Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "JRE Clips"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Adam-dn5oc
Yes, that's right! The point's clearly gone over your head, so I'll say it real nice and clearly:
cracking your joints isn't a long term solution.
Your knuckles, and every other joint in your body, reform the nitrogen bubbles very quickly. Going to a chiropractor who looks to crack your (whatever body part) is pointless. You can go back in a few weeks to another chiropractor and receive the same diagnosis-
"you have x pain, x range of motion! Let's crack your joints to fix that!"
If you're able to re-crack of all those joints within a short time period, then what has the chiropractor actually done for you?
"Popping/cracking your joints can provide relief by relaxing muscles and improving range of motion."
That's the problem, dumbass- they don't!
Explain please, how the fuck joints have any effect on the tension of muscle fibers, or the tendons connecting to them. They don't interact with each other!!! How the fuck does your chiropractor explain it to you?!!! I'd genuinely like to hear what comes out of his mouth. Please, 'enlighten' me.
Range of motion, are you insane?!! Forcefully jolting your joints and muscles around is the exact opposite of what you want to do to increase range of motion!! If your range of motion is decreased because of muscle tightness, jerking them around like ragdolls will only cause you to pull, or god forbid tear, one of those muscles.
Same with joints or tendons. They aren't dislocated shoulders, you can't just yank them back into place. They need to be trained, over time. They can gain or lose flexibility, depending on your habits.
Oh, and "spinal subluxations" aren't a thing. They have no medical definition. It's complete jackshit.
I can't believe these basic concepts, easily discoverable through personal physical experience, are lost upon you. This is really sad to me.
3
-
@Adam-dn5oc
Yes, I did.
What you're advocating for is anti-scientific and physically dangerous. Every second spent convincing someone that people shouldn't jerk their own necks around like a dog's chew toy is worth it.
If chiropractic isn't a long-term solution, then why the hell do you support it? It isn't an emergent solution to some incurable problem- you could spend similar amounts of money on an osteopath, massage or physical therapist and stop having to go to them altogether within a year's time! With the same- permanent- results!
Also, you don't re-align your tire by pushing it back into place. Bad analogy.
And that (not popping your joints on your own) is why you should instead focus on what's keeping you simply moving your neck or back along its full range of motion to begin with.
General medical consensus is that cracking your joints too forcefully or too often is what perpetuates pain- you know, the thing that you get done with regular visits to a chiropractic?
Wow, it's almost as if that's not what I'm referring to. Imagine getting fully "healed" by a chiropractic, coming back a few weeks or months later, and having the same issues be "solved." Still have "spinal subluxations"? (you didn't address that, because it's horseshit and you know it is)
"We'll just crack your joints again! You're fixed! ...see you in a few months, when your harmless air bubbles reform!"
Also, if ("may take multiple visits") really is the case, then please show me the study(ies) that demonstrate what part of the spine can only be fixed with numerous sessions of pushing against joints and popping air bubbles.
It's not an opinion. What you said is false.
Cavitation just describes the phenomenon of cracking your joints. Small cavities of air inside the synovial fluid in our joints collapse, causing the "cracking" sound. More of a pop, really.
Nerves shouldn't stretch- actually, they can, but this causes injuries, such as carpal tunnel, if we're talking about nerves in the hand.
If you meant to say that "stretching" nerves improves their movement through our joints, then you're wrong about that too. The restriction of nerve movement is- surprise!- inactivity, and subsequent muscle tension. Stretch the muscles, and your nerves will be fine. I should also add that "stimulating the nerves" happens all the time- otherwise you wouldn't feel anything. You'll have to be more specific.
Now, imagine being so spiteful and dumb that you resort to name-calling instead of addressing the rest of the arguments.
I'm not taking shit from a man who believed that you can regenerate complex parts of the ear by pressing on a spinal joint. Look up your brilliant founder.
Instead of acting like a 5-year old, you wanna start discussing facts? Or retreat back into the world of re-enacting murder scenes in a pseudo-doctor's office?
With a camera, of course- everyone knows that the best doctors have to advertise how good they are on YouTube.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dominykask0742
If by supernatural you mean, beyond testable and measures means, then sure. Something supernatural had to have happened before the Big Bang, because everything in our universe follows our natural laws (physics, thermodynamics, etc).
I don't, however, see why that automatically means that a deity, much less something sentient, would have to have caused it.
Also, multiverse theory is based on a simple concept, that every change in the universe that occurs is simply a branching off point between two events— for example, you either propose to your wife or you don't.
If you did, then this is the universe where that happened. So what happens to the possibility that you didn't? Everything in our universe is tangible in some way, so you can't just wave it away as "it didn't happen".
It has to be expressed somewhere— in another universe.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@yosefmacgruber1920
1) You must not understand how airplanes work very well.
Generally, autopilot will take over the duration of the flight, with the exception of the takeoff, landing, and taxi. i.e., all the basic functions that a driver tends to behind the wheel in the form of starting, stopping, and turning.
Pilots are still expected to be mindful of the plane's flight, and only extremely new models can land themselves (which was my point- we are just barely scratching the surface, and it will take decades to reach the consumer market at large scale).
2) They can, but again, pilots need to land and navigate the plane in poor conditions. This is why every runway is plastered in guiding lights.
3) Not sure what you're saying here- I'm just being realistic. I'm extremely excited to see electric, self-driving cars take off, but hyping yourself up will leave you with deflated expectations.
4) Obviously, the cars (the drivers, rather) will travel cross-country. I'm just basing my prediction off of what we currently have, which is precisely what I said- navigational systems can't deal with snow and poor visibility yet. Tesla's entire lineup freaks out under bridges and in snow, thinking every snowflake is a lane line. It's simply the reality right now.
When the cars come to market, they'll be allowed to self-drive in certain regions/weather conditions, and drivers will need to take over in poorer conditions, or farther north.
5) They do, but radar and especially lidar- the main technology behind getting to Level 5 (as opposed to the current 2) cars won't work in some regions without en entirely new technology or workaround.
For this reason, liberal cities will receive the earliest forms of the technology first, because most of them (in the U.S.) are in sunny or temperate climates.
2