Comments by "Arnold Hubbert" (@arnoldhubbert6779) on "History Tea Time with Lindsay Holiday" channel.

  1.  @royalistparty8380  Your information is incredibly false. According to the 1860 census, around 226,000 free Black people lived in the Northern states before the Civil War, and about the same number living in the South. By contrast, there were over 4 million black slaves. Also, even the free blacks were once slaves or descendants of slaves (usually no further back than their parents). There were also no white slaves. There were some indentured servants but that's a huge difference since once you paid your debt, you were no longer indentured. Slaves were born and died slaves (and their children) as a result of their race.
    1
  2. "Swarthy, Ruddy, brunette and olive" were all just European terms used to describe some white Europeans. Those words were not used to describe black negroes. If the word black was ever also used, it was in reference to hair color. This is very easily proven. That black negroes would have such a huge racial inferiority complex as to believe in the most easily refuted delusional fantasies, should be an source of extreme embarrassment to those of the black community.
    1
  3. "Dark skinned people dominated Europe since its first inhabitants so they were the majority of the population up until the 1800's." de•lu•sion•al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition or an inferiority complex.
    1
  4.  @Dingledanus  "Mudhuts are fried brick or clay brick . They are better then woodshacks" Have you ever seen pictures of European architechture, from the medieval period and even hundreds of years earlier? Europeans were living in palaces, castles, and citiies that aren't much less advanced than we have today. Where as negroes were living in mud huts (at best) until relatively recently. "Africans had iron and stone buildings before Europeans " What an absurd claim coming from the world's most primitive (and still the world's more primitive) people. You all were living in the stone age when discovered by Europeans. You all weren't even using the wheel until the 20th century. THE 20TH CENTURY!!! How pathetic is that. Also, regarding African cannibalism. Perhaps your'e just unaware of your own history. Prepare for a shock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannibalism_in_Africa Btw, most of these accounts are from sub saharan west africa (Nigeria and the congo) which are regions where most african american's ancestry comes from. These are YOUR direct ancestors. Btw, I'm fairly certain you won't reply to me after reading this because you'll be so shocked by your own heritage that you'll likely deal with it by being in denial.
    1
  5.  @benyahudadavidl  You're saying Godrey Higgins, etc. were negroes or that they wrote about negroes? I don't have time to read that book so just provide me with what you claim it says. That book references a common source for a lot of the worlds' religions but I don't see anywhere it says that Europeans were negroes.
    1
  6. The movie was highly inaccurate, though.
    1
  7.  @mikaladavis4102  I very much agree with you on that point!
    1
  8.  @mikaladavis4102  Absolutely. The producers think that's what people want to see but it's not true. It doesn't add to, like they claim, but distracts from the plot.
    1
  9. @PerryLornythorinque It's ok to learn about history in greater detail, however, it still needs to be accurate. And, people can learn about whatever history they want to on their own, but "black" history isn't been kept "hidden." The handful of individuals on this video, for the most part, aren't that remarkable. Would we even care to know about them if they were white? Likely not. Btw, even these examples are linked to slavery, one way or the other.
    1
  10. @PerryLornythorinque Your English is far better than my French (I actually do speak a little and I happen to be talking to my daughter while typing this whose actually lives in France right now and speaks fluently). I never said this video wasn't necessarily inaccurate (although, the title is a little misleading, because most of those individuals really wouldn't be considered aristocrats (even if a few of them assocaited with aristocrats). Some of them weren't remakable at all, only unique, given their enslaved background and their unique circumstances. However, I will agree that what a few of them achieved, though not necessarily historically remarkable, it was remarkable, given their backgroud, that they accomplished what they did. However, a common perspective from some segments of American society, distorts and exaggerates these examples. For example, there was a recent film made all about Dido Belle, but rather than representing the truth about her very unremarkable accomplishments or historical impact, instead made her out to be the most talented, skilled, accommplished, of supreme noble character, but oppressed, while at the same time made most of the white people out to be incompetent, naive, oppressive, bafoons. In reality, she was nothing more than a mixed race servant, but who was also cared for more so than most african slaves at the time so associated with her white cousin to a degree while they were young. Doesn't sound like a great movie but have been more historically accurate. My original point was that many black Americans are obsessed with finding validation and self-worth by associating black people with European history, especially if they're somehow able to find a connection with the nobility. Due to being surrounded by European history for generations, they've come to believe that the only way to achieve the greatest self-worth is within the context of European history and identity. However, historical accuracy isn't as important as how it makes you feel so often these connections or their accomplishments are often highly exaggerated.
    1
  11. @PerryLornythorinque In fact, it's been taken to such an extreme that it is now to the point of absurd delusional fantasy. If you read the many of the comments below, you'll notice that many black people aren't even satisfied with these handfull of individuals, but are actually making the claims that ALL the European nobility weren't white at all but were actually black and in fact, black negroes were the original European people until white people came out of their caves in the late 1700's, and then black people taught white people civilization and how to build castles, cities, and ships, etc. then the white people took over their identities (including their noble titles and moved into their castles) and shipped all the black people to Africa and America, made them slaves and made them forget who they were. Many black Americans suffer from these delusions as a result of a huge inferiority complex.
    1
  12. even though each of their actual heritage can be traced to their African origin?
    1
  13.  @nebulanesian369  I get my knowledge of history from numerous sources. Records that correlate with and support each other from numerous divergent sources (in other words, a historical account written by one group correlates with the historical record recorded by another group in another area, both act like supportive witnesses for each other and that what they've recorded is largely true), supporting scientific and anthropological and archeological evidence which also support each other as well as the historical record (for example, every dna test ever conducted of every Norse/Viking burial all show white European dna that perfectly matches that of their modern descendants in Scandinavia (and in a few cases, other Northern European people), my own family's records and documentation, which can be traced all the way back several generations in Europe and include genealogical records (going back hundreds, even well over a thousand years), journals, portraiture (I have paintings and statuary of my direct ancestors that I've seen), even oral histories that have been passed down to myself, that are more than a couple hundred years old. for starters. Btw, my own dna matches dna taken from Viking/Norse burials from over a thousand years ago. On the other hand, if you''re black, every black (american) dna test ALWAYS, shows your dna originated in west Africa, EXACTLY FROM WHERE THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS YOUR ANCESTEORS WERE ENSLAVED (even down to the very west african tribes). See, that's how an understanding of true history works, one thing corroborating another. Where do you get your "knowledge" of history, besides from your own fantasies? From a few videos on the internet made by a few Afrocentrists, who have NO connection to Europe, past or modern, and whose comprehension of European history (and terminology, including an understanding of the word "swarthy") is influenced by the world's biggest inferiority complex and resulting bias? If you were an honest searcher for true history, just go ask a European what the definition is of the word "swarthy." He'll laugh at you if you claim it means black negro.
    1
  14. Btw, I can see why so many of you delusional afrocentrists think you can just claim European heritage, just based on your original statement. You referenced "primary source material" and I'm sure you assume that white Europeans just have never read those things and that our knowledge is just limited to what we learned in elementary school. The fact that you're that delusional corroborates your absurd claims. I've personally, as have probably the majority of Europeans, read vast amounts of "primary source" material. We have entire courses of study in universities that use source material in their entirety, from every area and period of European history. Do you honestly think we're not aware of our own history? Europeans (in Europe or America), despite some exceptions, are EXTREMELY aware of our history and heritage. In many cases, we've maintained a connection to even our distant ancestors for hundreds of years. Even many of us Americans have been to the actual houses (and castles) in Europe where our families lived for hundreds of years. One house my family lived in, just before immigrating to America, our family lived in for several hundred years and is still called by my family name as their house. By contrast, you probably can't go very far back in your own genealogy (not your fault, if you're a descendant of slaves, which erased most of your heritage). And now, you've read a few things in a few books, taken way out of context, and combined with a personal bias, and now YOU have the gall to accuse Europeans for not being aware of our own history and that YOU, with absolutely NO connection, are now the expert in OUR history? You guys are truly the world's most delusional people.
    1
  15.  @nebulanesian369  I've studied extensively on my own, reputable sources from actual educated non-biased people. By contrast, you get your information from other equally delusional people suffering from the same inferiority complex you're suffering from, as well as from you own delusional fantasies.
    1
  16.  @Dingledanus  actually, I get my education from a variety of sources, including first hand and from my own family. You guys are so naive and assume that white people just get all their informaton and education from the public school system. You have no idea just how conntected we are to our own family histories, which we can trace back hundreds or even over a thousand years. We don't get it out of school books. We get it out of the actual parish records, from the towns and cities our people came from, whic records are themselves, fairly ancient. Most african americans can't trace their own ancestry beyond the1870 census, at best. (most don't even know your great grandparents).
    1
  17. Queen Charlotte's MOTHER was African? Really? Proof please? This is an example of how extreme speculation or outright falsehoods get spread. Someone like you makes an absurd claim. Other gullible people with then use your false statement as support for what they believe, and all of a sudden, we have fake history. Well done.
    1
  18. Here's what a people with the world's biggest racial inferiority complex do. 1) They first envy your heritage. 2) Then they fantasize about having your heritage with you. 3) Then, they take your heritage and deny that it's even your heritage anymore. Over the last few decades, blacks have been doing this same thing with the following peoples: Egyptians, Japanese, Chinese, British, Anglo Saxons, Celts, Vikings, Russians, all Europeans, Jews, all Israelites, native Americans. In fact, I think the only heritage they won't claim is AFRICAN.
    1
  19. Besides all the untruths you just claimed, here's one of the more obvious. "black Moors would conquer Rome and rule most of Europe for more then eight hundred years". Besides the fact that the Moors weren't actually black negro (though they likely did include some blacks in their ranks), where do you get the idea that the Moors ruled most of Europe for 800 years? They didn't ever rule most of Spain for 800 years. The fact that you would distort a very easily proven history, is an example of the extremes you'll go to to make other false claims.
    1
  20. "Caucasians are the newest race on this planet" So, you're saying the Caucasians are the most evolved of all the races? Don't you all also claim that the black race was the original race? Does that mean the black race is the least evolved? You do realize that this is exactly what white supremacists claims, right?
    1
  21. You are truly delusional. Black negro history in Europe hasn't been hidden. There's nothing there to hide. The fact that you actually are so delusional to believe that "Oliver Cromwell in the mid 1600s murdered and deported thousands and possibly millions of Euro blacks most of whom were absorbed into the fabric of the New World alongside West African slaves" shows how truly separated from reality you are. Your negro ancestors WERE ALL FROM AFRICA. If you've taken a dna test, your negro dna will exactly match those regions from where negroes were enslaved and brought to the Americas. IF you have any European dna, it's only because you have mixed ancestry. IF you have dna that matches anything in Europe, it's from any white European ancestry you may have. IT'S NOT from your negro dna.
    1
  22. The oft cited Ben Frankly quote is a perfect example of just how delusional you are and how much you misinterpret the meanings of words. He used tawny to describe some Europeans in mid 1700's. Tawny doesn't mean black negro. If it did, I, who am of Scandinavian and German heritage, and who lived in those regions during that period, would show negro dna. I do not. Not a drop. Which means, his use of the word tawny DOES NOT mean black negro, but simply just another shade of white European.
    1
  23. It's actually quite pathetic that so many negroes think they need to claim European heritage in order to have any pride whatsoever in their heritage. Instead of wasting so much time studying (and then fantasizing) about heritage that isn't yours (European), why don't you put more effort into your own black negro african heritage. You'll get a lot more self worth out of the truth.
    1
  24. CB ENT Arnold Hubbert and I said the fact the Noble houses were Swarthy and melinatted is what made them Moors ...you can't get around Europes Dark nobility
    1
  25.  @yvngleanoa2137  Where in the world are you getting the idea they spread out to France and other kingdoms? They never went beyond Spain, though they tried, but were defeated before their attempt to enter France. They didn't even rule over all of Spain, and most of their rule was over a minority of Spain. Also, where did you get the number 900 years? It was 781 years. Also, "melanated" is a virtually useless word, because it's so subjective. It could literally mean anyone with a complexion darker than the palest of Nordic Europeans, which includes a lot of Caucasian people, including southern Europeans. Moors were, according to every historian, north African berber and arabic and weren't negro. Also, here's the official definition of of the word, Moor: Moor (n.) "North African, Berber, one of the race dwelling in Barbary," from Old French More, from Medieval Latin Morus, from Latin Maurus "inhabitant of Mauretania" (Roman northwest Africa, a region now corresponding to northern Algeria and Morocco)." Pick up book, bro.
    1
  26.  @yvngleanoa2137  Are you serious? The Huguenots weren't negroes. Where in the world are you getting that absurd idea? Have you been watching black supremacist videos again? The Huguenots were a group of French Protestants who fled France and Wallonia (southern Belgium) in the 16th–18th centuries due to religious persecution: Who were they? They were primarily middle class and skilled artisans who followed the teachings of theologian John Calvin. They mostly settled in other parts of Europe and their descendants are well known. They're all Caucasian Europeans. None of them have even a drop of negro dna. And, before you get any other absurd ideas, NO MODERN (OR ANCIENT) EUROPEANS HAVE ANY NEGRO DNA.
    1
  27.  @yvngleanoa2137  de·lu·sion·al /dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition.
    1
  28.  @kefabenysraal7687  Exactly. Blacks were the original Europeans who invented and built everything Europeans are given the credit for. They were the original nobility until white Europeans came and kicked them out of their castles and stole their identities and noble heritage and noble heraldry and coats of arms. UNTIL whites got enough power and then secretly, leaving absolutely no evidence, killed or captured ALL blacks and secretly shipped them to the Americas, but destroying all the records and forcing all the people in Europe and America at the time to both deny it ever happened and to never write about it or pass down oral stories to their descendants, including as especially the blacks themselves. Then, the whites destroyed or altered all the images and records of native black europeans, except of course, any records or images of blacks who were slaves transported from slave territories. And, if that weren't enough, they even dug up ALL the black graves in Europe and destroyed all the evidence (or just transposted all the graves to the Americas) so that one day, no future scientist would be able to use DNA testing to prove they existed. Clever devils, those white people. And, super hard working. That would have taken generations of hard work to do all that.
    1
  29.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  He didn't say black. He say "swarthy." White italians, French, and even some British are considered swarthy. You guys really are delusional.
    1
  30.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  Are you really so delusional that you would believe something so easily disproven, that all continental Europeans were black negroes as recent as the mid 1700's? And then what happened? A whole bunch of white people came in and killed or captured all the blacks and completely erased any proof of their existence, including digging up all their graves and destroying any dna evidence.
    1
  31.  @kefabenysraal7687  So, how were they able to do it all? Did they really dig up ALL the black graves in Europe?
    1
  32.  @heyalfietheconnoisseur  Don't you know the different between what a European means by "black or tawny" versus "swarthy?" Swarthy just means either less than very fair, or olive toned skin. It can also just mean dark hair and eyes. Southern Europeans and even some living in northern countries, are considerd swarthy by Europeans, both today, and back in the 1700's. Do you honestly think that all the Germans and Swedes were black negroes as recent as the mid 1700's? What happend to them all?
    1
  33.  @eddedcuba3408  In your video 23:20, This is a perfect example of how black afrocentrists have it ALL WRONG. "...a tall, thin, black man, like a spaniard or Jew." The accompianing portrait is not fake. It shows at tall, thin, "black man" according to how Eurpeans refer to other Europeans with dark or black hair. Spaniards and Jews were known (and still so) to be darker than most Europeans, especially having dark or black hair. Afrocentrists are so delulsional that you naiviely think than all references to "black" in old European records refer to negroes. Black Irish weren't negro Irish. They were irish with black hair.
    1
  34. So, you conclude that because there were literally a handful of black and mixed black/white individuals who achieved minor prominence in Europe (extremely minor. At least a couple mentioned were still technically slaves), that somehow blacks were most of the nobility? The mere fact that those listed in the video are even noticed at all is because they're black and an extreme anomaly in European history. If blacks founded Europe, the white aristocrats would be the anomaly and we'd be watching a video about them. See if your common sense can overpower your inferiority complex for just a minute.
    1
  35. Actually, Vikings were taller than average for their day.
    1
  36.  @jorad4887  So, it sounds like all your "evidence" is just circumstantial and anecdotal, which is very unreliable "evidence." I have circumstantial and anecdotal evidence too, which proves just the opposite, but I would never use it to prove anything to anyone (btw, I'm a Scandinavian American, whose family also comes from a Scandinavian community, who also has relatives in Scandinavia. And, even though my daughter is almost 6 foot and my son is 6'5", I would never use that as evidence for anything). Besides contemporary descriptions of the Norse and Vikings by outsiders, who described them as significantly taller than other people, including other Europeans. Scandinavians today, are also among the world's tallest people. Harold Hardrada, a Viking, was over 7 feet tall. However, the best and most reliable, evidence is the study of Norse burials, which show the Vikings to be almost as tall, on average, as modern Scandinavians and are shown to have been, on average, taller than other contemporary Europeans. However, if you've ever studied height averages, you'd understand that averages can be misleading because you can have a lot of tall people, but then a few really short people can skew your averages. Any way, if you really want to know the truth, instead of just listening to a few of your friends and calling more informed people a 'liar," you'll need to pick up a book and read it.
    1
  37.  @jorad4887  Btw, I assume you just made a typo except with your other faulty "facts" maybe it was intentional and you're just horribly uniformed. The Viking age wasn't any where near 800 BC. It was between 740 to 1066 AD. So, you're only about a thousand years off. Btw, you'll notice I didn't call you a liar. I assume you either just made a typo or are just incredibly uniformed.
    1
  38. Delusional fantasy held by someone with a huge inferiority complex.
    1
  39.  @olmecgods7  What does any of that even mean? I can't tell what you're even trying to say. Are you saying that because the achievements of black people are hidden in America, that therefore, blacks negroes were the original inhabitants of Europe? That's your "evidence?" No wonder you all are so delusional.
    1
  40. It's not true that "most royal houses" carry his genes. He does have a few descendants who have survived and who are mostly in a few british minor nobility.
    1
  41.  @lac8494  Umm. How do you know that your ancestors were black negro nobles from Scotland? They either weren't your ancestors or they weren't black negro. You're fabricating something.
    1
  42.  @lac8494  "I want the source of who she bought her freedom from, Name of owner, Ship she came on, relationship to slave owner, and receipts, thank you." It's ironic how you demand such detailed proof regarding something which goes against your desired belief, but when you make the most absurd unfounded extreme claims (i.e. all the black negro nobility in Europe, and that it was so common as to be considered normal), you don't have to be held to the same standard of proof. So, be consistent. What's your proof in the same detail you require of others (btw, you won't be able to provide it, because it's not true).
    1
  43.  @lac8494  Through geneolocial records, which my family and people have meticulously kept for hundreds of years, I can trace my family on both sides for hundreds and even a few thousand years in several cases. Btw, I'm not denying you can too. I'm just saying that IF you can trace your ancestry to a noble Scottish ancestor (who I'm certain weren't black negro), I doubt you have any evidence to back up your claim (saying, "they were definitely black" isn't proof)? Also, you likely can't trace any of your black negro ancestry very far and, if you somehow can, it'll lead straight back to Africa.
    1
  44.  @lac8494  What evidence do I have to provide? YOU'RE the one making absurd claims, which go contrary to accepted history. The burden of proof is on YOU. But, I'll be shocked if you ever even attempt to provide it because we both know it won't be evidence of what you claim (that you're descended from BLACK NEGRO Scotish nobles). What I've found is that those who make the most absurd claims regarding their heritage or of black negroes in European history, when ever you call them on it, instead of offering any proof, they tend to try to shift the burden of proof on anyone but themselves (as though their absurd claims are self-evident. They're only "self-evident" to desparate people withan inferiority complex), and then pretend to be offended and accuse anyone questioning them, as racist. You seem to be fitting the mold pretty good. Sorry if I've come accross as critical. That just been my experience.
    1
  45.  @lac8494  Your last comment, "Ok, It's obvious you're an idiot, who is upset about his ws being challenged. Have you done any research for yourself or are you just a mindless sheep? I'm going with the latter, I am not saying that slavery didn't exist, what I am saying is that not all black people were slaves neither did they all come from the same place in 1619. Your assumptions are getting on my nerves, did I say my main source was the internet? You have not heard of Government records? you know Births, deaths, Marriages, migration records, war records, Burke's peerage. No sounds too much like hard work to you. Read what Benjamin Franklin, your home boy said and then research what he said and then come back with an intelligent argument, until then have a nice day and keep dreaming about slavery cos you might just get your wish, if you have "white guilt" that on you. I have no inferiority complex, in fact you're beneath me." ALL I SAID WAS THAT YOU DIDN'T DESCEND FROM A BLACK NEGRO SCOTTISH NOBLE, BECAUSE THERE ISN'T SUCH A THING. THAT'S IT. AND, YOU STILL HAVEN'T OFFERED ANY EVIDENCE.
    1
  46.  @lac8494  Your last comment, "Btw, as as side, do you actually think Cleopatra was was a black negro? If I say I'm an American what colour would you assume I was??? The pharaohs were Nubian's so I'm not sure why it is assumed she was white and ruled over a Nation of black Egyptians. another clumsy attempt to white wash history" ACTUALLY, IF YOU ACTUALLY STUDIED HISTORY YOU'D KNOW THAT CLEOPATRA NOT ONLY WASN'T BLACK, SHE WASN'T EVEN ETHNICALLY EGYPTIAN. YOU ARE AWARE SHE WAS GREEK, RIGHT? They actually have contemporary likenesses of her that show her to have been European. Here, I'll help you out a little: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra So, if you're so completely wrong about Cleopatra, there's a strong likelihood that you may just just as wrong about a lot of your claims.
    1
  47.  @lac8494  The fact that you don't understand the definition of the European word "swarthy" and that you're using your misunderstood and misconstrued defintion as "evidence" for your absurd claims, should be an embarrassment to afrocentrists everywhere. You're way out of your league here. You propbably ought to quit while you're behind.
    1
  48.  @lac8494  Well, can't argue with your agreeing with me. Thanks. It was nice to end on a good note.
    1
  49.  @lac8494  "It's to be expected from someone who lacks intelligence or class. showing your true genetic makeup" Don't you realize what a racist statement that is? To criticize someone and then claim that it's because of their "genetic makeup," isn't any less racist than a nazi or the most virulent white supremacist. You're exposing your true colors. Blatant racism is usually a symptom of an extreme inferiority complex. I don't think that because of your race or "genetic makeup." I think that because of your character and behavior (see the difference?).
    1
  50.  @lac8494  Nazis and white supremacists claim others are genetically inferiory too. You did exactly the same thing and we all saw it.
    1