Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Should we create some safe space for Ukrie fans?
    17
  2. France already gve Greenland nuclear guarantees, so yanks can forget about it, unless they want to burn.
    16
  3. The main selling point of the Armata was, that that they will use its chassis up to basically everything from self propelled howitzers to IFVs to toop transports, so its kindof a real technical challenge however if they get it right that would mean a significant cost reduction for the whole project. Russians kindof always go for these interoperable systems, and where they achieve it like with the Kalibr, they can massproduce it dirt cheap. It was never about "the tank" itself.
    13
  4.  @eslSlightz  Unless they deliver thousands of pilots with them they would be just sitting on the ground.
    13
  5.  @Mixan761  No, actually NATO spent twice the annual military budget of Russia on Ukraine.
    12
  6. T90 is actually a generation younger than the Abrams, so they never really needed the T14, they already have the newest tank in the shelf.
    12
  7. The one which is closer to home shores, otherwise the whole ASW power of the adversary will hunt for my sub. For a sonar buoy its almost the same if you have a Virginia or a Type 90, it will find your sub.
    9
  8. It turns out, that while NATO played Call of Duty, Russian military played Chess. And they are pretty close to a checkmate.
    9
  9. So basically you say that they should quit while they can.
    9
  10.  @PeteHagen-sm4tn  You still dont undertand the word independent. BTW even if Greenlanders chose to separate from Denmark they can be part of the European Union which gives them the same security guarantees they have now.
    8
  11.  @N911GT2  Are nazis in USA EU or UK marching around in the countryside kidnapping people, without government retributions?
    8
  12. Did ya hear that the same place, where Russians got their chips from washing machines, or occupied Bakhmut with shovels?
    8
  13. It was a good idea to give them your manufacturing base isnt it?
    7
  14. Well, Ukraine in NATO was always an American pet project. European leaders told that its a bad idea from the beginning... If they would be more independent this war wouldnt even happen.
    6
  15. Lol there is no state in the world, which is called Gaza, thatwhy it cant have any kind of government, which is voted for.
    6
  16. Well, strangely if you read Egyptian and Babylonian records, you wont find anything about Israel, but you will find the region what you talk about called as Palestine. I know its hard for our jewish friends, that when they wrote their paleolithic fairitales, their neighbors already made a yearly diplomatic annals about their exchanges with their neighbors.
    6
  17. 3 batteries. 100 km coverage for a 1000 km long frontline. Russian jets will operate pretty much freely.
    6
  18. Im still not sure if this is a pure Netanyahu action in tandem with Hamas to pull his neck out of the ropes for his corruption scandal, a CIA plan to have an exit strategy from the failed Ukraine situation or both.
    6
  19. And where do you get your 6000 pilots from?
    6
  20. So the Us wants to ask DJI to produce drones against China. Which is by the way a chinese company...
    6
  21. Cute that you think Russian military intel gots its info from the New York Times...
    6
  22. You still buy this sht. after the 7000th precision missile was shot?
    6
  23. Thats the size of a missile which is able to cover 100 km. Thatswhy NATO SAMs are crap.
    5
  24. They taken down the drone, because they are capable to take it down, and they will take down US spyplanes if they fly that close, thats the message. End of story.
    5
  25. Lets make that calculation dear binkov. Ukrainian objectives are: 1. cutting the Russian landbridge into half in Zaporozhia 2. Occupy South Kherson 3. Liberate Crimea 4. Storm the Donbas. If they need 2 years at least for the first objective, that would give this war a 8 years lifespan, and that is actually an optimistic estimate. Now I would tell you there is no western government who would support a decade long fight in this level.
    5
  26. I see the new shift from SBU has arrived...
    5
  27. Well, his take is quite unrealistic, and people simply had enough of this war to close it down rather than daydreaming about it I think.
    5
  28. From worst to best. T90 is basically a combination of the best parts of a T-72 (very good and robust, yet easy to service and cheap suspension, hull, engine and transmission) and the best parts of the T80 (Turret, fire control, and sights) It still suffers the same faults in the vulnerability of ammo in the auto-loader. The 125mm on it is the Same as the T-80 and proven insufficient to penetrate most western MBTs frontally even at 500 meters with tungsten ammo. The British bought some in 1992 through a third party and thoroughly tested them, then they passed some on to the Americans which we tested “Extensively” and then we passed the ones we didn’t ruin to the Germans who shortly there after began an upgrade program to their Leopards. I had the good fortune of taking part in that last round of tests. The gun launched ATGM is a band aid to help engage targets at over 3000 meters as the main gun elevation isn’t sufficient to shoot HEAT rounds past that range. In every other respect, they are inferior to a HEAT round, with the added drawback that the tank must remain stationary and exposed during the whole long flight time of the missle at that range. Later on in 2000, we did get to buy a fresh T-90 (Called a T-72BU back then) from defecting troops in Chechnya, The reactive armor was good, stopping TOW and Dragon missles. The rest was minor improvements over the T-80. At only 48 tons it is the lightest of the bunch but simple physics tells you that there just isn’t enough mass of armor there to stop a modern APFSDS round, Composite armor, while somewhat lighter than the equivalent thickness of RHA, is still very heavy, the primary benefit being that you don’t need to have a meter thick front turret to have well over a meter thickness RHAe. Were it 1.5 times as effective as The DU armor on an M1 (And it is most definitely not) The T-90 just cannot cary enough at that weight to be as well protected. The Leopard 2A4 Proved vulnerable to the T-80s gun hence the Rapid Modernization of most European Leo 2’s to 2A5 and Later 2A6 standard in the mid- late 90s and the willingness of the Germans to fire sale 2A4s to anyone with the cash. The Germans refuse to use DU ammo and found out their tungsten ammo had difficulties with the T-80 front turret at 1500m+, leading them to add barrel length to the gun (55 vs 44 lengths) to combat this. The additional Applique armor on the 2A5 proved capable of holding up to the 3BM48 depleted Uranium 125mm APFSDS. So of course the Ex-American Tanker picks the M1 right, If you are going to accuse me of jingoism, you may want to stop reading now. Well I actually was there and got to watch as a 3BM48 failed to penetrate both a Challenger 2 and an M1A1 at 1000m then again at 500m frontally. It was able to penetrate both tanks from side shots at 1000m which was concerning. Kontakt 5 reactive armor did prove to be able to disrupt an M829A2 sabot round 1 out of 3 times to the point that full penetration of the front turret was not possible, leading to the development of the M829A3 round which was designed specifically to defeat this type of armor. Mobility goes to the M1 as well, it’s governed speed is the lowest of the 3, but that is really to protect the tracks, top road speed is a useless figure in combat Acceleration is the key, getting you from one spot of cover to the next. The only tank I have ever seen out accelerate an M1 is a T80- That’s it. It will out accelerate the Leo 2 and the heavier 2A5 or 2A6 regularly as well as the T90, though admittedly the T-90 scoots very well, out-running the Leo 2A5. The M256 L/44 120mm did fine with old M829A2 APFSDS penetrating nearly 70% of the time at 2500 meters with ERA, and 100% without at 3000 meters. Sadly, we were not allowed to test M1 vs Leo vs Challenger 2, and to be honest I would not want to get hit by a HESH round from a Chally-period.
    5
  29. Rockets will fall to Kiev this christmas, and next chrismas, and the chrismas after, and the christmas 10 years from now, it will continue as long as there is a glimpse of chance that Ukraine will join NATO. There wont be electricity, food, heating, your soldiers wont get any money, they will just die on the fronts. NATO has moved on years ago, sometimes they send a van with food, or a dozen of rockets as charity. Joe Biden makes sad faces in his presidential library as an ex president, for the lost Ukrainian generation, while his successor will have a dont talk about Ukraine directive, or a dont sink money into that pit directive. Zelensky will live on his Florida apartment, as an observant who forgot even that Ukraine exists. Anti immigrant feeling will get stronger in Europe, they slowly start to deport back Ukrainian refugees. Corruption will run rampant, money will worth nothing. Thats the future of the winners.
    4
  30. Lol the US can do exactly nothing more, that it already do, and Russians know that. They won't go for a nuke war for Crimea, and they were warned not to fly there.
    4
  31. The only fact is if you want draw the end result in the middle of a match that means you desperately want to quit dear.
    4
  32. Then why they are calling themselves Russians instead of the Ukrainians calling themselves Russians?
    4
  33.  @alukard6336  Because you are f.cking with the whole world economy for a bunch of corrupt nazis in the middle of nowhere?
    4
  34. As far as I remeber the downing of the Nighthawk happened in the Kosovo conflict, while Srebrenica and vukovar happened a decade earlier in the Balkans war. So in any case this bombing was more or less unjustified, and violates international law as much as Russian occupation of Crimea.
    4
  35.  @akse  Ukraine need to protect the whole Ukraine. If they dont do it, then Russians will fly in deep and bomb their supply lines, which is actually worse than what they can do on the frontlines.
    4
  36. If I would fly drones in 1000 mile distances I would simply use a submarine as the control hub, instead of building huge motherplanes.
    4
  37. I think its time to make a video about the world famous Russian shovel strikes!
    4
  38. Lol yeah mercenaries. Well sorry to inform you, but none of the rules of war applies to mercenaries, so anyone caught without an AFU or NATO badge is royally screwed. And since these guys are not idiots, they would ask a royal sum for their services. Mercenaries are good as special or auxiliary troops, not as the bulk force of an army.
    4
  39. The leaks are for you, dear, military professionals know this for months...
    4
  40. Combined arms doctrine means you have jets on the sky dear. Please stop this dumbass idiotism. At least not comment such BS in a military channel.
    4
  41. Those are excellent targets for anti radiation missiles.
    4
  42. Lol I like your animation where those Amrican warplanes just appear literally out of the blue above the Middle Eastern skies. Of course the inconveninet truth is, that without the carrier fleet camping in the Mediterranean those planes wouldnt show up. And the Mediterranean is literally in the other side of the globe to taiwan.
    4
  43.  @sharkfinbite  Even the Israelis sunk US ships who did that.
    4
  44. Lol Ukraine has the same shitty tanks. Now we will see how much firecrackers western catsies are.
    4
  45. Well, for a strange reason western powers still didnt give downtown London or New York to form the jewish state but arabic lands, which is kindof strange thinking.
    3
  46. Russia have the air defence what ukraine lost...
    3
  47.  @TKUA11  You mean when the Ukrie saints shelled Donbas for 8 years?
    3
  48. Why should they learn anything? Germany is a pro russian state Im quite sure they know everything.
    3
  49. Never count on the mistakes of your enemy...
    3
  50. No dear, you are objectively wrong again. Russians dont fly sorties deep into Ukrainian territory, because their SAMs cant tell which plane is Russian and which plane is Ukrainian. Most of those Russian planes shot down in the early phase of the war were actually friendly fire. I would tell, thats even more embarassing from a certain viewpoint. The tactical situation now is quite easy for them. Anything what flies deep inside Ukraine is Ukrainian. If Ukrainian SAMs would be such a problem, they wouldnt use their FABs all over the frontline, they are literally doing flyovers with their Su25s above poor Ukie soldiers.
    3