Comments by "Biały" (@Bialy_1) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @romulus1969  He only said that reactor was a female and you ovvereacted and blowed up misogyny at him... "Just calm down!"
    158
  2. "Dont do a meltdown test during a fn shift change" they didn't. In previous shift there was a guy in charge that got proper understandong of the topic and that is why the test was planed for that shift. But they got the shortage of power in the grid so they did not allow for the test during that shift. The new guy was just not qualified for the test, it have nothing to do with shift change.
    28
  3.  @Broken_Yugo  Hehe That joint was for me an instnt weak point when i saw it and you only need a very basic understanding of conection betwen forces acting on the material and its deformations to understand why this connection was designed by someone who should never have received an engineering degree... This whole glue never fulfilled any function because it simply couldn't, it would have to have better mechanical properties than both of these materials to survive the deformations it was subjected to. But laymen would probably realize more quickly that this is a death trap if there wasn't that glue "to glue things together"... -> the pressure was doing the job here but the metal conection was designed by someone with ZERO understanding of the topic...
    19
  4. Well, Mirosław Hermaszewski flew aboard the Soviet Soyuz 30 spacecraft in 1978. He was the 89th human to reach outer space...
    19
  5.  @Jundl77  "at most the airplane and whatever it crashes into is destroyed." so when the airplane is crashing into nuclear reactor then what? You need to think harder... And no the nuclear reactor is not some super bomb that can just like that destroy whole continent...
    10
  6.  @cravinghibiscus7901  "AFAIK the soviets were very open handed about sharing technology" yea right, that is why over 100,000 of people in USSR were senteced to death or Siberia(less humane way to kill someone) for spying for western countries... only real cooperation was with Germany(Kampffliegerschule Lipezk, Panzerschule Kama) and ofc training facility for chemical weponds... Germans started WW2 in tanks made with Soviet metals, they were trained in Panzerschule Kama and burning soviet oil, to burn Europe to give Soviets excuse for intervention. Even Tupolev got into trouble for his flight to USA with his AN-25... and lets not forget "An Experimental Design Bureau (Russian: Опытное конструкторское бюро, Opytnoe konstruktorskoe bûro; ОКБ), commonly known as a sharashka (Russian: шара́шка, [ʂɐˈraʂkə]; sometimes sharaga, sharazhka) was an informal name for secret research and development laboratories operating from 1930 to the 1950s within the Soviet Gulag labor-camp system...".
    9
  7. Mirosław Hermaszewski flew aboard the Soviet Soyuz 30 spacecraft in 1978. He was the 89th human to reach outer space. So it looks that Poland can into space.
    8
  8.  @mennol3885  "When doubled in dimensions the walls also need to be twice as thick to hold the pressure." HAHA Internet specialists... ;)
    7
  9.  @bob45  also birdshot moving with that speed gonna have 21x21=441 times more kinetic energythan typical birdshot... and that is why it is so deadly even if it small piece of some aluminium alloy.
    6
  10. "won the deal with ussr to move planes from exhibition to exhibition" silly idea that USSR would be using private company to do that... Soviet military pilots would just fly it from one place to another and not leave it unprotected for a minute... " in 1 night, they dismantle 1 tupolev 104 engine, took pictures of every parts and reassembled it." you can not learn much in one night when dealing with something as compicated and it would be crazy hard to even take it apart in that short time so no time to study anything/test it... on top of that USSR engines(like Mikulin AM-3 that was in Tu-104) was simply crapy and that is why USSR Tupolev-95 was using Kuznetsov NK-12 engines with contra-rotating propellers... and Russia is using it for exsctly that reason to this day... That book is clearly full of stories invented by this guy to make this book interesting and he have no understanding of technical aspects of stuff like that or any understanding how communistic countries work/operate... USSR or any other country behind Iron curtain would not use private company to move plane from one place to another even inside Russia... its just silly idea and solid prove that this story was fabricated.
    6
  11. -ski is the end of Polish family names... Russians have -ov
    5
  12. They not want any chance that something gonna end up in hands of people that they dont like, noone there will be complaining about free tech...
    5
  13. The movie is a good example how uneducated all the writers in Hollywood are. Even the most basic things in this movie are wrong, like for example calculations of the next encounter. The 10 years old should be able to get it right that if one vehicle needs one and half hour for full orbit and the other is moving in oposite direction then every encounter should be every 45min... and physics in this movie? Oh boy, basic Newton laws? Nope, to hard for Hollywood writers.
    5
  14.  @arctic_haze  Well, i was not alive back then, but i was able check out soyuz reentry capsule during some event on Ławica airfield in Poznań and once i got the plesure to exchange greetings with Gen. Hermaszewski in WOSzK „Gronik”(Military Training and Conditioning Center in Zakopane). 😉
    5
  15. And as a result, no one can repeat it now... it would be even more telling that the program was resumed by Bush Jr. so long ago that most of the commentators here do not know who he is, and yet nothing is ready for the next mission(apparently 400,000 and only thieves who took everything home from work... 🤣). This layaout of landing gear sucks -> but you can't even suggest that, because 400,000 people worked hard on it at a time when computers were so powerful that it would have taken them months or even years to count everything that happened during the landing in a few minutes.
    4
  16. MACH 1 is 1/3 km per second = 6 times slower than 2km/s. Kinetic energy is mass*speed*speed*0.5 So if demonstrator speed is 1unit of speed then its kinetic energy is 0.5units of kinetic energy and with speed of 6units(2km/s) the kinetic energy will be 18 units so the demonstrator is doing less than 3% of the kinetic energy... MACH 1 is the limit for most helicopter rotors tips as you do not want to have part of the rotor blade going supersonic and part of it subsonic. The whole demonstrator looks like a scam for people that have money but do not want to do the math...
    4
  17. Yea, Russians just gonna watch and doing nothing when USA is instaling net of 10.000 starlink statelites that will allow USA to use its military drones all over the world with no need to risk live of any soldiers or even move them anywhere... clearly someone in Russian military is not ready to swallow that bs that USA is wasting billions of money on starlink to give people in 3rd world countries access to facebook and twitter... heh
    4
  18. Your urina explanation is in fact shit explanation... :P
    4
  19.  @dajhrm  "you could be considered at least a mild expert in Nuclear Physics" in comment section full of "internet specialists"... in real world you are specialist or not.
    4
  20. "5m diameter and around 30 Engines (Booster included)." My biggest was something like 92 or 98 engines and it was like 30 or 40m wide, my old computer got problem to handle all calculations in the real time so during lift off it was like 10-12 seconds in real life to get 1 second in game. I used as first stage engines that was working as jet engines in air and then are able to switch mode in vacum. Whole thing was puting in orbit rocket that was as big as saturn 5...
    4
  21. So during this comet next approach? ;)
    3
  22. "Failure should never be a possibility due to human error." it wasn't. For the test they switched off all the safety that would not allow this situation to appear. On the previous shift was the guy with proper understanding of everything and he should be the one operating the reactor with all safety systems switched off...
    3
  23. Then replace engineers with marketing team... this move will increase the chance of success...
    3
  24. That Soviet woman was a cosmonaut not astronaut... hehe
    3
  25. " he was there looking out the window" haha, yout theory literally failed at the launch platform with this...😅 You have a camera but you have never seen photos of this vehicle that you have such an idea that you could look there through the windshield during flight?🙃
    3
  26.  @marcuswright5577  Nope! He is talking about the Nuclear Wessels... in Alameda! :P
    2
  27.  @GreenBlueWalkthrough  "The first Rifles have big heavy Bullets that should go clean though modern day body armor and the guy behind him. " no they would not. You have competly no idea what are you talking about. Speed of that bullets was poor... any armor able to protect you from modern day 12-gauge shotgun slug would be also able to protect you from "first rifles" "heavy bullets"... You would need some XX century 12.7mm armor piercing amunition to do what you are describing here...
    2
  28. All vehicles used to test/learn ground landings crashed -> and in them the pilot had quite good visibility and recognizable objects around him to assess the distance/speed of movement(contrary to lander where he was surounded by walls and facing wrong direction(space)). So Mark 1 eyeballs proved beyond any doubt to suck big time... These stories are all the more credible the less you know and the less you analyze, and the worst thing is that, as can be seen from the last example, modern designers fanatically imitate this old layout thinking that "it worked so well a few decades ago"->If they revealed the truth there would probably be a backup system in case of a hard landing...
    2
  29. Most of the junk in space is from usa...
    2
  30.  @FastSloth87  How OCnStiggs personal test was making the whole thing any safer? He was not the one that would give the order to use it and people able to give it was not "under the Personnel Reliability Program (PRP)"... on top of that you know how many accident USA alone got that were conected to this type of weponds? The answer is: so many that USA managed to lose 6 devices and to this day they are unaccounted! I can bet that in USSR situation was much more grim, just compare the Three Mile Island accident to the one in Chernobyl... By claiming that the guy is 16 you trying to convince us that this 87 in your nick is not your date of birth but your IQ score?
    2
  31.  @lukefreeman828  The actor playing it is SJW and in the movie he starts as a wimp and gets power via magical science... Sean Connery is a legend and the best Bond in history when in comparison Captain America guy is just "Captain America guy" hardly anyone can see his picture and tell you his real name...
    2
  32.  @ImieNazwiskoOK  Thing is that "real astronauts" are in orbit for at least one full circle... if its just short jump up then why not call an astronauts someone that was in High-altitude balloon?! View similar, no atmosphere to breath and you can also easly add experience of weightlessness to this type of flight.
    2
  33.  @bob45  Space station is doing 7.66km/s and "regular birdshot" is doing 0.365km/s. So anything on the same altitude as ISS is exactly 21 times faster than typical birdshot.
    2
  34. This object elliptical orbit is very flat so there is huge difference in speed during this body travel, its moving super slow when its far awey so any boost in speed when it is close to the Sun gonna give it more energy to fly awey even further where influence of the sun gravity is super small and that is why they predicting this 1.5x longer period, so far awey even small change in speed gonna do huge difference because it already have almost enough energy to leave the Sun for good. If you want "better explanation" then find proper video or article about it or go and play game Kerbal Space Program. ;)
    2
  35.  @DavidEsp1  There was no trained response... all trainers that were build crashed instantly when pilots were trying to control it... this training was considered too dangerous and the program was stopped before anyone managed to learn anything... additionally, this trainer was made so that it was easier to look around in it (and there were objects on the ground whose size the pilot knew, so he could use them to assess the distance and speed of movement).
    2
  36. In the old days i was flying 1300+ parts rocket on my AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ and saying it was "slow" would be an understatement. In first stage it was 60 seconds of real time to get one second of in game flight... ;)
    2
  37. And properly "informed... about 9/11" thinks that freely burning jet fuel can melt steel? :D There is so many idiotic official truths about it that its hard to choice witch one people believe and is most idiotic.
    1
  38. Imagine what they gonna found out about it in next 100 years! Propably will be produced again and as popular as iPhone today.
    1
  39.  @JoeZUGOOLA  "seems less BS to me" only if you were not interested in the subject and did not know that all the trainers crashed within seconds when the pilot tried to control the flight (and on the earth he had better visibility and objects whose size he knew so he could use them to estimate the distance/speed of movement).
    1
  40.  @MattH-wg7ou  "the contrast between the design of the truck and the U2, or even fighters of the day, is pretty stark as well." Yesterday I saw a photo from Beijing during the Vietnam War, showing four U2s that failed -> so i suspect it failed against Chinese air defense -> a country where at that time the most popular means of transport in the countryside had four hooves... Over the USSR the same, U2 had a system that was supposed to ensure it would fall apart so there would be no evidence... not only did it not work but the Soviets copied spy technology from it and used e.g. special kodak film for their space projects -> the hidden side of the moon was photographed by the Soviets first -> with American film...
    1
  41.  @vgeniirshf8913  "In fact, in the first minutes Dyatvlov couldn't believe what had happened" in first minutes noone got any idea what happened so your " thoughts" that he "couldn't believe" are just sily as he did not have any source of proper information to believe in it... looking at the situation from position of someone that have all the knowledge that we have now have nothing to do with situation of people that was in that control room near reactor that just exploded. And the guy in charge was incompetent that is why the test was planed for previous shift when the most competent guy was in charge. "After graduation, he worked in a shipbuilding plant in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, installing reactors into submarines. During a nuclear accident there, Dyatlov received a radiation dose of 200 rem, a dose which typically causes mild radiation sickness, vomiting, diarrhea, fatigue and reduction in resistance to infections. (...) His fourteen-year experience working on naval reactors in the Soviet Far East made Dyatlov one of the three most senior managers at the Chernobyl station. Dyatlov supervised a test at Reactor 4 of the nuclear plant, which resulted in the worst nuclear plant accident in history. During the accident, Dyatlov was exposed to a radiation dose of 390 rem (3.9 Sv), which causes death in 50% of affected persons after 30 days, but he survived." how the hell you can have so much experience in the topic and in the same time do not have solid understanding of that topic? Or at least enough understanding to be aware of your own limitations in that topic? How the hell you can agree to be in charge of two reactors and in the same time have no clue when the reactor is in unstable condition (like when: you need to pull-out all control rods to make it work...)? And you blaming HBO that they did not portayed him as a competent guy... heh
    1
  42. Whole point of starlink is to give huge military advantage to the US military so i do not think that you reading that message properly... if you think that someone is paying billions of dolars for 10.000 satelites to give some poor people in Africa access to the facebook and youtube then you have no idea how this world works. Not to mention that this internet can be considered good option only in 1st world country like USA where internet is as bad as in 3rd world country but 10 times more expensive than in 2nd world country because ISP market is completly monopolized.
    1
  43.  @233kosta  Yea you have no idea what are you about... There is a good explanation of the topic on "Illinois EnergyProf" chanel. The fact that the operator was complete moron that allready got some accidents on his resume(btw. in the NAVY) is not a foult of reactor design. "Although there was a standard operating order that a minimum of 30 control rods was necessary to retain reactor control, in the test only 6-8 control rods were actually used. Many of the control rods were withdrawn to compensate for the build up of xenon which acted as an absorber of neutrons and reduced power." US design with operator that stupid, not aware what is going on in his reactor and on top of that with zero regards toward safety procedures=>recepie for disaster(US reactors of that generation included). The only thing about chernobyl reactor that is not typical for that period of time is fact that it can work on crapy fuel as the pile of fuel is so big(so you dont need to lose time and energy on fuel enrichment).
    1
  44.  @DehimVerveen  STOP beating a dead horse... ;)
    1
  45. He said that they are working to this day and 1986 is far awey behind us so how do you get to "always over reacting" conclusion? Maybe you are also not as stable as you think you are? For example why u writing here about your gf problems? Video about Charnobyl reactor is kinda strange place for that kind of help... :P
    1
  46. Also: July 10, 1970 ; from Łeba ; altitude 100km ; Rocket name: Meteor 2K ; mission: Test flight
    1
  47. Hydrogen... he is talking about it in the video.
    1
  48.  @OCinneide  It is a spaceship not a car, they dont need to get out of the capsule 5 seconds after landing like in every Hollywood movie and have oxygen with them... ;)
    1
  49.  @oldmandoinghighkicksonlyin1368  He did not said anything about NASA... so why u writing all that excuses that we need decades of preparations? Just use kickstarter and lets do a challenge like they do with Mars rovers. People that suported the project on kickstarter can then choice team or teams that gonna use the money to do it 10 times faster than NASA.
    1
  50. Yea because starlink is for poor people in 3rd world countries that are in pain as they lack facebok and twitter not for american military so they can use armed military drones on the other side of the planet... heh
    1