Comments by "Gabor Rajnai" (@gaborrajnai6213) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1. I have to give credit to Trump, with the brainworm guy, the Russian amazon, the alcoholic crusader and Space Hitler he put together such a cabinet where Trump looks like the adult in the room....
    2
  2. Lol Even thats a lie by Musk, He combined all of Model Y and Model 3 sales together. Its like saying Merdedes S class is the best selling car in the world, by adding to the S class every A and C class which are sold.
    2
  3. Come on man, if SpaceX would be an order of magnitude cheaper than the industry, they would send up full loaded satellites for 5 million dollars. Even Musk does not claim that. Truth is Russians are still cheaper, but their space industry is sanctioned as well as all of their economy. Musk has a temporary advantage to call at best, to figure out how can he become cheaper than the Soyuz, because he cant rely forever on that will be the case. Thatswhy he needs Starship, because Falcon 9 wont be competitive on the long run.
    2
  4.  @thomaspeck430  Lol we have landed rockets you know in the Moon 40 years ago, so tell me when Musk is there...
    2
  5. I always wanted to ask: why do they want to put a turbine on the front of the car which travels in supposed vacuum?
    2
  6. Was Musk hiding under the grass in the abandoned hole, so TF is stalking him? For some strange miracle Linus techtips guy didnt went back to the place where he onanized 5 years ago about our bright new future to see what it became. johndoe2-ns6tf 
    2
  7.  @valis992000  Yep, we had General Dynamics building, you know, the Saturn V around 1966. Kindof an awesome rocket too, way better than anything Musk has designed up to date. Or the Atlas rocket family from Lockheed from 1960, which can do 90% of what a Falcon 9 can, and 110% of what the satellite contractors want it to used for and doesnt cost 10 billion govt money to reinvent... Actually you could run all the satellite launches in the world for free for 3 years just by giving to sat launchers the subsidies Musk received to his rocket for the government. Musktards generally speak as if no other company built a rocket before Musk ever, meanwhile there are a dozen just in the USA, who were basically sidelined by the govt for a decade so Musk could have better business opportunities. To be honest he halted human scientific progress by a decade because ISS couldnt be utilized for its full potential of a crew of 6+ because he had to figure out a capsule, which any company, who built one in the last 60 years of spaceflight could do in a matter of few years.
    1
  8. The question comes into my mind is how on Earth do these idiots have a hundred thousand grands for these cars? I mean they certainly didnt put it togther from their brainproducts.
    1
  9. You mean that Californian legal authorities actually LET those cars driverless? Do you realize that the footage where the car tried to kill the cylclist is from 2022?
    1
  10. Superconductor you wanted to say, because we have a ton of room temperature semiconductors. But you would be suprised, because its harder to debunk thatone than to debunk Musk, because in theory thats not entirely impossible, and in analytical terms to produce lk99 with the right amount of impurities is not as easy.
    1
  11. Russians had this idea to light up the arctic during the winter. It can work.
    1
  12. Cant he just get some clever people to invest that money what he steals from his followers into projects which actually makes sense? Oh sorry I forgot that outlandish claims are part of the business model.
    1
  13. Hydro and geothermal are baseload power. Hydro is actually the best, most versatile type of energy among all options nuclear added.
    1
  14. Why doesnt he sell tickets to the andromeda galaxy?
    1
  15. She didnt sold her shares, as Bankman did.
    1
  16. There were 68 incidents involved 747-s and one invoved a Concorde.
    1
  17. From all the boosters and rocket engines the only thing from the space shuttle which didnt land intactly was the main fueltank. The difference was that in the good old times they used parachutes to get those things back.
    1
  18. Yeah that was kindof demagogic from Phil to measure the radiation near the damaged block, since that part was the most extensively cleaned up. You can find spots in Chernobyl exclusion zone, or in south Belarus which are really hot even today. Even that wildlife sanctuary hypothesis is debated among researchers, there are some studies made on trees groving there which actually shows increased deformation and cancer among the plants growing in the exclusion zone compared to standard european forests.
    1
  19. Boeing execs fly things into orbit regularly, yet they are not exactly the most popular people among Musk fandom. Boeing execs are not tech Jesuses, they do what they are payed for doing their job, quite abysmally recently, everybody understands that, then why should Musk be above critique. I really dont see what Musk made what wasnt already made before him. Ok so we can send stuff up into space, not that we couldnt send stuff up into space a priori, not that there werent the SaturnV or the Energija, which could send up 100 tons into space, if it was needed, but there never was a real incentive to send up 100 tons into orbit, except some quirky government projects. Maybe it will be commercially viable, most likely it will fail as all of its predecessors failed. It wont make space business cheaper, like ever, not because his rocket concepts dont work but because capitalism doesnt work thatway, capitalism works in a way that if he can charge NASA for 80 million per seat on his capsule, he will charge NASA 80 million per seat in his capsule, he wont cut prices for the sake of cutting prices, noone would do in his place.The only thing what could cut prices would be competition, but theres no real competition in the space industry. 70% of all satellite launches is done by governments, Americans wont send up their crucial satellites on Russian rockets, Russinas wont send up their crucial satellites on American rockets, and Chinese wont send up their satellites on both, its a national security concern. Let alone I dont see why lets say his hypersonic passenger liners would actually help humanity, on rocket launch combust more GHG gases than 50 jets, its an incredibly wasteful way of transport, thatswhy nobody even tried it before Musk. Clever people first calculate, what they actually want to achieve, not going in headon, because technology which supports their wild ideas doesnt grow out of the ground, if they sketch an idea. Yeah Musk could sketch giant electric rocket engines on his rockets, and sell it as groundbreaking innovation, yet as long as giant electric rocket engines dont exist it is a mundane enterprise. He uses the Steve Jobs recipe with some more credibility, Jobs sold computers with a promise that one will save the world thatway, Musk sells EVs, they dont sell physical products but visions, and objectively their most sought after products are Tesla stocks. What Elon Musk really do, is taking well known sci fi concepts from the past, which were all tried and failed and try to push them through with brute force and advertizing, hile gathering a bunch of sci fi fans behind his projects to support him.
    1
  20. I think TF would get along well with Rogan.
    1
  21. Put an areospike in front of your highspeed rail. That alone can reduce drag by 50%.
    1
  22. Im in a little bit of AI, and what my humble knowledge says about it, definitely noone wants to develop an AI which drives a car, and capable of moving an android around. Because to drive a car, you actually dont need those functions like moving the chassis on legs, so the development and the resources would be basically wasted.
    1
  23. Why it shouldnt go supercritical? That would significantly reduce its overall volume.
    1
  24.  @obviousmaths4368  Well there is no way you could keep it under 30 C and 100 Bar unless you store it above 1000 meters. The hydrostatic pressure and geothermal gradient in the aquifer will be higher below regardless, so it will be supercritical, no matter what we do. That would be a problematic limiting factor, since most of the oil and gas wells are actually deeper than that. Letting it change phase in the aquifer would most likely result in fracking, then calculations need to be done if the barrier rock's tensile strength is enough not to crack.
    1
  25. Well, he had the audacity to get Blue origins into court, because they proposed a different lander, which in the end can be the saving grace of Artemis.
    1
  26. Teslas are banned in China to drive near government or military properties. They are afraid of NSA is using their sensors to spy on them.
    1
  27. What if he would name his new shiny rocket the ... V2
    1
  28. I would concur on the optimism about geoengineering. If it would be so easy to counter global warming by injecting stuff to the atmosphere, then it would be solved by itself, because warmer temperature means higher humidity means more clouds, means higher albedo, means lower temperature. I dont say it cant be done, but not on your scale of 8 billion tons of SO2. Truth is, we dont know exactly how much mount Pinatubo, Krakatoa, or the global dirty coal industry put into the atmosphere, we can just speculate wildly about it, but volcanoes tend to put more gases into the atmosphere by a single eruption than what humanity ever put into there.
    1
  29. Noone knows if it was inaccurate, but the reactor engineers of the time thought about it as a possibility, so its not that far fetched. Honestly Chernobyl type reactor was a half military reactor which was capable to process unenriched uranium and turn it into weapons grade plutonium, add that together with a ton of unburned graphite moderator near the lava, that it was in the end of its entire refueling cycle which means the lava contained pretty effective neutron sources to start up the chain reaction, and you can see why they were afraid.
    1
  30. Thermal expansion in railways is solved by adding centimeter gaps between each rail segment. Now if you add a centimeter gap into a vacuum tube to expand... well, you wont have vacuum anymore.
    1
  31. Well, no plants dont have the capacity to do the trick on the long run. If you look around you see mountains which contains limestone, it is pretty common, while seeing mountains out of coal is pretty extraordinary. 1% of the CO2 can be permanently captured in organic matter compared to inorganic material.
    1
  32. Cause its cool... On the other hand robotaxis would make a lot of sense if they could be made, cars arent used 90% of their life.
    1
  33. You dont spew toxic, carcinogenic asthma causing materials into the air with gas, and it could be solved with coal pretty easily. If only that would be the problem, we would have a happy fossil fuel industry.
    1
  34. Why do you think he is building a rocket to Mars? Because that will be the only place where his investors wont find him, when the whole mountain of crap he built collapses...
    1
  35. It reminds me the good old days when I won 200 bucks from a muskrat 4 years ago, who was willing to bet, that Musk will send this hunk of metal to orbit in 2020. I told him, that not even he wont send sht to orbit thatyear, but I bet on he wont even fly the booster rocket. Won both.
    1
  36. Well, Apple made it although Jobs never lost his cult.
    1
  37. Most likely that will happen unless they are outcompeted. But its a hard thing now, since their evaluation was unrealistic, they will fall under their real value when sht really hits the fan, which they might not survive.
    1
  38. Well, if you get it from the atmosphere yes. If you get it from the exhaust directly it is maybe 1 kg CO2 to 10 kg of exhaust, but there are ways to push it above 1 kg of CO2 to 4 kg of exhaust, where it can be done economically.
    1
  39. Lol never thought that German universities are THAT rubbish...
    1
  40. Lol Musk cant make a bigger rocket engine without tackling combustion instability. Even NASA couldnt solve it on an exact scientific basis rather by trial and error, thatswhy we cant build F1 engines anymore.
    1
  41. What if we would send up satellites filled with argon and neon and write a giant Coca Cola sign into the night sky?
    1
  42. Just them being horrible people in horrible companies doesnt mean, they are actually overselling their products.
    1
  43. Lol, I think Musk is actually betting right. You think that frauding more people puts him in a worse position than Bankman, while it actually puts him into a better position. He and his company is too big to fail now, the government will bail them out of anything and everything.
    1
  44. Elon open sourced grifting.
    1
  45. Well, they can afford Space Jesus's bonuses...
    1
  46. Let us assume, that the shortsellers of Tesla do actually know what they are doing, and the foreseeable correction is not the apocalypse of the western civilisation.
    1
  47. Its cute that you think TF, that politicians or buisness tycoons actually care about money. You know these people can print the stuff. Yeah, they cant give it to anyone, because then it would become worthless, but they can finance vaporware out of it.
    1
  48. Yeah we have already seen with Brexit where does it lead when these wackos running amok. They will not only wipe US wealth, but will defend them losing their jobs their money, and their livelihood day by day by telling that others are suffering more than them...
    1
  49. By soyuz I guess?
    1
  50. Well those sats over the ocean are not necesarily useless, those can reflect sunlight into the ones, which are in good position. I dont think it is such a bad idea, I would certainly pay a few bucks just to troll an entire city for an hour.
    1