Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Not against the F-35 it isnt, its a low RCS target.
    68
  2. Already the butthurt comments.
    32
  3. ShadowFalcon They also keep repeating the Fanboy mantra that one F-117 downed in thousands of missions flown , somehow represents some sort of failure of Stealth. Hell if we lost 5 F-117s over their operational life its still a stunning success.
    31
  4. Mango Dzeri and 18 years later, there are still no signs of the destroyed B-2, so, umm, where is it? I am surprised the Serbs didn't claim 10 B-52s.....
    18
  5. Nonsense.
    13
  6. So why arent you on the Islands?
    4
  7. It depends on the ambient conditions, on a flat calm in the open water, not so difficult. You have to remember that not all missiles will work as advertised, inbounds and defensive missiles included.
    4
  8. The Argentine Government just released a map and logo of Argentina with the Falklands Missing in the picture oh how they are crying .
    3
  9. I think it was a decent Op by the Serb SAM operators, those Ops were skilled operators whose job was instructors at the Army SAM school. The USAF made some goofs that helped them to achieve the kill but it took considerable effort. Apart from that, this is all we really know. The Serbs aren't going to say publicly "exactly" how they did it, I have seen some pretty convincing "misinformation" on the topic, as far as the US side is concerned, the report into the shootdown remains classified and has never been published.
    3
  10. You own half half of Cyprus, oh thats all you have of it.
    3
  11. The B-2 doesnt have a real competitor and will not until Russia or China builds a stealth bomber, more likely to be China because Russia is broke.
    2
  12. I dont hold them in any regard whatsoever, they are a show pony and have been since the collapse of the USSR,
    2
  13. MrThePrivateer Heavy jamming will only tell the USN the Raid is inbound. If they want to survive they will fly low, fast and use Tu-22 M3s to take out a USN CSG in a combined arms attack using Subs popping up with AsCMs. The best hope Russia would have is using a sub surface force launching as many missiles as possible to saturate the defences as well as an air attack on different bearings, hell throw in some decoys too.
    2
  14. MrThePrivateer You do not have "lots" of SU`s, not enough to do a saturation attack on 10 Carrier battle groups, its a numbers game pal and Russia does not have the numbers, land bases or IFR capacity to take on the USN in every possible theatre.
    2
  15. MrThePrivateer Ah so your response is based on your complete lack of any tactical or doctrinal , employment, knowledge of any tactical or strategic systems, weapons or formations. ie no fucking Mil experience whatsoever. Go back to your Mikoyan  brochures kiddo.
    2
  16.  @azimy9388  So was Turkey....
    2
  17.  @azimy9388  Tell that to your Leader Erdogan dopey.
    2
  18. What are you planning?? To storm Vienna?
    2
  19. Turkey will never be a superpower.
    2
  20. Turkey signed the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty but I know Treaties dont mean much these days with Putin violating more of then than a Decepticon.
    2
  21. No they do not.
    2
  22. Only Nuclear powered bullshit.
    2
  23. I will tell you, there were no Nukes there, they are kept in holes in the ground in HAS in the USAF part of Incirlik.
    2
  24. The SU-35s speed advantage over the F-35 in most scenarios is a myth since the SU will be hampered by drag caused by external weapons carriage. This will cause range issues, speed and altitude issues thus evaporating this perceived advantage. Remember, the F-35 will be "clean" with every advantage this brings in terms of low drag and fuel savings. What the SU will be able to do is to choose to turn around and extend to fight another day. Also , too many assumptions are being made about the capability of countermeasures on both sides, nobody knows how effective or not they will be. Lastly, if you are going to compare missile PK in 2017 ie, an AMRAAM 120-D with the PK of Gulf War era weapons like the Sparrow which is what was used in 1991, it makes that comparison moot.
    1
  25. We train for this scenario too.
    1
  26. With a charlie load it would run out of rounds :P
    1
  27. SO how long do you think the F-35 is going to leave its bay doors open and how long do you think the F-117 left its bay doors open? How did lancaster bombers and B-17s do with their bomb bay doors open in WW2 then ?
    1
  28. Hernesto L It sounds like he is talking about Football...
    1
  29. I cannot believe some people are still stupid enough to even mention this fantasy.
    1
  30. Shrez4Games I asked the crew of the Cook, and they said you are full of shit, case closed.
    1
  31. Not any more.
    1
  32. Nope, they do not.
    1
  33. THE USN had Nuclear tipped torpedo`s which were retired.
    1
  34. Majority of US air power is carrier based? Dont think so kid.
    1
  35. You forgot about this. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/lockheed/us/products/electronic-warfare/naval-ew/_jcr_content/center_content/image_0.img.jpg/1429022289819.jpg
    1
  36. 21,000 sorties during the war by NATO aircraft and that vaunted 1960`s air defence shot down less than 4 aircraft. brilliant.
    1
  37. "Engagement range". Understand this concept then come back to me .
    1
  38. There is no blind spot.
    1
  39. Georgia Cunningham Lomax To be honest, people are missing the other components in the D Class sensor fit. ESM, EO, the huge rotating thingy on the back etc which all feed data into the system as well as Tac links. As you have said i think, elements can be electronically steered up to 120* even during mast rotation, rotation is FAST enough.
    1
  40. ***** Nope, they are comparing Sea Viper to Aegis.
    1
  41. Georgia Cunningham Lomax Cannot argue with anything you have said, good post.
    1
  42. Against any Skimmer it always has been and always will be.
    1
  43. ***** He said submarines not DDGs.
    1
  44. Well yes but if the Escort was in a CSG they would have to contend with the CAP and the E2 `s first.
    1
  45. MrThePrivateer Its a pity there are too many Arleigh Burkes for Russia to handle, in 10 more years there will be 100 of them.
    1
  46. MrThePrivateer You were butthurt enough to go look at my profile page, I count that as a win Admiral Dipshit.
    1
  47. It would take only one Trident SLBM to fix with Boris Johnson as the unitary warhead. Kill 2 Birds with one stone.
    1
  48. They didnt steal them , they were a gift from the US, and the UK supplied the Plutonium on behalf of the USA.
    1
  49.  @azimy9388  I doubt either of your assumptions.
    1
  50.  @oghuzkhan5117  If Turkey starts detonating Nukes it will be a glass parking lot, doing that shit has consequences. You cant control fall out clouds you`ll probabaly irradiate your own population.
    1