Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Thunderf00t"
channel.
-
10
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Some of the people objectively dont understand why Elon Musk and his company actually harmed the combat against climate change. So lets start with the obvious, 60% of all CO2 emissions are coming from public heating. To combat climate change passive houses, net zero heating systems, and better insulation are the absolutely the 0th step. Meanwhile Musk derailed the whole topic towards road transport, which contributes to less than 10% of the overall GHG emissions. Today we are at a point, where governments give tens of thousands of dollars as tax incentives for very rich men to buy electric cars and show off, while they threaten ordinary folks that they will ban their gas heating, who in turn become climate sceptics, because they dont intend to freeze during the winter. This whole topic became a secondary agenda of car manufacturing states who want to get ahead eachother, thatswhy spending billions to build EV infrastructure from taxpayer's money, meanwhile totally abandoning any house renovation projects. Considering that he actually declared war on the most environmentally friendly way of road transport, railways. His cars will never be as efficient and climate friendly as a train is, let it be a passenger train or a cargo train, yet he wanted to crack down on both with Hyperloop and Tesla Semi respectively. By diverting funds towards the EV industry, the charger points and everything which should be solved from his fortune, or from his customer's wallet, instead of government money he is actually draining resources from existing and newly built rail projects, like the San Francisco highspeed rail, but even the ordinary rail infrastructure is in shambles, there are train accidents in the US every single year like East Palestine, entire bridges collapse, there should government money go not to these phantasmagories. I absolutely appreciate early adopters, but its not the duty of the general public to foot the bill of their hobbies. His other project, SpaceX makes even less sense. If we cant solve the climate crysis on Earth how the hell will we ever colonize such a hostile planet as Mars? Nohow. Even if it would be done like ever, it would be a ticket for the superrich to get away from the problems they caused, I again dont see why the community should give funds to such enterprises, superrich are superrich, they should finance their escape plans. And whoever lets this guy to put a chip into his head is certified insane.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Proton not barely beating Falcon 9 , it has double the payload capacity, my friend, it was used to build the ISS, and made a circumlunar orbit, not some model rocket like Falcon 9, it is a heavy duty lift vehicle. Soyuz 2 also have 8500 kg payload capacity to LEO, which is technically one ton less than the Falcon 9 s 9500 kg, but for that both stages of the Falcon have to be sacrificed, so it wouldnt be an average pricetag launch, it would cost around 60-80 million, while you could get the same from the Russians for 40. @lazarus2691
2
-
2
-
2
-
2