Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Tim: *says words* Ben Shapiro: Finally, a worthy opponent
    193
  2.  @MistaOneGuy  Joe's insistence that the Clinton Foundation was worse than Trump's deal with Ukraine was met with 'it should be nipped in the bud out of principle, they're both (acknowledging that Joe's opinion is...an opinion) equally egregious'. Where exactly is the dodging here?
    85
  3.  @MEOIT83  They also have a smaller budget to work with. The U.S. has a huge GDP per capita compared to Canada's (about $15,000 difference). There is no excuse, sorry. Even Russia can cover all of its citizens and its by no means homogenous (like the classic alt right examples of Japan and Norway lel).
    74
  4.  @MistaOneGuy  How was the example a 'dud'? It's a demonstration of Trump's business dealings with Saudi Arabia while he ran for office, a clear violation of the Emoluments Clause. Are you just saying it's a dud because you don't want it to be true?
    69
  5.  @MistaOneGuy  You numbskull... that IS the evidence! Trump made money off of a foreign government!!! That is a violation of the Emoluments Clause, clear as day!! How else can I spell it out? Saudi royals stay at hotel which Trump owned, Trump was running for President at the time. Is it sinking in? Trump took money from a foreign government. His interests cannot be trusted, and even if they could, he still broke Constitutional law.
    63
  6.  @MistaOneGuy  Fine, no insults. No, What I'm saying is Trump shouldn't have any businesses while running for or residing in office. Reagan stopped acting, Carter gave up his peanut farm, the Bushes gave up their oil companies. if they hadn't, they would also, like Trump, be violating the Emoluments Clause. You're right, there is nothing else to say. That is the smoking gun. Trump violated the Constitution while President, and should be impeached, and promptly removed from office. End of story.
    55
  7.  The Flying Dutchman  You'd also be destroying most of the Abrahamic holy sites, not saying that's good or bad but it would piss literally most of the world off
    51
  8. Depends on where you live. In poorer areas, it could be severely unprofitable to go and get healthy food. The amount of time spent getting out of your neighborhood, into a nicer one with a grocery store, waiting for (let's be honest, if you're poor) the bus to arrive, plus the upfront cost of it and time spent preparing it? That adds up to time otherwise spent earning more money, and tips the scales in favor of unhealthy food (again, depends on your proximity to healthy food).
    27
  9. @logina10473 No, it's probably because the damage he causes to Russia's reputation is much smaller than the damage he causes to America, just by being alive and continuing to report on the NSA'a activities.
    27
  10. She puts the ass in assassin, twice :D
    18
  11. Two-bullets-to-the-back-of-the-head-anoma... :'(
    16
  12.  @Gvozd111  Do you mean the little 'x' in the corner of the Recommended videos bar? I've tried it, it just pops up again a few days later. Especially if it's TV show content— Ellen, Jimmy Kimmel, etc.
    16
  13.  @dominictumulty1531  I don't think I've ever seen more naivete in a single comment. Do financial restrictions mean nothing to you? The quality of food you eat, family situation, external life events, initial circumstances, all have a strong effect on whether or not you will succeed. You didn't have a good answer to what he said so you spouted bs platitudes about the all-too-familiar "pull yourself up by your own bootstraps!" idea. "Just don't get that degree" is complete garbage. Somebody has to get that degree! You're all too willing to preach to engineers and software developers that they "should've just gone into a trade" but you still need security updates to your computer. Your phone needs to be updated to the latest version. Chefs and servers get a lot of shit for 'not making the right choices' but the entire restaurant industry would die if not for their hard work-- for little pay, no less. You don't get to complain about the things you directly benefit from. If everyone followed your advice (and picked the safest, highest paying career), we'd all be screwed.
    12
  14.  @RagingBullNuts  Yes, because they monologue more. With liberal guests it's an actual interview. If, for example, Joe challenged Alex Jones the way he did Tulsi Gabbard, he'd go his typical apeshit. The conservative guests like coming on because they know they won't be seriously questioned. That's why Joe can pull so many guests— he's the ultimate softball interviewer.
    11
  15.  @Fabio-Galante  A vaccine will effectively halt the virus in its tracks, and the whole point of flattening the curve is so that, even in the absence of herd immunity, some people will have had the virus pass through them fully and are unlikely to catch it to that extent again.
    10
  16. @Sebastian How is the swamp drained? His Treasury Secretary is a Goldman Sachs executive- worse than that, he's one of the ones that kept lending subprime loans after the 2008 crash! Does no know remember this anymore?! His Secretary of Education never went to public school or even set foot in one! His EPA Director doesn't believe in climate change! Whether or not you think that's true or not, he should at least do his job of taking care of America's environment, instead he did nothing while the Dakota XL pipeline was being built through protected areas! He is the swamp!
    9
  17.  @johnrogers235  I don't think he's wrong- there's plenty of research poking into the issue, before Weinstein even became a grad student. This took me all of 5 minutes: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002005 https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/28/22/4474/2383801 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867401800064 What's very important to remember, even more than the content, is the situation itself. You are watching a Joe Rogan podcast/interview, on YouTube. To turn a phrase from Mark McLuhan, the medium is the message. The context surrounding the information you're taking in informs you of its character and, possibly, validity. In this case, a biologist has taken 3 full hours, and at least a few more to plan and arrive, to do a media appearance. In most scientific fields, consistently doing that often indicates a lack of current research (you can only devote so much time if you're constantly doing public speaking events) or a lack of credibility (Ken Ham, every Theology PhD, Bill Nye- yes, him too. Marketing yourself as a scientist generally tells you that there is a reason to do so unrelated to actual science). Most scientists- especially prolific ones- genuinely don't have the time to interview, or to hone their communication skills. I was only able to find 2 publications where he was directly involved, and most scientists haven't registered a website with their name as the domain. Or a Ted Talk, or multiple media appearances. Again, not damning, but something to consider. That's also not to say that every single person on Joe Rogan's podcast is a 'fraud', but if someone is well-known and just so happens to be very media-focused, don't ignore that. Dr. Oz does have an MD, but he does weekly TV appearances on his own show. That's crucial information and should be the lens through which you look at what he's telling you. Oftentimes it's so obvious (because it's woven into your knowledge of them to begin with), that you can forget that it's there altogether. Don't miss the frame for the painting. Sorry for the text block, just bored and wanted to help out, since I was waiting foe his reply too lol
    9
  18.  @sebione3576  If I'm not mistaken, the idea behind white privelege is not declaring that every white person has it easier than any nonwhite person, but that they have advantages unique to white Americans, regardless of circumstance. For instance, people with 'white' sounding names get more callbacks for jobs, even when their application is identical to a nonwhite person's. https://www.sociologicalscience.com/articles-v4-19-469/ White people and black people smoke weed at about the same rate, but black people who are arrested for it receive harsher sentences for the identical crime. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/tables/table-43 Barely anyone on the left thinks that 'privilege' is solely economic (although that does, statistically, come into play). It's just harsher treatment from institutions wherever they can still get away with it. Plausible deniability is a powerful tool.
    9
  19. USASPORTSCARDS That's a great way to thin the middle class out. Especially lower-middle to lower, which are the backbone of the U.S.'s dirty work (what is left of manufacturing, low paying jobs that are desperately needed in the public sector, etc.). From an individual point of view, I see what you mean. However, if everyone has that same view, then massive and negative changes take place. Same reason I wouldn't tell Americans complaining about high college debt that "you should've gone into a trade!" If millions of people actually did that, a huge section of our economy would go into free fall.
    8
  20. No scientists are already telling outlets they're concerned with the coming spike, it's just not on the media because it's drowned out by the protests. You need to be aware of what you're not seeing, too. Just because it's not on the tv doesn't mean it's not happening.
    8
  21.  @captaincannabis3321  I agree, that's what he was probably hoping for. But it still baffles me that the cop didn't get that people's capacity to make good choices decreases over time with drug use. They'll still take the bag, shitty or not.
    8
  22.  @ka0t1k1  Nice job dodging the issue. Why won't you address the fact that your money isn't that which you've earned on your own, but taken from the work of others? If you want to be Ayn Rand's wet dream, then stop using roads, electricity, and water. Why are you mooching off of others to take care of your needs? Dig your own well, build your own drive to work, power your own home, stop being useless.
    7
  23.  @bennymountain1  Well, no one's saying that. I just meant the areas where there really are no good options— bodegas and liquor stores for blocks. Of course you can whip something up from virtually anything (although you also need to know to even buy those things in the first place— if mom's too busy working, trying to give you a better future, to teach you to cook— how are you gonna be healthy later in life?), circumstances make it difficult for some people.
    7
  24. 6:07 "If they could make that into a slogan; "I just want to feel normal again", that would be like a MAGA for them". Wait until this guy hears about 'Return To Normalcy', he'll lose his shit! We truly live in the strangest timeline..
    7
  25.  @GreenGearMood  I think you havent experienced the world very much. There are millions of guys who made it on charisma alone, or skill, and face only gets you so far. If you're creepy or miserable, Adonis' face can't save you. A house needs a foundation, just like a person needs a person-ality. Sincerely hope you ditch the defeatist attittude. If you really are that ugly, you're not doing yourself any more favors by also being a depressing void. Height and face matter, but there's no 'order' to it. If you're lacking both, you can still be attractive by strengthening other areas.
    6
  26. I will say, though, that it's a lot harder to shield a scientist's work from the public than a priest. Can't exactly rape a co-worker like an alter boy...
    6
  27. It's collateral, sadly. If the police can't reform, then they need to be forced to. And it looks like to get this omelet (reform), we need to break a few eggs. I absolutely don't support it, but it's happening, and I think it's a natural part of crowd behavior.
    6
  28.  @ka0t1k1  Someday, you'll be useless too. What will you do then?
    6
  29.  @ka0t1k1  Making 7 figures and rising. I can say things on the internet, too! Even if that's true, it doesn't solve the larger problem. Not everyone will be a millionaire (don't fight statistics here), and they will eventually need medical care. Bear in mind those useless people you're referring to earned your million, not you. Unless you're willing to posit that Jeff Bezos is working at least ~1,400 times harder than you.
    6
  30.  @gargantuanblunt  Two things: 1) The problem is, we remember (and became viewers on) YouTube for a different experience. From 2008-12, random Recommended videos would be almost all of your sidebar and it was so much fun just getting lost in them. There was even the old joke "Looks like I'm on that side of YouTube again.." ..that never happens anymore. To trade that for a few occasional videos still related to what you already watch is a travesty, and we hate it. 2) This kind of kills the whole point of Recommended videos— it's supposed to be enjoyable, not an exercise. If I have to actively work against the algorithm to get what I want out of a videos streaming website, it's a bad website.
    6
  31.  @DangerErin  And they're more likely to let journalists in on their owl-worshipping ritual... right..
    5
  32.  @joshdunham7167  Sure- he was found in the 1970's to illegally bar black tenants from renting apartments on his properties; he said in 1993 at a Congressional hearing (complaining about competition from Indian casinos) "they don't look like Indians to me" and (if you want to be very literal with the definition of racist) John O'Donnell, President of Trump's hotel in Atlantic City mentioned him saying, "Black guys counting my money! I hate it. The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys wearing yarmulkes… Those are the only kind of people I want counting my money. Nobody else…Besides that, I tell you something else. I think that’s guy’s lazy. And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks.” He didn't dispute it at the time, said in 1997 that what he said was "probably true", and only in 2000 when he was running for office did he deny ever saying that. How convenient... doesn't really matter though. Between all he's done and accusing Obama of being a Muslim Kenyan, he's a racist. End of story.
    5
  33.  @reelgangstazskip  It's a play on words (his comment).
    5
  34.  @tacostwiceaweekMAX  No, at the time the Saudis paid over $200K to stay a collective 500 nights, Trump personally owned the hotel. They paid in December 2016: https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-hotel-in-washington-d-c-to-open-ahead-of-schedule-1454901018 https://web.archive.org/web/20161002024408/http://www.fox5dc.com/news/204637134-story And he only gave the Trump Organization, which through which he owned the D.C. hotel, in January 2017, finalizing the transfer in mid-January. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38587628 He received the Saudi money. All of it. He's gonna get impeached. Even if that doesn't work, this is a permanent stain on his Presidency that can never be undone. It's shameful that he was this careless and reckless. Not even going to bring up that his fucking kids are working in the White House with him, and the only reason he's not thrown out on his ass, out of the Capitol, for nepotism, is because of a legal loophole.
    5
  35.  @MistaOneGuy  I'm not talking about how smart he is. I'm talking about what he did. Why are you dancing around the issue with 'maybe'? He took a thing of value (in this instance, money) from a foreign government. That is not only Unconstitutional, it presents an enormous conflict of interests beyond just shady lobbying. This is directly bribing the President, like an oil company would do with a Congressman (which is itself extremely problematic). I should remind you, his lawyer has incriminated him by accident a few weeks ago. I should hope he has better legal connections than that- he's going to need them.
    5
  36.  @DVS1NYC  I'm not talking about Ukraine; the evidence for that is still being worked through. I'm talking about Trump taking Saudi money and violating the Emoluments Clause by doing that.
    5
  37.  @DVS1NYC  Yes, it was. How many times do I have to repeat this? Trump's D.C. hotel- which he personally owned- had Saudi guests who paid him $200K for ~500 nights at the hotel. This was in December 2016. Trump handed over the Trump Organization, and by extension ownership of the D.C. hotel, in January 2017. Which means, he received the money from the Saudis. He might not leave office or get impeached. But he will be only one of two presidents to face impeachment proceedings- him and Richard Nixon. That's a bad look for the Trump name, for the rest of history lmao Can't undo that no matter how hard you try. Oh, and he might get impeached. We don't know yet. Better start counting your lucky stars now
    5
  38. Well, America would finally learn the feeling of a war with someone that could actually attack it's civilians, so far it's been bombing people while holding behind the protection of the Atlantic..
    5
  39.  Mike Fitzpatrick  Don't underestimate the cartels. Your weekends at the range don't compare to a drug war
    5
  40.  @ka0t1k1  Lol, everyone's gonna be a millionaire. Oh, but you'll actually do it! Because.. you're you, of course! You're the protagonist, and as long as you work hard things will work out! Like Disney told you!
    5
  41. Not at this level, since political machines in the 1890's. Imagine if Obama's daughters were getting $83M in a year. Don't hold Trump to a double standard, he's extremely corrupt, he has his kids working with him as 'advisors' in the White House, all the time. C'mon.
    4
  42.  @ruinerfixxxer  Just a friendly reminder that Fox is the main cause of this problem among Americans- look at any segment of theirs on Israel, they always mention it in pairs "Jewish, or Israeli [insert noun]"- to defend Israel's political actions with accusations of anti-semitism. They've done that, too. Don't like Israel? Racist! China has employed the same tactic.
    4
  43. You're clearly not familiar with 'the left.' There is now a distinction between the Democrats and the left, and the leftists dislike Obama almost as much as you do. We see him as a spineless progressive (mouth-breathing conservatives love to rail on Obamacare like it's a liberal policy, when Obama was forced, if he wanted any bill to show up on his desk, to take it word-for-word from the Heritage Foundation. That bill was Republican to its core). You see him as a radical Communist/Muslim? (Two opposing ideas there, you guys need to make up your mind quick otherwise you'll give away your real reason for not liking him!)
    4
  44. Debunked? Lol. Race isn't a thing. IQ isn't a thing. You can take tutoring classes to raise your IQ. If it's inherent and based in biology, why can you raise it??? Also, race isn't a thing. Middle Easterners and Japanese were white, until they weren't. Define race, please. And define IQ. If they're real things, explain how they're objective. I'm waiting.
    4
  45.  @tacostwiceaweekMAX  That sounds like something you say when you can't attack the actual argument. Why don't you prove me wrong? Did Trump not, in fact, receive something of value from the Saudis, thereby violating the Emoluments Clause- which is unconstitutional, and grounds for Impeachment?
    4
  46.  @DVS1NYC  *Emoluments. Get it right. He did give control of the company to his sons, but like I said before, he did that after receiving Saudi money. And, he still has a stake in the company, and has expressed that he wants to go back to the company once his term(s) is over. They're not dismissed- that case is literally what the impeachment proceedings are about. Now we wait...
    4
  47. I for one can't wait to watch. My candidate's gone, so I'm grabbing the popcorn and enjoying the downfall of global respect (whatever was left of it) for American governance.
    4
  48.  Mike Fitzpatrick  Lol, and dropping your plate is a nuclear disaster. Try visiting Tepic or Tijuana and then tell me that your town is a 'war zone.'
    4
  49.  @actualfactual8737  Lmao gr8 b8, does Musk, Bezos, Gates, or Walton sound Jewish to you??? Here's a hint: they're South African, Cuban/Norwegian, English, and Dutch.
    4
  50.  @jmsolano0516  ...What? No one said "all Israelis", Gal Gadot is just being labelled as an Israeli citizen, which she is. He's saying that her being from Israel makes her comment on borders ridiculous and hypocritical. It's not a generalization; it's just an adjective for her only
    3