Comments by "Fernando Jackson" (@fernandojackson7207) on "J-TV: Jewish Ideas. Global Relevance." channel.

  1.  @AustraliansStandingWithIsrael  Amazing point! You really showed us. Now head back to parroting things you know nothing about.
    129
  2. British Colonel Richard Kemp has testified to the same effect.
    14
  3. ​ @paulboyhan4602  Defending Israel while minimizing civilian deaths doesn't make one unstable.
    12
  4.  @tubthump  To start with, said territories aren't occupied. According to Geneva, Occupation takes place when the hostile/occupying army replaces the government of those occupied. It includes physical presence by the occupying army. No such thing is happening, as Gaza, Area A, have their own respective autonomous governments, and, pre October 7, there were no Idf troops patrolling either region. Just what aspect of self-determination are non-Jews being denied? There are Arab political parties; many condemning Israel, Arabs in just about every profession , even a Muslim Arab was appointed to the Israeli Supreme Court. Seriously, you ignore much worse in several countries, how hamas abuses Gazans, but condemn any little imperfection by Israel.
    9
  5. ​ @gheller2261  NGOs like Unwatch may be able to do that or similar. They've already started a process to have Francesca Albanese to stand down based on her violation of UN ethical rules.
    7
  6. ​ @maltija1  So did Colonel Richard Kemp.
    6
  7. ​ @meggraham7564  Never won again? What about 1948, 1967, 1973. And Jews had been living there for centuries before Islam even existed. And there has never been a Palestinian state. Try again.
    5
  8.  @tubthump  No such thing in gaza, according to the actual meaning of the term: An organized effort to destroy a race, group. When you provide advanced warnings of attacks, allow in aid; when several non-Jewish military like Richard Kemp, John Spencer, John McCall testify Israel is keeping within International (Humanitarian) Law, the claims are, to say the least, doubtful.
    5
  9. ​ @zehnerevans7063  No. There is no ocupation by virtue of definition by the Hague Convention. Territory is occupied when it's placed under the authority of the army of the occupier. But there was no Palestinian land to occupy, as there has never existed a nation of Palestine.
    4
  10. ​ @ziad_jkhan  There was no such displacement. If there was, just how do you explain the current 1.8 million Israeli Muslims?
    4
  11. ​ @ziad_jkhan  It does not limit Dna tests.
    4
  12. ​ @mikelundmikel4006 Do tell. Israel has free speech and a free press, to help the truth come out. Tell us of any such thing on the Palestinian side, where those who disagree tend not to live too long.
    3
  13. ​ @meggraham7564  Land was not occupied, as no nation of Palestine existed then, nor had ever existed. You can't occupy something that doesn't exist. International law; Utis Posidetis Juris, grants the land to Israel.
    3
  14.  @ziad_jkhan  Please provide 3rd party refs to such laws. They are preferentially treated in some ways, such as in not being required to serve in the Idf, unlike Jewish citizens.
    3
  15. There's no occupation.
    2
  16. ​ @1seafisher  Please be specific on what is false in her account.
    2
  17.  @Rasengun_MP40  Israel tried to negotiate , Arabs refused. Please provide actual references. Palestinians were given Jordan. Jordan, Kuwait, forced them out. And, I guess you oppose groping, but not the mass rape of October 7?
    2
  18.  @capello85  There are two others. Namely John Spencer, Richard Kemp. And the UK is hardly an unconditional supporter of Israel. But you provide no 3rd party evidence nor references yourself.
    2
  19. A lady that worked for the UN ( I think her last name is Ewori) , who disagreed with the claim that Israel had comitted genocide somehow failed to have her position renewed. Hmm, wonder why.
    1
  20.  @johndriscoll157  Since UNRWA requires its charter to be renewed periodically, let's lobby so it's not renewed next time un in 2026.
    1
  21.  @tecumseh821  And its life expectancy at birth and literacy rate icreased, while infant mortality has decreased.
    1
  22.  @paulamarsh1  Well, they're at least 75 years old by now.
    1
  23.  @chrisbamborough222  I think UNRWA defines anyone who descends from someone who was displaced during that period, to be a refugee. This includes 28 year old bella haddid, born in DC, and worth some $23 million. Among many others with nationality from 3rd countries.
    1
  24.  @GrantCoppin-Brown  Some went to Jordan, other Arab countries, who forced them out. Jordan revoked their nationality. But Israel bad.
    1
  25.  @harley5qw1-sz8wt  IIRC, bella haddid, born in DC in 1996, worth some $23 million, is, to the effects of UNRWA, a refugee, and, as you said, entitled to claim refugee status. Same for thousands of others with nationality in 3rd countries. Given UNRWA needs its charter renewed to keep operations, let's lobby so it's charter isn't renewed next up in 2026.
    1
  26.  @SDMNKhan  I bet you have evidence to that effect. Explain to us then, just where the current 1.8 million Israeli Muslims came from. 7 Arab countries launched a genocidal war in 1948, and lost. Have them move on. When you launch a war seeking to destroy a war , you better win. Let alone Arabs forced out 850,000 Jews.
    1
  27.  @SDMNKhan  Several of your Arab countries forced them out. Jordan revoked their nationality. Talk about ethnic cleansing. Then Jordanians cleansed Jews from Judea and Samaria.
    1
  28. ​ @JohnChristenNizzaDiCorsi Dignity? They were given Jordan and own 99.6% of the ME.
    1
  29. ​ @jakecross4628  Just when has Israel " expanded"?.
    1
  30. ​ @jakecross4628  Stealing ? Who is, by what account? Complicated given Oslo is likely not in effect.
    1
  31. ​ @jakecross4628  Hmm, do tell us about the basis for land ownership. Any deeds, treaties, etc?
    1
  32.  @jakecross4628  And yet you're not demanding any such rights for the millions that have been displaced. In particular not for the Kurds, Assyrians, etc., displaced by the creation of Syria, Iraq, are you? Nor for those Finns displaced from Karelia, nor ethnic Germans, Bengalis, etc. Right? It only seems to upset you when Israel is involved. Utis Posidetis Juris sort of annuls that because there would otherwise be endless discussions to settle boundaries. The world is an imperfect place. Let alone Palestinians were not displaced by local Jews. Arabs launched a genocidal war and lost FA FO.
    1
  33.  @jakecross4628  Local Muslims sold their land by their choice, no duress. They were also not forced out. Arabs' nakba account has been, well, embellished, to say the least. Unlike, in ww2 alone, millions of ethnic Germans, Karelian Finns, Bengals. Seems their plight doesn't upset you much.
    1
  34.  @jakecross4628  Well, you're bringing up the issue of Israel while ignoring others. Even the natives whose land was taken, did the same to each other periodically.
    1
  35.  @jakecross4628  And you're chiding Israel for (supposedly) doing the same that has been done hundreds of times. Just compare a world atlas from 1936 ( before ww2) and one from today. Just about every square mile has switched ownership. Let alone the narrative of the nakba, of Jews forcing out Arabs, is questionable.
    1
  36.  @jakecross4628  Just what horrible thing is Israel doing now?
    1
  37.  @jakecross4628  This is the absolutely horrible thing they've done? Just what settlements are there outside of Area C, where the settlements --a word never used for other countries--are legal? Several Israelis want to live in their ancestral land ; notice, Judea: Jews and, after Gaza and terror attacks in J&S, don't trust Palestinians can be peaceful. Why do you think no one wants to take in Palestinians? Because they bring about chaos with them wherever they go. Just how many Palestinians have been killed, tortured, etc., as a result? Palestinians have repeatedly violated Oslo? Really, hate Israel if you choose, you don't need to make up excuses for it.
    1
  38.  @jakecross4628  Israelis can build in Area C. Many of these " settlers" are people who returned there in 1967 , after being _ forced out of their homes; with temples defaced. Others have lived there for centuries and were equally forced out in 1948. But some rabble-rousers, who haven't killed anybody are really that evil to you, seriously? Israelis aren't allowed into Area A. Those who entered by accident were killed. But rabble rousers are unacceptable to you?
    1
  39.  @jakecross4628  Btw, those are actions by individual Israelis, not by the State of Israel. I wonder if the repeated attacks by Palestinians against Israeli civilians upset you at all.
    1
  40.  @jakecross4628  No. How does that address my previous comment? The land between the Mediterranean and Jordan does belong to Israel by International Law; Utis Posidetis Juris.
    1
  41.  @jakecross4628  Israel has kept its original area since 1948. Really, you're desperate to pretend to have a basis . Just hate away freely, no need to pretend you have a valid reason.
    1
  42.  @jakecross4628  What about her?
    1
  43.  @jakecross4628  Yes. What, you will select someone you dislike to condemn Israel?.
    1
  44.  @jakecross4628  Before going into a rabbit hole, she doesn't represent nor speak for the State of Israel. Do you know many of these current settlers were forced out from their land in 1948, by Jordan, land which was given to Palestinians? Will you request a right of return for them?
    1
  45.  @jakecross4628  That ambition is not " by Israel", but by a few. Rather, Israel itself has offered to return gaza; offer which Egypt rejected, and has actually returned the Sinai Peninsula. It was actually Jordan who forcefully took Judea and Samaria, Israeli territory by International Law ( Utis Posidetis Juris)which was never fully returned. I'm not surprised, though, that you're condemning Israel for supposedly attempting something that has not materialized for 144 years. Or for attempting something before it existed. Not surprised. This is a standard you don't apply to anyone else. Again, many of those " settlers" were born , or descend from others born in Judea and Samaria, from which they were forced out.
    1
  46.  @jakecross4628  And Israel as a whole is responsible for what a few say? Just what point are you arguing for in here?
    1
  47.  @jakecross4628  Israel did no such thing. Arab armies attacked in 1948 and many fled due to the war or to the encouragement of Arab leaders. Unlike Jews; 850,000 of which were forced out of Arab countries. And thousands of Jews were forced out of Judea andSamaria, when Jordan illegally occupied it in 1948. Besides, millions had been displaced in ww2 alone, yet never used it as an excuse to lead constant terror attacks.
    1
  48.  @jakecross4628  You wonder, given Jordan and Kuwait forced them out; Jordan revoked their nationality, why aren't they leading terror attacks against either? Arab countries forced out 850,000 jews, and Jordanians forced out Jews from Judea and Samaria, when they illegally occupied it in 1948. Millions of Europeans were displaced in ww2. None have used that as an excuse to rape and murder. How do you figure?
    1
  49.  @jakecross4628  Who said they were? Why aren't you upset at their being forced out? Nor are a good chunk of Palestinians indigenous to the Levant. Their last names tell the tale. Nor is that relevant to the Mandate System.
    1
  50.  @jakecross4628  Even if true, irrelevant to Utis Posidetis Juris. Palestinians have essentially no cultural connection to the Levant.
    1