General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
stream2watch
HistoryLegends
comments
Comments by "stream2watch" (@stream2watch) on "HistoryLegends" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
@againstviralmisinformation510 Classic bot username too. Got a counter-point? We see Russian tanks burning while you show us M113s .
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 No valid arguments there. I am amused you believe they are. Besides, "the west" does not make statements. You sound simple.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 A valid point is one that is devoid of fallacies. What constitutes a fallacy has been categorised since the ancient greeks. Look 'em up.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 "the west" does not talk, first of all. It is not a person. It does not have one opinion either. Nor has it made such a statement as you claim. Russia's acts on the other hand are determined by a single person. Get it?
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 There is the fallacy. The west does not state anything. It is not a person, or an organisation. Nobody official speaks in Russia unless they toe the line. If they do not they go Prigozhin or Girkin's way. I am amazed that I have to tell you this. Your points have now been proven invalid.
1
This is only the beginning of Russians needing to grift for survival :)
1
What nonsense, Legit source or shush.
1
@grigoris.7732 defense politics asia". You are being manipulated by shills. They post a couple of dingbat, seriously biased channels, and pretend they are not. One can for example see a bunch of people that post the same shill channels in the same order in posts like these, they go "there's McGregor, Ritter. The Duran" blah blah. It is manipulation out of India or Africa and we are all victims of it.
1
"there motors" You had one job to do, genius.
1
We got some new videos of burning Russian zerg-rush equipment near Kupiansk today. This serb made a video about the glorious Russian push there more than month ago :) This individual has no intellectual stringency or ethics.
1
Why do you people always use lose and loose as if they are the same word? Says something about your education level @yellowtunes2756
1
@yellowtunes2756 LOL, you completely utter waste of oxygen. A sub does not survive a torpedo hit either. Now what in your basement level understanding of physics differ when it comes to pressure due to water, and pressure due to a confined space. It's like you haven't even played with firecrackers before facepalm I know several languages. More than 3. You do not even command English. Moot point. Classic fallacy.
1
@yellowtunes2756 I have not answered your language question. because it is a fallacy you mu-ppet. I know several. Moot point.English is not my first language but I command it better than most natives. You would not know. Are you Indian? You sound Indian.
1
@yellowtunes2756 250kg warhead, not 450. Ancient HE. Not internal. Hit at surface level. Ripped open every compartment except a torpedo room. Not repairable. Did not survive. Proves my point.
1
@yellowtunes2756 Nah, you are still too slow. Or you do not know English. I believe both. Did you even read up on the sinking of the USS Tang? It was ripped to shreds. People rose from the bottom of the deep from a torpedo room that was ON FIRE. It was sunk and it was destroyed. I do now know how many times I can try to teach you this elementary English lesson. Take the L and move on. destroy /dɪˈstrɔɪ/ verb past tense: destroyed; past participle: destroyed end the existence of (something) by damaging or attacking it. "the room had been destroyed by fire"
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All