Comments by "stream2watch" (@stream2watch) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. Any week now huh?
    15
  2. "Some kind of kampfgruppe". Godwin's law say that you are a bit of a do uche, vatn-ik
    10
  3. Russia has literally only gained 60km2 in one year. Seems to work perfectly fine
    5
  4.  @Сан4о-ф5ф  Nope. That does not include Wagnerites, Donbabweans, Lugandans, and other types of dodgy operators.
    5
  5. Streamrolls a couple hundred metres huh. Besides, you need to own up to your failed Kupiansk Russian offensive video, you perma-hurt Serb.
    5
  6. Much like your face, this aged poorly
    5
  7.  @aeye9772  " See how military cemeteries have grown in Poland. " Crazy people are amusing
    4
  8. Yep, always.
    4
  9. Yeah, their tank turrets join the airforce.
    3
  10.  @yellowtunes2756  Did you even see the pics? That Storm Shadow went in one side and blew up inside it. Do you have any idea how complex submarines are? You have a child's level of understanding of these tech issues (and spelling).
    3
  11. ​ @yellowtunes2756  It was sunk and it was destroyed. People rose from the deep from a torpedo room that was on fire. Take the L and move on destroy verb past tense: destroyed; past participle: destroyed end the existence of (something) by damaging or attacking it. "the room had been destroyed by fire"
    3
  12. We need a video on the failed Russian Avdiivka offensive. At least 30 tanks killed since yesterday
    2
  13.  @rmdomainer9042  Reported for terrorism.
    2
  14. FYI, regarding your Kupiansk video a couple weeks ago, Russia is now at NEGATIVE gains. Meaning they lost more from their push. You should make another video about it 🤣
    2
  15. LOL at using Iraq invasion invader/defense ratio to draw conclusions about this war. Keep on clutching at straws.
    2
  16. Russia's winter push totally fizzled out though. It is amusing
    2
  17.  @Сан4о-ф5ф  "then the Russian army should not remain on the territory of Ukraine" That is a false dilemma. Ever studied THAT concept before?
    2
  18.  @Сан4о-ф5ф  Sorry, I do not recognise random russians as authorities on anything except mediocrity.
    2
  19.  @JohnDoe-wt9ek  You did not make a proper post, so you can not make demands for a proper response. Post a solid argument or stand there, looking like a teeet
    2
  20.  @AgentDoubleOSeven77  "will CSTO members provide assistance now that their Article 5 was triggered" That does not apply to wars where the CSTO member is the aggressor.
    2
  21. Meanwhile, in the real world just outside Kupiansk that the dodgy serb above made a video about about a month ago, losses shown in one video alone shows these Russian losses: - 1 destroyed T-90M; - 1 damaged and abandoned T-90M; - 1 destroyed T-80BV; - 3 destroyed Т-72B3M obr.2022; - 2 damaged and abandoned Т-72B3M obr.2022; - 1 destroyed T-72B; Total losses - 9. Plus 1 destroyed BM-21 Grad MLRS. All accumulated over the last 2 days. Check Special Kherson Cat and other sources for the pics. Seems like your previous video diatribe needs to be updated, 'cause you're not bad faith right, vaaaaah tnik? Seems like those battlelines have not moved for more than a month, right, vaaaaah tnik?
    2
  22. Unbiased lol. This guy is a serb. I have never encountered an unbiased serb (or contemporary scientist, musical act or writer worth their salt)
    2
  23.  @Dysthmic_Danny  And ignoring the serbian genocide against others is of course being unbiased? (inb4 hurr durr it did not happen)
    2
  24.  @CyrilSneer123  So? Are you playing Sid Meier's Civilization?
    2
  25.  @CyrilSneer123  And we see 10 Russian tanks lost there on pics alone in the last 2days. Great plan. Learn how war is fought ffs (still a hilarious statement, I had to repeat that for fun). Pray tell which units have been moved there from the south: You know we can track all units, right?
    2
  26.  @yellowtunes2756  LOL. Child. 450kg of high explosive in a small compartment is not hindered by any metal door. Phew. Learn elementary physics.
    2
  27.  @yellowtunes2756  LOL, you completely utter waste of 0xygen. A sub does not survive a torpedo hit either. Have you even seen the post strike pics of the sub in drydock? I have. Now what in your basement level understanding of physics differ when it comes to pressure due to water, and pressure due to a confined space?
    2
  28.  @yellowtunes2756  LOL. Give me one example of a submarine that has survived a direct hit with 250-500kg HE torpedo. You can not. You're dismissed.
    2
  29. ​ @potatoto8278  Speak English. Deal with your loss. Look up Broach Warhead too.
    2
  30.  @yellowtunes2756  Apples and oranges. My request was for "one example of a submarine that has survived a direct hit ". What you produced was not that. Are you confused about the English language again?
    2
  31.  @yellowtunes2756  No. They are literally the same thing. Your poor knowledge of the language ruins this conversation (again). So you have no example of "a submarine that has survived a direct hit ". That is what I have been saying all along
    2
  32.  @yellowtunes2756  "few cables and metal sheets to make it move again?" Please bring your dad to the computer. Thank you for confirming that you have not watched the pics. Guess they are censored where you live. Let me tell you what they look like. The Broach warhead has entered aft of the conning tower. Gone into the hull. 450 KG of HE has gone off inside there. Folded the hull out from the inside. The blast wave has travelled past two compartents, ruining even the control room, then piereced the hull again forward of the conning tower. I know you run your Lada cars until they are not recognisable anymore but this is a sub. Phew.
    2
  33.  @ruhtraeregel  "they can hit it with artillery and air support without suffering the same. " Fundamentally untrue. Russias artillery is quite short ranged. That is why they lose short range TOS1s every other day. They have little else.
    1
  34. Serbian psych disorders and cu c ko ldry since the fall of Yugoslavia?
    1
  35. Yet Russia has gained nothing in a year
    1
  36. Yeah, maybe Putin could stop launching missiles on towns he claims to be part of his lebensraum. Just a thought...
    1
  37. How did this prediction work out for you?
    1
  38. Indeed. Never trust a serb on the interwebz. The abject failure of their nation over the last century or so shows in everything they say.
    1
  39.  @Сан4о-ф5ф  "no one cares about your opinion" Ditto, that is why your numbers are irrelevant, as well as your claim to be an authority here. Now jog on pari ah
    1
  40.  @Сан4о-ф5ф  Nobody asked you for your analysis or numbers, pa ri ah. Go buy eggs.
    1
  41. I would like to see a critical analysis of this serb's mistakes over the last year. So many predictions that went wrong.
    1
  42. "not being bias" must have another meaning inthe butthr-t belt.
    1
  43.  @sebastiandelgado430  LOL no. This is barely a history channel. Don't ask a serb to report on anything fairly if it is younger than 1980. Too much btthurt in that nation. Too much failure.
    1
  44.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Nope. They actually lost more than they had when their "offensive" started.
    1
  45. Careful there your edge is showing, mor-on.
    1
  46. LOL Ruscist. Hope 2023 is your last year. When will you go to the front?
    1
  47. Why would the Donbabweans (DPR) give you accurate numbers? Makes no sense.
    1
  48. We can see Russian equipment burning all over the horizon near Avdiivka. Serb shill-porks won't mention that.
    1
  49. This is western media.
    1
  50. It does not cost you much, no matter what Tucker tells you. As a matter of fact this war is still a massive trade gain for the US.
    1