically attribute kills to a fighter without knowing anything. More likely it was fried and trusted ground based AD systems.
    1
  23. If the SU-57 showed its face deep in Ukraine Patriot or NASAMS would slap the snot out of that beyotch.
    1
  24. I think they bought them because we gave all of our NLAW to UKR.
    1
  25. Also a wake up call for the Army to do something about counter UAS tools.
    1
  26. Lol you need a shag mate 😂
    1
  27. Try sailing around it for a few weeks that's even worse.
    1
  28. They were upgunned from a 20 to a 30 mil main.
    1
  29. Depends on which one of their three eyes you're talking about.
    1
  30. The people don't want the Russians there they had a rigged referendum...
    1
  31. Sounds like Leeds...
    1
  32. Yes, we sent them back home to Argentina in1982.
    1