Comments by "TheEvertw" (@TheEvertw) on "The Critical Drinker"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@j.ceasar Having the right to spread opinions that hurt others is called Freedom of Speech. There is no right Not To Be Offended, it doesn't exist.
People take offense at certain opinions, that is an active choice. THEIR choice.
Now, if I dehumanize or demonize specific people groups, or incite hatred against them, that is NOT (or shouldn't be) covered under Freedom of Speech. Except in cases where a higher body has judged the situation, as in calling Trump a rapist or Hamas a terrorist group. Those are facts, established by courts of law / government bodies. But having an opinion that clashes with your opinion, that just means your opinion is wrong. Usually. Because I think my opinions through and am open to correction. But dehumanizing me for my opinion, that is actual hate speech -- which is done far too often by people who get offended by someone's opinion.
So we have the weird situation where many people use actual hate speech because they accuse someone else, falsely, of using hate speech. That has a name, and it is HYPOCRISY.
Case in point: J.K. Rowling. Those who rail against her often use hate speech, while I have NEVER caught her in uttering actual hate speech. She does pose questions, and points out where women are endangered by policies that promote rights of trans people. But that is healthy debate, NOT hate speech.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What is happening at Disney is so outrageous, I am starting to believe that this is exactly what its leaders want it to be. Next question is, WHY?
I don't for a second believe it is because the higher-ups want The Message to permeate the world. That is what the underlings want, but not the higher-ups. Disney is controlled by some of the most wealthy individuals and organisations on this planet. And they are ONLY interested in money.
So, they believe it will financially benefit them to drive Disney into insolvency by letting it make stuff nobody wants. That does not compute. EXCEPT if in doing so, they can protect their other assets. Which, I believe, would be by triggering an anti-woke, pro-fascist movement that is too distracted to vote for parties that would reform tax laws to make the ultra-rich pay their fair share.
We will see what happens next. If for example Kennedy stays on, and this Headland creature, this conspiracy starts becoming more plausible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1