Comments by "TheEvertw" (@TheEvertw) on "A Different Bias"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@richardcory5024 And that is the difference between a mature, professional Parliament, and the amateurish farce you have going on. Why let a PM insult Parliament and waste its time by not answering the question?
According to convention (in your case) or the Constitution (in mine), Parliament is sovereign. The government answers to Parliament. Not answering Parliament or answering in a misleading way is a grave insult to Parliament and by extension the nation.
Also, MP's sit in Parliament on the authority of their Constituents / Voters, not on the authority of their party. This means that it makes absolutely no difference which party the MP asking a question belongs to.
In my country, all MP's can always ask questions to the government, during debates or in writing, and have them answered. Refusal to answer in a timely manner or giving misleading answers are sacking events for the minister in question.
This is what is fundamentally wrong with UK democracy. It has forgotten that the government works for Parliament, and that it is Parliament's job to scrutinize the government, and it is government's first responsibility to submit to such scrutiny, regardless of party politics.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3