Comments by "Yester Vue" (@yestervue4697) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

  1. 4
  2. 4
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9.  @rgg.x1  ~ The secret is bigger than that. Look up where two of the most off-limits places that are to go see are on the earth and can only be reached by flight or sailing. Both are internationally banned from us going there to look. These conversations here are just scratching the surface... ~ Do you believe the Bible at all? The actual reality is genuinely in there. It describes it in detail. That is one of the biggest secrets and it is in one of the forbidden locations where we can walk up to it and see it and touch it, and that is why we're barred from seeing those places. Byrd and Tesla went and actually measured something there that they are hiding, it used to be in Encyclopedias before 1958 but they took it out after the treaty was used to "off-limit" those places to the whole earth. ~ How do they convince you it is round? Well, before you ever even try to think about the concept...like years before, what is one of the first things they show you in kindergarten all over the world. They are donated free to every school too... ~ Ever wonder why they call some things what they do? Like Extraterrestrial for instance? It means "extra, of earth/earthly" actually but it is beat into our heads to mean "from another earth, and not this one". ~ We know better, we have eyes and can see the truth when young quite easily...when we reach young adulthood...they use ridicule and separation with humiliation to get everyone in fear of asking again or questioning things. Like how you can make billions of tons of water stay in the air effortlessly floating in a cloud bank overhead...but then we argue that water can stick to the ocean and not somehow fall off of a round sphere. They use the fear of ridicule and separation to pressure you into a narrative. ~ That by the way...with the eyeballs thing is really kinda sad logic to use if you think about it. Have you ever seen what the globe would look like if you removed all the oceans from it? Even their model is not at all rounded...it looks like a smashed-up piece of gum that's been thrown away...not a sphere. The ocean's surfaces make their model look round, not the planet shape underneath it. ~ Hey, for a quick "things that make ya go hmmm" experience lookup real quick at the logos for the United Nations, and the World Health Organization. Notice ANYTHING odd about them? Have you ever seen that anywhere else? Look the logos up though...very easy and fast to do! Big hidden right in plain sight clue there! ~ You pretty much have to look these things up on your own or you'll never believe me just telling you. You will have to see with your own two eyes. In every paragraph above is something easily searchable, kinda clue l like in other words. I am only trying to make folks think and look for themselves and quit just blindly accepting everything they tell us is true. We all agree the world's governments are shit and lie constantly about everything to us taking advantage at every turn...yet will defend the "science" they dictate/control/teach us and start a gunfight defending that as the gospel truth. That is some pretty inarguable very confused bias at work...cognitive dissonance makes us mad at first though so it is expected. We all went through that when first starting to really understand the world around us... I promise I am only on an enlightening mission...everyone just wants to fight through...conditioning makes us all hostile to one another...I may not be tonight but I will be back soon...Good luck!
    3
  10. 3
  11.  @tejaswaindayskar6547  Absolutely not...I love, believe in, and adore science. None of anything I ever said at all is an argument against it in any fashion show or form...period...never even suggested it remotely. Science is a process to discover knowledge. You do know Admiral Byrd was accompanied by Tesla on the High Jump mission right? You do believe Tesla is one of the greatest scientists to date right? Did you know that before 1958 you could actually look up the firmament in encyclopedias? And in the listing, it actually has the measured degree of the angle it comes up from the earth because it was actually physically measured on that mission right? All this is true, but removed from all textbooks....why? It is actually a concerted effort of science to disprove God...not the other way around. Why if Tesla is basically the father of the modern era...is he not taught in school? I don't mean mentioned as he is only...but taught and in-depth like Edison is? I am saying to look for yourself...everything anyone has ever posted here in rebuttal is not once been taken from anyone posting from their own work at all. it is quoting what others tell you is supposed to be fact, not from anyone's methodic observations and experimentation. It is merely parroting what we have always had repeated to us. This is WAY bigger in proof for alternate evidence but this is blowing everyone away so deeply here with this light end to the subject I dare not dive in any deeper and further repel readers. I keep saying look and observe at the obvious in front of you. You keep saying no, listen to what the textbooks and professors all say. I came to my mindset through more than2 years of trying to determine the truth...not reading others' works and taking only that into consideration. https://i.pinimg.com/736x/14/99/93/1499933c3cd5816aa680bd0ee5e0c616.jpg
    3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. To make a car go around a corner (a radius) you have no other option at all but to make the car turn a radius to follow the one you want to navigate. Period...can't happen any other way. But for some reason, people who think the earth is a sphere, have no problem thinking that a plane does NOT have to operate the same way...and it unquestionably would have to whether anyone likes it or not. If the earth IS a sphere, it has a surface that is a radius and not a straight line as in a flat earth. SO how then do you make a plane use a straight line to navigate around a sphere? You could only do so by having to occasionally or steadily adjust the plane's pitch angle to go "over" the horizon as it progressively curves downward and away from (a radius) the plane's flight path. Yet every person that argues this with me clearly states that a plane does not and would not have to do anything to adjust for that if the earth truly was a sphere! Baffling yet true! Here, we'll put it in a way that most are familiar with as many have experienced this first hand. Take a car at high speed, and approach a hill at that speed. As you progress "up" that hill (the inclined side of that radius as you travel toward it) the car's momentum wants to keep it going that same path. So when you reach the apex of that radius, the car tries to become airborne...and leave the surface because it wants to keep traveling at a straight trajectory. But the front end of the car "points downward" or FOLLOWS THE RADIUS of the hill or it would become airborne, and if fast enough for several yards. Planes are bound to the exact same laws of physics... (PS Physics ARE called LAWS as they are proven so that's why they are not called THEORY btw...like the "heliocentric theory, and "theory of gravity" so on) Just because a plane does not touch the surface of the RADIUS as it travels along over its surface at a maintained altitude it will without question still have to "curve" its flight path downward to stay that altitude or it would just start gaining altitude. The ONLY way to navigate a radius is with another radius and that also applies to planes...period. A straight line and a curved line cannot ever, ever, ever run parallel to one another. Definition of parallel : extending in the same direction, everywhere equidistant (see equidistant sense 1), and not meeting parallel rows of trees The earth looks like this from a high elevation, it is NOT spherical at all. The use of a fisheye lens makes the faked appearance of a curved surface. The earth is flat...look... https://www.bitchute.com/video/HjxMJkOeg5Xs/
    2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28.  @randyschissler5791  No real modern Christian Church even follows scripture either...I am a former minister I guess you could call it but hate that title. Rather liked to teach what I learned...not lead others in the scriptures. It is what made me stop teaching. I have read the Bible end to end three times in sequential order of books and many times out of order all over in research/studies. Mathew 17...enter through the narrow gate! Many will come to him in the end and most will be told "I never knew you..." I was never a "Preacher" or a "Pastor" leading people to salvation etc...no fire and brimstone messages, no focused topics based on current events and the like. I taught the hard studied and bitter to swallow truths right in the Bible. Not popular as you could imagine except with the Pastors, and Preachers. And no ad-libs...I read straight from the book with a dictionary and linear translations from the old Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and made listeners follow along with word for word to show I did not stray from what was written. No one wants to hear the truths today...they only want comfort and to be told that they can do as they wish and still limbo under the standard...even if they know it is a lie they are hearing. Try being a Bible teacher in rural Arkansas and telling a congregation that Moses's wife was a Midianite... from what is now called Ethiopia. Then point out that in his day and time...there were pretty much only Black people there, and that Moses himself was likely not very "white" in appearance...he quite likely had a very dark-skinned wife! Crickets from the pews...
    2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33.  @9WEAVER9  Well, that isn't related to what this question was intended to lead one's train of thought into, and without clairvoyance, you can't see where I was going with this. You missed the boat as everyone does by getting SOOO caught up in merely being challenged with a question that makes one think about what they think they know and riled to the point of just "pointlessly and forcibly disagreeing" all along...they never even really thought about shit they were saying at all. You guys act like angry chihuahuas, you have no thought train attached or point to make, you think you must just somehow disagree at every turn no matter the route of discussion as agreeing with anything would make them look stupid...you are one of those. You think it makes you look stern and immovable but really translated into "I am uncomfortable having anything I believe in challenged...so I go straight to mouthy insulting behavior right outa the starting gate"! When you were in school if your teacher asked you a question that made you think and challenged common belief..were you the kid always yelling 'Well I don't get it so fuck you, man!"? Cause that is essentially your behaviour here...are you a teenager or something like that? SOOO, ""YES"" EXACLTY THEY HAVE NO DIFFERENCE! THAT WAS ENTIRELY THE POINT BEING MADE TO OPEN A WINDOW INTO A THOUGHT PROCESS...YOU JUST SLAM WINDOWS THROUGH IN AN ACT OF DEFIANT REBELLION TO EVEN JUST BEING QUESTIONED... CAN YOU SAY "REALLY FUCKING INSECURE WITH YOURSELF"? Grow up I mean seriously...you talk like a punk! Go away until you can act like someone remotely fucking reasonable and stop being such a bitch about things...really...damned internet juveniles!
    2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36.  @et.anthem  IF YOU DO NOT READ THIS ENTIRELY YOU WILL AGAIN MISUNDERSTAND THE DILEMA I AM POINTING OUT, PARTIAL READING TAKES IT OUT OF CONTEXT AND IS THEREFORE ERRONEOUS IN RESPNSE. You will never make a flat level trajectory (straight line, flying along at zero degrees pitch in attitude) be able to follow and trace just above a curved surface ever. You must without any doubt have to "curve" the flight path to trace it, as the "curve" of the sphere that would be constantly falling away (angeling downward) from you as you proceed forward, so the flight path cannot follow that any other way but to have to constantly adjust the angle in a downward fashion, or descend as it goes along. Straight lines and curved lines are impossibly and forever will be unable to run parallel to one another. Think very hard about that very inarguable fact...and the answers everyone keeps giving, they never add up. The only way for it to do so is to "warp" the laws of physics to make a globe work in the model...and that is not true at all. That realization is the objective...not who is right on flight physics...this is a sphere vs flat plane debate and has always been so. Planes never do that, they never make constant downward adjustments to keep them from leaving the atmosphere eventually,. And even if they could not physically be ejected from it they would still wind up brushing the edge of space in flight eventually if they maintained a perfectly level orientation. Cars jump/become airborne topping the crest of a hill if they do not travel "down" or point the front of the vehicle down the ascending opposite side...the exact same applies to any aircraft if the earth's surface is also curved or essentially just a much bigger hillcrest. Ask any pilot...that is exactly what I repeatedly said...ask a pilot for proof.
    2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2