Comments by "Graeme Peters" (@graemepeters5717) on "Firstpost" channel.

  1. As usual, there are claims supported by zero evidence. Since only a fuel tanker and the tail of the plane it was fuelling was damaged, it is unlikely a large drone (explosion) was involved - simple logic! The drones could have been launched by rogue partisan saboteurs (as with the Crimea airbases - nothing to do with Kiev!) a couple of miles from the airfields. It was certainly NOT the jet-powered type that numerous pundits are claiming! 'long-range drones. 1000km range' - total wishful-thinking bullsh*t! Ukraine hits 2 targets in Russia and Russia targets 17 in return! Zelensky doesn't learn!! Now you see WHY, Zelensky is not to be trusted with long-range missiles! It's interesting that Kiev claims to have shot down 62 of 72 missiles, yet Russia states it hit all 17 targets. Someone is not telling the truth! Also note that Kiev would rather 62 missiles landed on civilians than hit their intended infrastructure targets! NO Russian missiles targeted Kiev in the last two attacks. Minsk II Agreement: a ceasefire, withdrawal of heavy weapons from the front line, release of prisoners of war, constitutional reform in Ukraine granting self-government to certain areas of Donbas - which Kiev was violating - the reason Russia stepped in! There is the Alley of Angels monument in Donbas for all the children killed by Ukrainian shelling of civilians - Nazi supporters must be SO proud of the UA, who even targeted a bus full of civilians, last week, in Donetsk City centre (where there are NO military targets) with a HIMARS!
    1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1