Comments by "On The Piss" (@On_The_Piss) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. 5 hours wow that’s true obfuscation.
    1
  2. I stopped reading at " Its due to productivity due to free market policies that scandinavians have hight salaries, not by labours unions decree". @oriprogamer1404 
    1
  3.  @afonsodealbuquerque1879  … I never suggested they don’t. Like regulation, unions are essential to keep the “free market” in check. The “free market” works against these checks, not for.
    1
  4.  @oriprogamer1404  It’s funny how almost nothing of what you said actually happens in reality. In reality wages are screwed down, year by year, never increasing with inflation - meanwhile, the profits soar. So there’s the ideology, and the reality.
    1
  5.  @oriprogamer1404  What a hilariously simplistic, smooth brained take. Such a randian hero you are.
    1
  6.  @oriprogamer1404  Nah I’m just not a simp to the “free market” like you are. Also, you’re a gamer, you’re probably about 17 years old and I really don’t need to explain anything to you because history has spoken for itself time and time again - as it will in Argentina. That guy is already bowing down to China, begging them for trade - despite claiming “he would never work with communists” before he was elected. Give me a break with that libertarian nonsense. 🙄
    1
  7. You're laughing because you've got nothing to say. Go play a video game bro! @oriprogamer1404 
    1
  8.  @afonsodealbuquerque1879  “regulations are violence” is one of the funniest statements I’ve ever heard. You libertarians really do live in a fantasy world, don’t you.
    1
  9. TIK LOL what a coward
    1
  10. Kameraden including Bernie sanders, Star Trek and the Nazi party in the same rambling argument. LOL WHUT? #StickToCosplay
    1
  11. Has a literal fascist as his pic ✔️ Is a fan of TIK ✔️ Genuinely believes Nazi fascists were actually leftist socialists ✔️ You tick all the dumbdumb boxes.
    1
  12. His “argument” that Nazi Germany was economically socialist is flawed at the roots, considering the word “privatisation” was quite literally coined to describe Nazi German economic policy of the 1930’s: “The term reprivatization, again translated directly from German (Reprivatisierung), was used frequently in the mid-1930s as The Economist reported on Nazi Germany's sale of nationalized banks back to public shareholders following the 1931 economic crisis.” Because there’s nothing more “socialist” than privatising national industries. /s TIK attempts to brush over this by using the “not real capitalism” argument, which is as disingenuous as the “not real communism” argument. 🙄🙄🙄
    1
  13. TIK Hitler or the German state? Who gives a shit what Hitler was or wasn’t, what matters is whether the German state was capitalist, and it most certainly was.
    1
  14. Blah b just like you lot calling anything you don’t like socialism. You literally just did it. That’s literally what this video is. The Nazis are leftists now? You really believe that?
    1
  15. You claim to be an “ancap”. Capitalism is inherently hierarchical. So please tell us more about your confusion.
    1
  16.  @coonhound_pharoah  “there’s no such thing as collective will” - yet in your world, collectively decided laws are still to be enforced by police? What? Why? Rather, in practical reality - beyond your ideology, the “free individual” does not exist, and it never has. Individuals have always been, and still are bound by laws, regulations, decided by a collective of some form or another. What use is there for a police force if not to enforce laws decided by a collective? So, your argument that collective ownership is “hierarchical”, is a nonsense - since no individual is truly free in any practical reality, anywhere on earth. We are all bound by laws, relationships with our neighbours, etc. Are you suggesting every individual has their own set of laws, and their own private police force to enforce them? Make it make practical sense. Because I’m struggling here. Edit: whoops, I deleted my post to repost it with corrected spelling mistakes etc. Apologies.
    1
  17.  @coonhound_pharoah  We are primates are we not? Do primates exist in nature as a series of free thinking individuals, or as a collective family group? No, I’m quite sure it is your fantastical ideology is the religion here. Nature vs Nurture, literally.
    1
  18.  @coonhound_pharoah  Society? What do you, as an individual, care about society? This is total hypocrisy. Society when it suits you, radical individualism when it doesn’t.
    1
  19. Fair enough. I guess it's your idea of "the state" that terrifies me. "Anarcho-capitalists want to "abolish the state to their own satisfaction by calling it something else". They do not denounce what the state does, they just "object to who's doing it".  @coonhound_pharoah 
    1
  20. dawfydd you’re a dumbass and you lost this debate TBH. He presented arguments, you presented threatened insults. Also you’re clearly illiterate, and can’t even differentiate your from you’re. Stop embarrassing yourself.
    1
  21. TIK who gives a shit what Hitler thought he was or wasn’t? That is totally irrelevant. The North Koreans believe they are democratic and also include “democratic” in their title. Yet they are not democratic, just like Nazism was not socialist in practise, despite the title.
    1
  22. Akiva Abraham he uses other YouTube shock jocks as “sources” including Sargon. Don’t let his obfuscation and phoney resources fool you.
    1
  23. Jason Buford I’ll just leave that response to fester like the dogshit you are.
    1
  24. ed van eckert lol WTF is “racist socialism”. And you guys claim it’s the left who make up nonsense definitions. Selective socialism ISN’T SOCIALISM. That’s the whole point of socialism, it’s for everyone - or it isn’t socialism.
    1
  25. chissstardestroyer so why then did Einstein write a book promoting socialism called “why socialism” in 1949? “I am convinced there is only one way to eliminate these grave evils, namely through the establishment of a socialist economy, accompanied by an educational system which would be oriented toward social goals.” - Einstein
    1
  26.  @TheImperatorKnight  imagine politicising history
    1
  27. eric tull why bother debating with someone that consistently shifts the goal posts to suit him?
    1
  28. TIK is that why you deleted all my comments? That’s pretty weak. You claim you don’t do that in your bio, I guess you lied.
    1
  29. hmmbeef you’re a moron. WTF does the American democrat party and Jim crow laws have to do with a discussion about socialism and national socialism?
    1
  30. SpyMonkey3D I’ve presented many arguments in other comment streams here. TIK ignores them every single time and hides behind his obfuscated 5 hour video as if it has all the answers when it clearly doesn’t. Look at his up to downvote ratio. His ideas are questionable at best, outright rejected at worst.
    1
  31. Mecha9 this is the best comment here. It should be pinned. At the very least let’s hear TIK address it. (He won’t)
    1
  32. Shadowfanification No one understands the Nazis ideology, that’s the point. It makes no sense. It’s nonsense. You’re equating Hitler’s Nazi state with “the German people”, while ignoring whole swathes of it, just like the Hitler did. Just because Hitler didn’t consider these people to be German doesn’t mean they’re not German. You’re suggesting Nazi ideology was “socialist”, but only for aryans. This goes against even your own definition of socialism, yet you still ignore this glaring hole in the argument. You, nor the Nazis, get to decide what “community” is or isn’t. Regardless, German industry was not owned and operated by “the community” at all, it was privatised. It was in the hands of a tiny subset of capitalists and politicians. This is so far away from what socialism is that it’s not even funny, your definition or the accepted definition. I think the fact you’ve failed to address any of this is interesting. Ps. It’s r/askhistorians, not r/historians - one is considerably more reputable than the other.
    1
  33. White343 what you described was nonsense then, and it’s nonsense now. Socialism is for all, not a certain race.
    1
  34. Obfuscation, nothing more.
    1
  35. alex apperley then you’re not a centrist, you just think you are. “Radical centrism” or something
    1
  36. Hermit Oldguy it is indeed fascinating that qualified historians are able to make arguments in well under 5 hours, all the while avoiding political slant. TIK struggles with this concept and it shows.
    1
  37. Eric Van De Hey so basically, yes, he’s scared
    1
  38.  @SepticFuddy  say it with me: “p r i v a t i s a t i o n” One word. Go ahead and look up the etymology of that word and get back to me.
    1
  39. I don't care what this revisionist channel claims, nor you. Privatisation was coined to describe Nazi German economic policy of the 1920's. I never claimed the Nazis themselves called it that. They privatised state industries. That is quite literally the polar opposite of a socialism, by definition. The political intentions of Tik (and you) by obfuscating and twisting things is obvious, but no serious historian accepts this nonsense. That's why real historians write books, and TIK makes YouTube videos. @SepticFuddy 
    1
  40. Pedro Duarte ah so the US is socialist then?
    1
  41. @TIK how about you pin THIS post instead? And maybe try address it for once. Coward
    1
  42. D Curmudgeon lol another university drop out pretending he’s smarter than mainstream academia and university professors who have spent their lives studying these things. Apparently they are wrong, and a clickbait YouTube “historian” using other YouTube historians as sources is right. Got it.
    1
  43. Pedro Catarino LoL “not ready to hear it”, hear what? History revisionism that is not supported by academic consensus? Yeah we’re not ready to hear that thanks.
    1
  44. TIK why didn’t you release the written form first? Cos you can’t clickbait a PDF... and a PDF won’t make you YouTube money $$$. Even the picture you chose is so clickbait that it’s almost funny. Almost.
    1
  45. brad k You have no argument. You’ve said nothing. Just another blind TIK fan following his every word like gospel and without actually fact checking it for themselves.
    1
  46. Fuck me you’re pathetic. Stick to history and stop getting petty and emotional. Jesus Christ
    1
  47. TIK just like its becoming clearer and clearer that you have no interest in debate, just clickbait $$$. Keep making that fake news money $$$$$$$$$
    1
  48. Sucks for you
    1
  49. me hee where does it say that in the definition? (It doesn’t). And you idiots say it’s us who are making up definitions....
    1
  50. Double Chin Airsoft if you want to fail. No recognised academics accept this view.
    1