Comments by "" (@Josh93B93) on "DW News"
channel.
-
24
-
21
-
15
-
9
-
8
-
7
-
The funny thing with your comment is the trench gun was proved mostly useless in the great war, and there are no actual kills attributed to it from the conflict, so maybe not the best analogy to use, likewise there needs to be more nuance in "who's the aggressor" in the lead up to the first world war, Both France and Russia as well as Germany and Austia-Hungary were taking aggressive actions against each other, securing military alliances at the sake of their neighbors, believing that these would act as a safeguard to prevent war, where in the end it dragged the world into war because of contractual obligations to both the entente and the central alliance, war was inevitable not because of any one side being good or bad, but because the decisions that brought the world to conflict were being advised by those who stood to profit the most from the bloodletting, weather it be Renault or Krupp in the past or Rostek and General Dynamics today, there is no such thing as ethical consumption or expansion under capitalism, conflict between the west and russia has been inevitable since 1991 with the fall of the soviet union and the rise of a capitalist russia.
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@kingsleykester8167 Why did you think that? It was never stated as a war aim to take Kiev, let alone in two days, western pundits predicted that, the same pundits who sailed russia would be out of ammo "any day now" last fall, your analyst suck, shame on you for being blind to it, Russia could afford to lose Kherson and Kharkiv alot more than Ukraine could afford to lose Mariupol, Severodonetsk, Lysychansk, Slovyansk, Mariupol, and now Soledar, and at the casualty rate Russia still holds a serious advantage over ukraine, it can replace the troops it's losing in these battles, Ukraine is struggling in that regard.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2