Comments by "On The Piss" (@On_The_Piss) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. TIK wow good rebuttal
    3
  2. Bill Me “what exactly are you referring to when you mention anti-social things Hitler did to other parties and people?” Did you really just ask that? Wow
    3
  3. ATLpunk1986 LOL, that’s a nice opinion you got there. Next time provide an argument with some evidence rather than your long winded, emotional grievances with what you personally believe socialism to be, while totally ignoring historical evidence. History doesn’t care about your personal opinions about that conversation between Hitler and Strasser. It happened. Sorry. No one cares if you dispute it or not. I’ll repeat this since Cleary you missed it: Mario Rossi you’re embarrassing yourself. If we are to go off your brilliant logic and seemingly ever changing definition of socialism, then I guess LITERALLY EVERYTHING IS SOCIALISM. I’d like you to name a modern country that ISN’T socialist, by your own definition. Go on. According to you guys, any state that has a regulated market, social services like public health or infrastructure is socialist. Ancient Rome was socialist cos they paid taxes and built roads. The UK is socialist cos of the NHS. This is a BAD ARGUMENT and it’s getting very aggravating explaining this point every 5 minutes - but this is what TIK wants. He wants to obfuscate and confuse this simple point. He wants to make German industry seem like it was socialised because it was under the sway of Hitler - as if Hitler represented the german people and not just a subset of racially pure Germans and capitalists. It’s a disingenuous argument. GERMAN HEAVY INDUSTRY WAS PRIVATISED, NOT SOCIALISED. It was in the hands of a small group of capitalists, and Hitler himself. Hitler did not represent the community as a whole. He represented a racial subset of that population only. Everyone else was ignored or murdered. While Germany may have had social services made available only to a racially segregated section of its population, does that make it socialist? The UK has many social services even today - available to everyone - not just aryans, so is the UK also socialist? Of course not. That is a dumbdumb argument. Stop making it. PS, go fuck yourself. It is the right that is desperately attempting to distance itself from Nazism. Those of us on the left do not attempt to associate Stalin with the right, yet you call literally any governmental system you don’t like “socialism”. Totally disingenuous and frankly, weak.
    3
  4. Nils Vos oh look he didn’t answer.
    3
  5. Athenian Privateer except for the monarchy in North Korea. Really the dumbest take I’ve read in a while.
    3
  6. One word: “Privatisation”. One word that objectively proves your argument wrong on every level. But hey, keep making your little YouTube videos or whatever.
    3
  7. Paesan Control Centre what do Jews have to do with anything? We’re not discussing Jews, we’re discussing “socialist” Nazis privatising their industry.
    3
  8. Sound Addiktion how about you breathe, relax and go fuck yourself instead?
    3
  9. Lev Murynets good luck with your one-man voluntary Union, I’m sure you’ll get a lot done.
    3
  10. “The truth”. Anyone who claims to know “the truth” is not an historian, but merely someone with an agenda.
    3
  11. Haha, encouraging debate on one hand, insulting people in the comments sections for presenting a debate on the other.
    2
  12. TIK yes they fucking do. You just delete their comments and mine. Why are you deleting comments TIK?
    2
  13. Jason Buford Private schools also cost a lot of money and are more than many can afford, so that doesn’t really solve anything - in fact, it makes things worse. They simply shift the cost from the government to the parents. What’s the difference?
    2
  14. Jason Buford yes, because 5-6k is for one person and 10k is for society as a whole. Which is cheaper in the long run? An educated society or a selectively educated society?
    2
  15. #StickToTanks #HistoryNotOpinion
    2
  16.  @oriprogamer1404  it also has one of the strongest labour union forces in the world, safeguarding higher wages. But you omitted that for obvious reasons
    2
  17. “Ancient Athens was also socialist, coz I says so” - TIK
    2
  18. Kameraden #StickToCosplay
    2
  19. Kameraden mature like a grown adult watching anime and dressing up as cartoon characters? Ok
    2
  20. “To increase its appeal to larger segments of the population, on the same day as Hitler's Hofbräuhaus speech on 24 February 1920, the DAP changed its name to the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei ("National Socialist German Workers' Party", or Nazi Party). The word "Socialist" was added by the party's executive committee, over Hitler's objections, in order to help appeal to left-wing workers.” If Hitler was a socialist why did he not want “socialist” in his own party’s name?
    2
  21. rick beniers he seized power from Britain. He was not elected by them.
    2
  22.  @coonhound_pharoah  … you just made my point for me. “Within Libertarianism, Rothbard represents a minority perspective that actually argues for the total elimination of the state. However, Rothbard's claim as an anarchist is quickly voided when it is shown that he only wants an end to the public state. In its place he allows countless private states, with each person supplying their own police force, army, and law, or else purchasing these services from capitalist vendors. ... Rothbard sees nothing at all wrong with the amassing of wealth, therefore those with more capital will inevitably have greater coercive force at their disposal, just as they do now.” Sounds great. 🥴
    2
  23. FrostySumo another great comment!
    2
  24. TIK Keep ducking and diving, you coward
    2
  25. Shadowfanification “yeah” I already explained that Nazi economics were racist and selective, and therefore not socialist by definition because socialism inherently encompasses all, not a select racial group like Nazism did. That’s the point here, German industry was privatised not socialised. Nothing you’ve said has disproven this, nor TIK. I’ve already addressed everything you’ve said in above comments regarding selective racial communities and how nazi society worked. Just cos you think I’m ignorant doesn’t make it so, sorry. Btw, no one seems to be hitting the like button under your arguments. Many have liked mine. I’m not high and mighty off YouTube likes, but it still says something doesn’t it... and it’s not like this video is a leftist echo chamber... lol Maybe you didn’t understand my point, so instead of retreating to petty insults like you’ve frequently done so far, try to actually contribute to the debate with some arguments and evidence. Or just fuck off. Either or. No skin off my back either way. You sound arrogant and condescending, which makes for a poor argument anyway.
    2
  26. TIK is purposefully obfuscating his argument into 5 hours precisely because he knows it makes less educated people think he is reputable.
    2
  27. The 80's Wolf 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  28. Loose89 I’m not presenting an “opinion”, I’m presenting a fact. German industry was not socialised, it was privatised. German industry was not owned and controlled by the community as a whole, it was in the hands of a small group of German capitalists and Hitler himself. That isn’t socialism. The defintion of socialism as we know it today is quite clear and the Nazis do not fall into that definition at all. Sorry. BTW I’m not the one trying to revise history, TIK is. I’m not the one that made a rambling 5 hour video based on a flawed premise, TIK is. I’m not the Born again ancap trying to distance his own ideology from that of the Nazis, TIK is. Good day.
    2
  29. He used a YouTube personality as a source and his definition of socialism from which he bases his entire video is from a libertarian historian whom many disagree with.
    2
  30. Bob Hartley hahahahaha. Yes the Nazis were actually just pretending to be right wing, they were actually secretly left wing the whole time. Stalin and Hitler were secretly best friends both working towards world socialism. Pull the fucking other one mate. No wonder you flunked your university. German means of production was not socialised, it was PRIVATISED. It was PRIVATELY OWNED. Full stop.
    2
  31. Karl Quetzacoatl that’s cos you have a fundamental misunderstanding of it, which is obvious.
    2
  32. TIK since TIK refuses to tell anyone what his degree is I guess a made up title would be a more apt accreditation for him.
    2
  33. William Bowen it’s really not as complicated as he would have you believe, despite 5 hours of attempts to overcomplicate the subject that should really be able to be “proven” in half that time. This is historical opinion, revisionism, nothing more.
    2
  34. TIK yup, your clickbait video is getting lots of clicks. $$$$$$
    2
  35. Legbreaker I’m not the one who wasted 5 hours of my life on a politically slanted clickbait YouTube video. Good comeback though... I guess? Nah not really. It was petty and made no counter argument. Never mind.
    2
  36. Wallowing in your emotions again I see.
    2
  37. Mario Rossi Holy shit. Stop talking. You’re so embarrassingly triggered and woefully ignorant
    2
  38. bbonner422 SOUTH KOREA IS NOW SOCIALIST ACCORDING TO TIK’S BRILLIANT LOGIC
    2
  39. Normaali Ihminen lol you may not be alt right but your threatened views regarding women are fucking pathetic. Wannabchompsky has made you look a right twat.
    2
  40. Pritam Sarkar sorta like Nazi Germany. Privatised industry with limited government regulation and control.
    2
  41. Pritam Sarkar At no point was private ownership of German industry threatened in any way by the German state, so the comparison stands.
    2
  42. wannabchomsky academia knows too, not just us. We are in a YouTube comments section, not in a university lecture hall.
    2
  43. What fucking difference does it make whether Marx liked jews or not? What does that have to do with Nazism and Socialism? Absolutely fucking nothing...
    2
  44. Passion should be separate from historical analysis, but then again TIK is a shock jock, not a historian. No one even knows what his qualifications are because he refuses to tell anyone.
    2
  45. Kondwani Mututa yes you fucking do!
    2
  46. TIK indeed, like you are now, the Nazis also tried to shift the definition of socialism so as to use it to attain a base (in your case, distance yourself from a shared right wing ideology). Mustn’t let history repeat itself though right!
    2
  47. Irish Technical Thinker why does he need to stay strong? If he is right, he will be acknowledged. But unfortunately he is wrong, so he is ignored by academia.
    1
  48. He has provided you an argument that did not preciously exist, but one that you “wanted someone to make”. If this doesn’t say it all, I don’t know what does.
    1
  49. Hunter Wagner can’t even describe your own ideology? Sorta like this 5 hour rambling video.
    1
  50. Jason Buford and your lack of good education is clear. We know the American public health system is terrible, but that doesn’t apply to the rest of the world - sorry.
    1