Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1.  Thomas Miller  The Inquisition, then the U.S.S.R. (yea some Bolsheviks had partial Jewish decsent- and that stopped them from killing other Jews, why??? They hated capitalist Jewish bankers, don't bring me that autistic 4Chan argument please) and Nazi Germany. Oh, and the Babylonians, Romans and then early Ottomans. They have been persecuted many times, facts don't care about your feelings. Accept when you're wrong
    2
  2.  @dustinpowell5981  Lol, Puritan mindset there, can't believe it's festered for over 200 years now. How about instead of getting a crime boner over every arrest, you ask why these people are committing the crimes? Is the man homeless and starving? Is he a kid that doesn't know any better? You want a crime of necessity to cost thousands of dollars to the taxpayer? You want to foot the bill when he's booked, processed, and held? Or just invest in businesses that will let him work and earn his own keep? Housing caused the gang problems, housing will solve it. Invest in businesses in the area, build public transport to the area, desegregate the city (Chicago has some leftover conservative policies making it one of the segregated in America) and change will come.
    2
  3.  @dandroff1512  No, it will solve what it addresses. People will continue to human traffic, kidnap, and murder, until they are de-incentivized to do so. Are you telling me no other country on Earth has people who do this? These things only happen in the U.S.? That's a joke. Humans will be humans, whether or not you like it. Poland was politically unified against the Soviet Union for the last 70 years, until it gained independence and realized it had people in its own country causing problems, too. The world isn't just made of countries. It's made of people. And those people need to helped, or stopped. People will stop looking to hard drugs for pleasure when their lives offer more fulfillment to them than drugs can.
    2
  4. Yeah, but they're bigger than most fake dogs
    2
  5.  @allenhicks1245  What? The banjo is an African instrument
    2
  6. Dallas VanLoozen Not sure I agree. At least in the projects, people can go out into the world and learn (even if those skills will land then in jail), being a troublemaker is far better than being smothered and completely incompetent by the time you go off to college. Both rich and poor parents are guilty of this, but at least if you're poor you develop a drive to succeed. Getting everything you want usually leads to a loss of ambition, and we've seen what happens to child actors.
    1
  7. Someone doesn't know what's meant by "defund"...
    1
  8.  Alfonso G  Lol, lizards are cold blooded. Unless the elites are all in Africa they'd all die from their bodies shutting down. Open your eyes to the world. They're not ducking reptiles, they're just very greedy and corrupt, David Icke.
    1
  9.  @TJTerpsGaming  Since when does 60 days = 3 months? And cost wise, would you rather get your hip surgery RIGHT AWAY, and then struggle paying it off for the next few years? Or just lose a few months of wages?
    1
  10. @5 Star GM Lol nah, you think she likes China and Xi? You think she'd let 300,000 people in before closing the borders then claiming she acted so quickly? You think she'd ignore the military briefing in 2017, and again in early January, instead of closing the borders down right away? gtfo with your clinton derangement syndrome, orange man's not that good
    1
  11.  @bw7754  Because the judicial system and law enforcement system in the United States have not, as of yet, responded to peaceful calls for reform. There have been peaceful protests against police brutality (just marching) following every widely covered murder... and yet random black men are consistently being killed under dubious circumstances and without probable cause to engage, certainly not to the point of killing your criminal suspect (from a police point of view). Violence is the only language they understand, so they will be forced to reform and train police officers better in de-escalation as opposed to mostly marksmanship (shooting). All we want is reform to the police. They didn't respond when we didn't kill anyone, for years on end, so now they will. Tough shit.
    1
  12. Lol, Joe the infallible, scholarly source.. What you said is measurably false. It's America with the problem. American healtthcare is only world-class... at the very top!! For average people, the vast majority of people actually using the services, it's often identical (usually worse) to European or Canadian healthcare. Except, you have to pay out of pocket for every visit and the drug companies can charge whatever they want. Land of the Fee! https://www.jhsph.edu/news/news-releases/2019/us-health-care-spending-highest-among-developed-countries.html
    1
  13. Sure, because they all stand to make more than they would under Medicare for all. Higher medical supply costs get passed along to consumers, hospitals and doctors take a cut because no one's looking, or counting. Also, which school??
    1
  14. I mean, Israelis and Americans have that "stereotype" in common, where their government swaddles them with financial support and they turn around and act like others have it worse because they haven't "tried hard enough".
    1
  15.  @viewerone  No, but you do have flawed behaviors. The human body isn't designed to take the kind of neck strain you're putting on it, hence your pain. You even said it yourself. Instead of constantly putting bandages on your problem, fix its cause. Get a better, more ergonomic chair. Change your seated posture. Work out your back muscles to counteract the slouching neck and rounded shoulders that develops as a result of using technology. Aside from genetic disorders, there are no flawed (functionally impaired) bodies. Only ones that are put into poor environments. Change your environment or behavior, and you'll start to fix your body as well.
    1
  16.  Boondock Saint  Those two aren't mutually exclusive. Nor are opiates the end-all, be-all of pain relief. It's usually easier to just work out and balance your muscles, or to alternate between standing and sitting, instead of paying someone to do something you can do at home.
    1
  17.  @don3465  If you know about School House Rock, then you also know that the President doesn't pass laws. Congress does. Don't post stupid bullshit and you won't get nasty replies, dumbass.
    1
  18.  @bobsmith-ru4lf  In which ways?
    1
  19.  @bobsmith-ru4lf  If you want to spread the 'burden' evenly, just bring it up. It's not like any nation can really ignore you. You'd lose your martyrdom card, so pick wisely. I sincerely hope you don't think anyone should kowtow to you for doing something we can (and should) all do together.
    1
  20.  @wyattlong8321  So, no answer? If a white person can breed with a black person, then they're not different races. Biologically, we're all part of the human race. We're all the same species. Sorry bud.
    1
  21.  @wyattlong8321  Right, but "it's in the dictionary" doesn't mean "it has a measurable basis in biology". If race has a concrete, scientific definition, I'd love to hear. But as far as I'm concerned, race is something we made up. Why are Hungarians and Austrians both called white? Hungarians are Magyar, they come from Central Asia. What about Spaniards? Or Sicilians? Their skin isn't even white! Are Jews white? Middle Eastern? Are Arabs white? Asian? Are Arabs and Chinese the same because they're both Asian? Race is a load of bullshit. It's not specific, quantifiable, or proven. Too bad
    1
  22.  @rainman11985  Right, that changes nothing. We're all the same species, and can breed. And again, sub-species is determined by a taxonomist; it's not quantifiable. Different species can be differentiated by not being able to breed. Sub-species are something we decide on. Which brings me back to my question: what is the biological basis for race? Are Indians a "sub-species"? What about Pakistanis? Are they the same as Indians? Are Arabs and Chinese the same because they're both Asian? Are Greeks and Jews white? The terms we use (white, black, Asian) aren't biologically meaningful, so saying that "black people are dumb" doesn't mean anything. West Africans? East Africans? Egyptians? Who are you talking about here? And why can you raise your IQ score, if it's supposed to be a measure of unchanging biological intelligence??
    1
  23.  @IChIDH  "Criminals always ignore the law, that's why murder laws are fuckin stupid"
    1
  24. @fire rises ...Indianapolis is tiny compared to Chicago. It's like asking 'why does Vatican City have so few gun deaths??' Also, crime is rising in their cities, too. They just have a smaller starting point.
    1
  25.  @sandlotscout6358  I don't support his idea but, r/whoosh dude. He's a Trump supporter, mocking a Democrat's argument
    1
  26.  @Abc-hn5vz  Because Indiana is mostly corn fields? Not as many people, not as many births, weddings, deaths, crime, less of everything goes on there. Also, have you been to Gary? I'd take Chicago over that shithole any day.
    1
  27. @fire rises Wrong Trumptard
    1
  28.  @endlessslumber441  20% of Chicago's guns come from Indiana- and those are just the ones confiscated by police. Another 10% come from Michigan and Wisconsin.
    1
  29. Unfortunately you can't get an unbiased view. Unless you wanna trudge through the most boring, numbers-based report of all time, there will be some bias. It's natural— it's how people dissect the world and its categories. I guess reinstating the Fairness Doctrine would help, but then old people would complain about how the news is boring.
    1
  30.  Harry Garrett  That has more to do with the integrity of each individual tooth, not the shape of their arch. The 'look' of your teeth is different now because your tongue (from not having needed to coax fibrous food down as you swallow) doesn't rest at the roof of your mouth. As you grow, your skull adapts to whatever forces are placed on it, so if you don't keep your tongue there, it will affect your breathing, which will affect your facial development. In adulthood you can't really change this (which is why I disagree with Dr Mew), but from ages 5-12 much can still be done.
    1
  31. @Stephen Smith ?? I think most countries are. Unless you want to suggest that corn fields and oxycontin-addicted cousin fuckers is a suitable alternative. It's the same everywhere. Outside the cities, everything's shit
    1
  32.  Ron Burgundy  Hahaha settle down dude. I bet you also say shit like 'while you were fucking girls I studied the blade' lmaooo Your analysis is extremely vague, narrow minded, and historically inaccurate. But even if it were none of those things, that wasn't even the point of my comment!! Gr8 b8 m8. But YouTube trolls have lost the war since 2010. Go beg someone else for attention. Maybe your mom.
    1
  33.  @sterlingbates1558  Are you a statistician? Where'd you get that percentage from?
    1
  34.  @buffoonustroglodytus4688  Not her fault- pretty sure she's admitted a few times that she hates doing the show, but the network has her on a contract so she keeps doing a job that she hates. That would age anyone pretty damn fast
    1
  35.  kkthxk  Lol yep. Just be careful, make any pastor rape jokes and it's over for you
    1
  36.  @corvoattano4777  In some ways it is though.. also, isn't that common knowledge? I mean even if you've never left, you're bound to have heard or seen some criticism of the U.S.
    1
  37.  @franquil85conn  Most of Europe lol, that includes freedom of speech. In fact, some places have more listed freedoms than the U.S..
    1
  38.  @ilyaivanov9283  I think the way it really works, is convenience. In every country, free speech tends to be permitted as long as it has no power. For example, in China, anti-China literature is available! 1984 and other works are sold on shops— but you will never find a Chinese author on the shelves. Nor will you find literature from the Dalai Lama. Criticism is allowed, but the second you translate it into Mandarin, so that the common person will be able to read what you say, then they come after you. The ssme is true in Russia. There are many anti-Putin radio stations in St Petersburg, but things like TV Дождь are raided by FSB officials because they talk about corruption in Moscow's business class and the Duma— areas where Putin is active and, if word got out, could threaten his money and power. Joe falls into that category, so I don't think it would be safe for him to come. Unless he has many Western eyes paying attention, forcing Putin to show them "see how safe we are?". Otherwise, he gets a knock on the hotel door in the middle of the night..
    1
  39.  TheGschultz  KGB sexpionage... Our girls are pretty hot though
    1
  40.  @GringoleboZebulon  That's a little melodramatic. I can't speak to whether Putin has a thug mentality, but he is cunning and sly to sure. Make of that what you will. As for criticism, my other comment addresses this. Unfortunately completely free speech is not guaranteed under the law, but generally, if you're not threatening vioence against any government official, you can say whatever you like (de facto). What I totally disagree with is Syria. Assad is absolutely better than ISIS, I can't believe you even considered that. Gassing one's own people in a protest is miles ahead of imposing arbitrary Sharia law and personally going after citizens for their activities. Why don't we ask Libyans how great things are in their country after their leader was killed by US backed agents?
    1
  41.  @nadiamccall4311  Maybe if you stretch the meaning of the word, sure. Money talks. Money is power. Money can buy influence. That doesn't mean it should (especially in areas of political discourse). This is an enormous problem in American politics at the moment and the reason why we have so many structural problems.
    1
  42. Well, aside from the gaping hole in their argument with oxys and benzos, generally the stuff they prescribe you is pure, and you can come back to them (or any other doctor) of you're having trouble with doses. With cheap street drugs, however, you need to know who you're buying from or you could die from a bad batch laced with something lethal. You might be able to sue but you'd be charged with possession too. Basically, there's a guarantee that you don't get something that could kill you no matter how little you take (heroin, fentanyl laced stuff)
    1
  43. This dude reminds me of Kramer from Seinfeld for some reason
    1
  44. Steven Hawking
    1
  45.  @bperez8656  Wolf in sheep's clothing. His positions have moved farther right the longer he's been on tv
    1
  46.  @orion00  No, I'm not. Did you even read my comment?
    1
  47.  @VakKai  Videos that I've already watched don't pique my interest. YouTube's goal is to keep you on the site for as long as possible, so you watch more ads and they get paid by the companies running the ads (because they know it will influence your buying choices later on). Their goal isn't to give you an enjoyable experience, it's to make money.
    1
  48.  @thezerowulf507  It's not harmless to the extent that anything is not harmless— people can become psychologically addicted to anything if the substance or activity fulfills some psychological need. The conservation around legalization is strictly with regards to adverse physical effects— and in that context, Dan's wrong. Period. If we can tolerate a drink with extremely acute effects that can kill someone if too much is ingested, we can tolerate a plant that's impossible to overdose on and very difficult to use so much that it causes physical problems. (You can get too drunk and die in the span of an hour, it takes months to slow down your mental capacity with weed. That's if you smoke like a chimney.)
    1
  49. Socially, sure. But they go much more in-depth on economic and political issues. If you actually took the time to read in full, you'd notice their language is overwhelmingly dry and impartial. Maybe your impression of their whole operation is based on the videos YouTube recommends you? If so, that's really sad, because you're just floating along and taking whatever comes to you, instead of seeking out data-based information.
    1
  50. Yes, depending on the situation. Ex: Conservatives love to rail on San Francisco and its homeless problem, but don't ever stop to think about why. There's a housing shortage, so why not just build more houses? California's standards are higher than the rest of the U.S., but its economy is enormous, so it can afford it. Why doesn't it? Because older liberals and conservatives don't want any new buildings in their neighborhood. It would destroy the "character"— but the bums on the streets doesn't? Idk. Anyway, it's the conservative idea of "not in my backyard!" that's halting development. We could build beautiful high rises or mixed use neighborhoods, but no one wants to take one for the team. So yes is my answer. If people weren't such dicks, we'd make progress from the top down.
    1