Comments by "LancesArmorStriking" (@LancesArmorStriking) on "HasanAbi"
channel.
-
590
-
559
-
124
-
117
-
92
-
77
-
71
-
66
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
60
-
59
-
57
-
55
-
53
-
44
-
41
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
26
-
@nathanlovik1753
Ah yes, the '4D chess' argument. When your figurehead is so stupid that even you can't rationalize their behavior at face value, so you inject it with meaning to compensate.
There is no evidence to suggest that JLP was using the Socratic method here- he doesn't ever hint at a deeper, underlying reason for questioning the way that he does. In fact, he does the opposite:
When Hassan answers his question at 38:19 "Do you think black people are victims?" with "I think black people, just like white people, are all victims of the same system that we live under". He keeps repeating the same question, "I didn't ask about all I only asked about one group" and so on, until they move on.
This isn't Socratic- he isn't questioning assumptions, he's creating them. While I personally do think that black people are victims in a way exclusive to them (court sentencing lengths, policing, weed arrests, all connected to generational wealth)-- if Hasan doesn't think that, JLP needs to accept the answer and move on, or address the underlying disagreement.
His question rests on a false assumption, that Hasan needs to think exactly the way he does.
If Hasan established that he doesn't believe the premise of the question (black people are victims in particular) then JLP needs to prove that the premise is true. Instead of actually questioning the premise, like you're saying, he just keeps going with it.
As for the rest of your gibberish comment, again, I need evidence to suggest that JLP actually thinks that. Does he explicitly say that we're all a part of society, or capitalism? Does he hint at it? I need words from his mouth, not yours.
And you went from one point to another: Dylan Roof shooting up a black church after writing things like "Negroes have lower Iqs, lower impulse control, and higher testosterone levels in generals. These three things alone are a recipe for violent behavior."
That's the definition of racism- thinking that some races are beneath others, or that they're inherently bad.
So, there is "some individuals must be behind the racist or injustice."
Dylann is racist, and he killed black people. Is innocent black people dying not injustice? Is being killed, having members of your family killed by a child not oppressive? I think you proved yourself wrong.
Then you went to power, which is a different argument. You need to stay on track. Even then, you're wrong.
The power to kill innocent people and not be killed on the spot, like Ahmaud Arbery, Eric Garner, or Treyvon Martin, is power. Why do the police not kill him, but kill all those other people? It's because he's white and his family will raise hell if their little 'troubled angel' is killed.
"Is society racist" is exactly the same type of question as "are black people victims"! Too fucking broad!! Which society? Which country? U.S.? Okay, which region? Racist against which group? How, where? Is it legal or illegal?
Why don't you conservatives ever want to being your ideas out of La-La Land and into the real world? Talk about specific places, times, dates.
For fuck's sake. Be specific, for once.
25
-
25
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
That makes Russia no different from the US, then, and I only point this out to ask why, if "international law" is so colossally important to people, did the EU not sanction the US, or the Netherlands stop supplying ASML chips like it has for Russia, to force regime change and policy change.
Why the unequal treatment?
If the answer is "because they're too economically involved in everything", then the principles you're hating Russia for violating cannot be upheld anyway, so the question returns to, why risk it this time, but not in 2003 or 2011?
22
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17