Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1. Well, the US can get away with money creation, because Saudis, Europeans, Japanese, Koreans, and even the Chinese are all financing it. Thats not a normal economic process forever, it is the case since the Bretton woods system was replaced in the 70s with petrodollar. From that on US puts its deficit on foreign nations, who are paying the debt for having a stable world system. The problem is the US thinks it can go to isolationism. Well, it can, but then foreign investment would dry up, everyone would only accept a money backed by raw materials or manufactured products and not dollars.  @Rägarded 
    2
  2. Lol why do you put a missile into a high mobility launcher if the launher will be stationed on a 300 m wide reef, where it cant even turn around? Corruption?
    2
  3. FABs didnt even mentioned in this, to which Ukraine absolutley have no response to...
    2
  4. Excellent delivery system for a nukie. No ABM will catch it.
    2
  5. Lol we have these sea drones for quite some time although these were called torpedoes previously.
    2
  6. If that would be the case we would see it in Ukraine dont you think... @davout5775 
    2
  7. Shall I ask why do you think that Rusians wouldn't use their navy in such a situation, and let Ukrainian imaginary fighterjets to cross the Black sea, and wouldn't use their firepower to suppress advancing Ukrainian troops from the sea? Also you make an argument, that a 1000 strong Russian airforce can't break through ukrainian AD, and after that you argue, that with 300 F-16's ukrainians could break through Russian AD, we see how nonsensical that is. BTW using ORYX data is kindof unprofessional, those numbers are highly questionable, rather considered as war propaganda. We have more reliable sources regarding to this, such as the MOSSAD, which reports are actually somewhat supported by other casualty calculations.
    2
  8.  @THEROOT1111  Well thats optimistic because Germans were able to actually hold most of Crimea in WWII up to 1945 with way less connection to the bulk of the German army then wht the Russians have to mainland Russia. And of course more terriotries Ukraine take, more concentrated Russian forces become. I dont think Russia actually intend to make a serious landgrab besides what they already took. It is a pretty well defendable line.
    2
  9.  @CountryLifestyle2023  They key word what you mentioned is were. What they occupied in this tranche strategically makes a lot of sense. It makes Crimea connected to the Russian mainland, which was their problem since 2014, and occupied the highground from where Ukraine shelled Donbas for years. Maybe in the future they plan another invasion, but for now they would be pretty much content with these results.
    2
  10.  @ElementalWarrior1999  Because most of these systems were never intended to be massproduced, they are literally hand crafted by very high skill workforce in almost in the prototype stage.
    2
  11. Well, no, its stated that they are better than the Los Angeles class. They are on par with the Seawolf approximately.
    2
  12. Dont fly 10 miles off another country's shoreline with malign intent, and you won't be fired at.
    2
  13.  @keitht24  Well the moment you started to fck with the Russians, all of what you say went to null. China can get what it wants through them, oil, gas, food, you name it. End of story. A startegically debilitated story. You lost this the moment you made them allies.
    2
  14.  @OhNotThat  Yeah you should give Ukraine money catapults instead, because you have the money, but you cant produce the weapons. Literally, you have to wait 9 years for a NASAMS.
    2
  15.  @OhNotThat  Lol no it wont I guarantee that. Just listen to Macron, he pretty much had enough, and he is not alone. This war will be over this year one way or another, everyone knows it, even Zelensky knows it.
    2
  16.  @aguynamedscott11  Better push for it, because otherwise it will be just told them to accept anything that Russia wants. They are not in a position to say no to any of their backers, they wouldnt survive a day without constant bailouts and weapons shipments.
    2
  17. Why do you think they make their cruise missile strikes? All missile or drone downed by an S-300 is one less S-300 used against them. They are using gliding bombs near the frontlines now and gravity bomb attacks such depleted are the ukrainian air defenses. Sooner than later they will achieve air superiority, if the west doesnt find out how to send them AA in meaningful quantities.
    2
  18. Well, if they save their ammo, that means, they let through Russian aviation to do whatever they want to do...
    2
  19. Well Ukraine is not part of the European Union while Denmark is, so your point is pretty much moot.
    2
  20. I doubt Americans can defend it. Canada or Iceland wont give you logistical support for such a takeover, which means your closest base is as far as China's closest base.
    2
  21.  @BroadHobbyProjects  True, Germans firesaled all of their A4's when they tested them with a Chechen captured T90. It was faster, lighter, better armored, and shoot straight through the frontal quadrant of the Leo from 1500 m.
    2
  22. Based on what? Your imagination?
    2
  23. Yeah, you know ehn Russians did half of what you wrote, your european and american friends couldnt cry more about war crimes and the Hague, and they are not that idiot to get 6 billion angry people to whitewash such a double standard because they dont have the military might to stop them.
    2
  24. Lol they are just beating the cr.p out of NATO. Noone will respect the west when they finish.
    2
  25.  @bigpoop112  Outaccelerate not outmaneuver.
    2
  26. The New Atlas with Brian Berletic, Willy OAM, HistoryLegends, Col Douglas McGregor.
    2
  27. I dont think its wise to remind Ukraine's biggest weapon supplier, about what some drunken slavs did to them 70 years ago... @ldkbudda4176 
    2
  28. So what? You shoot your torps, everybody knows you are there, and your awesome US sub is simply hunted down by a swarming ASW force. So to be safe the awesome US sub can awesomely sit in the water doing nothing.
    2
  29. So you want NATO in. Nothing else can stop the Russians. It was a pipedream from the start that Ukraine is enough. They have no time to learn to use F-35's, or F16's in quantity enough to break Russian air defense.
    2
  30. Facts are facts buddy... @grafvonscyth2928 
    2
  31. I translate it to you: in 1945 USA already sold out Ukraine to the Soviet Union, and they were idiots not to arm themselves with nukes instead of waiting for daddy NATO to rescue them. On one hand he is maybe right, on the other hand neither the US nor Russia would let them to have Euromaidan festivals, if they were a nuclear nation back then, because thats kindof risky if far right idiots get their hands on weapons of mass destruction.  @davidporter7051 
    2
  32. You start to realize that war is a racket? Well it is.
    2
  33. If they would be then there wouldnt be a need for the Balfour declaration. But I still dont get it, how can you give something, what does not belongs to you. @Darkseidsolosfiction 
    1
  34. Does that mean, they can form a Palestine state there?  @OldManRocketLeague 
    1
  35. Well, no, since jewish is an ethnicity while Islam is a religion. But even if we take that to face value more than half of the jewish population is actually khazar in origin, which was a kingdom in modern day Ukraine what for some strange reason adopted jewish customs in the late medieval period of 800-900 AD.  @OldManRocketLeague 
    1
  36. Well I read the seven pillars of wisdom from T.E. Lawrence, who was the liaison officer to the Arab insurgents against the Ottoman empire, but I didnt read any jewish assistance there. @OldManRocketLeague 
    1
  37.  @LewLewVuitton  Yeah they will definitely hand it to the Ukries. If they wanna spare it for the Taiwan conflict it would better placed in South Korea.
    1
  38.  @tomwhittaker9461  3 months with their actual consumption. That can be a big relief.
    1
  39.  @IONindustries627  Its not likely that even if they win anyone would see their money back.
    1
  40. Well, if we are talking about what armor could be possibly used, Ukraine's breach near Robotine looks like an excellent cauldron, which screams for a pincer movement from Russians from the east and west to cut them off.
    1
  41. ​ @ApolloGGG  Well, yeah you solved a few strategic problems of China recently.
    1
  42.  @klowen7778  You know the main part of fighting a successful war is deception. Kyiv was doomed its operational success the moment they are disputing the direction of their main thrust. Putin only needs to put his forces there. Problem solved.
    1
  43. Thats the Belgorod...
    1
  44. Wouldnt a simple smokescreen blown by the first tank more I dont know prudent solution?
    1
  45. The US leaked it, so CNN and other MSM outlets at least save some face if Ukraine will be defeated, that they werent entirely untrustworthy.
    1
  46.  @kyb5203  As long as noone can rotate a laser turret in mach 6, its pretty much pointless excersise. The solution will be a highly maneuverable AG missile.
    1
  47. Yeah, Binkov, its a pretty old stuff between military analysts, to speculate on when Ukraine runs out of SAM's.
    1
  48. You cant start a war after thisone. NATO has to replenish its stockpiles, rebuild its economies etc.
    1
  49.  @alexd832  Russian minority problem has to be solved in Ukraine anyway. And in the Baltics as well. Too long Europe tried to pretend that its not their problem.
    1
  50.  @pepe-zw4de  Well one thing is for sure, it will be less likely Greenalnders will let Americans build bases in Greenland, because those are security risks now.
    1