Comments by "Jacob\x27s *HEX* Ladder" (@jacobshexladder) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. @Richard Trischka has no math skills hahahaha My math is 💯 percent correct. You have to believe in theoretical magical levitating refraction to explain away the Flat Earth. It's actually hilarious!!! 10% of the mountain is observed or whatever nonsense you'll claim?? Haha get your eyes checked and don't make up nonsense. It's more like 100%! It sure doesn't matter anyways because the mountain shouldn't even be visible. The TOP of the mountain should be anywhere from 3,716.3562 to 10,928.1469 ft BELOW HORIZON. THAT puts the ENTIRE MOUNTAIN 3.12 TO 4.52 MILES BELOW HORIZON. YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN MAGICAL LEVITATING REFRACTION BENDING AND LEVITATING OBJECTS AROUND A BALL TO EXCUSE AWAY THE FACT THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT. LIKE I SAID TO OTHER BALL GOBBLERS BELIEVE IN YOUR THEORIES IF IT HELPS YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT.
    2
  2. @Richard Trischka is confused. Here's how I found out the Earth (for as long any telescopic lense can zoom) is FLATTER THAN A PANCAKE. and here's what you must do ... 1. Take any long distance photograph. 2. Write down the distance between mountains. 3. Write down the heights of both mountains. 4. Calculate DISTANCE TO HORIZON. 5. Calculate TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT. That's how I found the Earth (for as long any telescopic lense can zoom) is FLATTER THAN A PANCAKE ... and that's how my opinion matters ... and that's how YOU CAN FIND OUT. DO THIS ... Than your opinion might MATTER!
    2
  3. @Richard Trischka is confused bahaha of course REFRACTION exists silly girl but it sure can't magically levitate COMPLETELY HIDDEN OBJECTS 4 miles into the air and AROUND A BALL, you SILLY girl! Keywords for you = 'COMPLETELY HIDDEN' and 'AROUND a BALL.' UNFORTUNATELY FOR YOU KIDDO THE WORLD RECORD observation is ALREADY COMPLETELY HIDDEN and NOT just COMPLETELY HIDDEN ... lets NOT forget BELOW THE HORIZON. Like I said you can't apply a refraction coefficient to an object that is already COMPLETELY HIDDEN and BELOW THE HORIZON.
    2
  4. @Richard Trischka has no math skills. Unfortunately you can't apply your silly nonsensical refraction coefficient that increases Earths RADIUS from 3,959 to 4,618.83 to a mountain that is already out of VIEW and LET'S NOT FORGET miles BELOW THE HORIZON. You can ONLY attempt to play with those silly numbers if the mountain is still in view. UNFORTUNATELY for you simple high school geometry and The World Record For Long Distance Photography have already proven the Earth to be flatter than a pancake.
    2
  5.  Ocasio-Cortez4prez2022  is dumb Science BALLOONS are BETTER than THEORETICAL science SATELLITES. Here's a clip from SCIENCE MAGAZINE. https://youtu.be/qBX2xYWHyro Here's a clip from NASA https://youtu.be/hK_kWN0BsKs Here's a clip from THE SIMPSON'S https://youtu.be/fZw2S8z22CI
    2
  6.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  is dumb too I'm trying to help you not make a fool of yourself again. Here I'll make it real easy for you since simple high school geometry is OBVIOUSLY not your strong point. 1. Go to your refraction calculator (METABUNK) copy and paste the calculations to this comment thread. 2. I will then HIGHLIGHT where your YOUR DELUSIONAL CALCULATOR increases THE SIZE OF EARTH BY 4,618.83 MILES by adding a multiplier to the radius of EARTH. Please do this for me. I really love ending my night with a laugh. Remember kiddo ... OPIONIINS do NOT = PROOF OF ANYTHING NO CURVE = FLAT EARTH!!
    2
  7.  @dubbled7286  is obsessed with massive balls.
    2
  8.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  haha you newbie. Of course the Sun appears SMALLER the further it gets from your vision. It's called perspective and a vanishing point. Which works INCREDIBLY PERFECT ONLY ON A FLAT EARTH. BAHAHA you BUFFOON. https://youtu.be/e1TUpNkHcAM https://youtu.be/IUmhLaYPrX0 Ouch that must hurt ... Haha
    2
  9.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  Easy the sun is just a small reflected light source.
    2
  10.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  Eclipses prove that the Sun and Moon are exactly the same size.
    2
  11.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  hates life now. Before you can have an OPINION about a LIGHT in the sky. 1. You must FIRST prove that light in the sky is an actual physical object. 2. You must prove the Sun is ACTUALLY bigger than the Moon. 3. You must prove the Sun is 93,000,000 miles further away than the Moon!
    2
  12.  Ocasio-Cortez4prez2022  is confused because she's obsessed with massive balls.
    2
  13.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  feels dumb. That's adorable this guy still believes a ball is the only geometric shape that will create a curved shadow on another ball. How old are you again?? Why would a curved edge on the face of the moon prove we live on a magical levitating spinning ball? You do realize other shapes; for example a rectangle will also create a curved shadow on a ball. hahaha The ball itself is was creates the curve. Sorry kiddo you obviously don't have a clue how shadows actually works on a ball. You just proved your stupidity. Ahaha that was debunked centuries ago. Shadows on the moon have no correlation or relevance to the geometry of an object you're standing on. Hahaha the fact that this idiot thinks he can determine the geometry of the object he stands on by looking at lights in the sky ... Proves his stupidity.!
    2
  14.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  hates being my personal DUMBO. If you want to talk about lights in the sky and think they prove the Earth is a globe. Let's do it. Time lapse Star trail parallax is not observed = galactic theory debunked Polaris never moves = galactic theory and the theory that Earth supposedly moves in four different directions debunked Sun and Moon are EXACTLY THE SAME SIZE. When observed both make circular revolutions above observer. The only thing telling you that the Sun is further away than the Moon is theoretical science. How do you KNOW one is further away than the other? By observation alone and not theology both are = distance from observer. Not to mention EVERYONE on Earth only ever sees ONE FLAT side of the Moon. HOW does this = observation by every person on Earth make the Moon a ball?? It doesn't, only theology can hypothesize that. oh well ... NO CURVE = THEORETICAL RADIUS OF EARTH DEBUNKED = ORBITAL SCIENCE DEBUNKED = NO THEORETICAL MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL = GLOBE MODEL/MAP DEBUNKED = SPACE DEBUNKED = FLAT EARTH
    2
  15.  @cthulhuhasrisen1009  is stuck Haha and yet you still haven't learned ANYTHING!!! No measured curve = NO GLOBE MAP/MODEL BAHAHA You do realize all maps are projections. Haha not sure how you expect to fit the Flat Earth on your imaginary ball map. Maybe you should check out the U.N. logo. A much better projection and of course the reason why ... 1. THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 2. THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION 3. THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 4. THE INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ... ALL use the same FLAT EARTH MAP!!
    2
  16. @Melburys Brick Unfortunately lights in the sky have no bearing whatsoever on the geometry of the object you're standing on. Oh well.
    2
  17. @kalle kanin Himawari has been debunked you newbie. https://youtu.be/vwySa52tRlo
    2
  18.  @squizzo5809  is confused Please supply video evidence that Polaris moves a degree EVERY few hundred years. If the government is your PROOF than you're in real trouble. BAHAHA you BUFFOON Please keep responding your stupidity is hilarious! Polaris NEVER moves = THAT'S why is called the FIXED STAR BAHAHA YOU BUFFOON
    2
  19.  @squizzo5809  feels dumb Unfortunately for you ... Polaris never moves. Unfortunately for you ... According to the galactic theory the Earth constantly moves in 4 different directions within the theoretical galaxy and the stars closer to the galactic center move much much faster than the stars in the outer edges of your theoretical Galaxy. Within this theory the only visible stars in our night sky are the ones in your theoretical galaxy. Because of this the distance of stars is irrelevant. Visible time lapse star trail parallax would be inevitable. The stars would be CONSTANTLY MOVING thus never having the same constellations on a daily basis AND THEY WOULD NEVER rotate in perfect circles around the stationary and NEVER MOVING Polaris ... ... that is, if we lived on your theoretical magical levitating spinning wet ball.
    2
  20.  @squizzo5809  has no math skills. Metabunk is a BLOG and Mick West made up a nonexistent constant for refraction. Others have done the same, just copied and pasted his nonsense to their own blogs. He's NOT a scientist or mathematician ... He's JUST a silly butthurt blogger.  Refraction wouldn't have anything to do with this observation. Plus a constant for refraction is nonsensical. REFRACTION is totally dependent on temperature and temperature varies every 1/8 of a mile. I'm glad to know where you source your intelligence!! Haha So NO!! Sorry Metabunk's "calculator" is not a REAL CALCULATOR! Any calculator that uses a "STANDARD" FOR REFRACTION is NOT a REAL CALCULATOR. A STANDARD FOR REFRACTION DOES NOT EXIST!! HAHAHA HILARIOUS Nice try KIDDO. You moron metabunk uses my math. Mick West the blogger that runs that blog just increased the EARTH'S size by 1/6 by adding a nonexistent multiplier. STRAIGHT UP CON MAN. Haha you just proved that simple high school geometry is too difficult for you.
    2
  21.  @squizzo5809  feels really dumb Yes MY MATH is perfect for a parabola that 100% accurately curves around a ball up to 1,200 miles with a radius of 3,959 miles. Thanks for proving that you have no math skills and have no idea what you're talking about 😂.
    2
  22.  @amang1001  No fighter pilots are not in on it. You can't see a curve from a plane dumb dumb.
    2
  23.  @sumeahsking8019  is sad because she's obsessed with massive balls and magical poles. If you dumb dumbs think I'm wrong please supply the necessary calculations worked out in their entirety and than we'll compare. Untill than you're just silly ball GOBBLERS with nonsensical opinion pieces.
    2
  24.  Ocasio-Cortez4prez2022  feels dumb. You moron metabunk uses my math. Mick West the blogger that runs that blog just increased the EARTH'S size by 1/6 by adding a nonexistent multiplier. STRAIGHT UP CON MAN. Haha you just proved that simple high school geometry is too difficult for you.
    2
  25.  @squizzo5809  is confused. Of course I'm not using 8 in per mile squared. That's ONLY for sea level. I'm using 2 confirmed geometric equations that work perfectly on a ball with a radius of only 3,959 miles. It works perfectly up to 1,200 miles dumb dumb dumb. I'm using 2 confirmed equations from mainstream geometry. 1. Distance to Horizon 2. Target HIDDEN HEIGHT
    2
  26.  @squizzo5809  has no math skills 😄 Sorry kiddo but you don't understand what a parabola is. It's just an arc or PART OF A CIRCLE. No sorry MY MATH is 💯% accurate up to 1,200 miles around a ball with a radius of 3,959 miles. The first mile is accurate and EVERY mile after that up to 1,200 miles. Only after does it than begin to deviate. But after 275 miles it doesn't matter. Which let me remind is well over The World Record for Long Distance Photograph (275 miles) ... It's hilarious that you think your opinion matters because this ENTIRE THREAD still hasn't seen a single worked out calculation completed in it's entirety. If you think your silly worthless opinion matters please supply completed equations for ... 1. Distance to Horizon And 2. Target HIDDEN Height Than you WORTHLESS delusional SILLY opinion might matter. Please keep responding 🙏!!!
    2
  27.  @squizzo5809  = 😭 Yes of course all the controlled government's are in on it. It's called the ANTARCTIC TREATY you dumb dumb 😂.
    2
  28.  @squizzo5809  wishes he had math skills ... and LET'S NOT FORGET the 2nd simpleton equation. so ... bahahahaha and TO DETERMINE TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT all you need is ... 1. TARGET DISTANCE = 275 MILES 2. DISTANCE to HORIZON = 117.930380 MILES 3. RADIUS = 3,959.00 MILES ______ 2. TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT = (square root((target distance - distance to horizon)squared + R squared)) - R (square root((275mi - 117.93040mi)squared + 3959mi squared)) - 3959mi = 3.1145670 MILES _______ 3.114570 MILES!!!! = 16,444.930 FEET BELOW THE HORIZON!!! BAHAHA HAHA TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT = 16,444.930 ft Thanks again for proving that simple high school geometry is too difficult for you. HAHAHA
    2
  29.  @sumeahsking8019  Haha you're sooooooo smart
    2
  30.  @sumeahsking8019  feels left out ... Hey if people want to believe your nonsensical gibberish/theories that will NEVER BE PROVEN or DEMONSTRATED ... I will ONLY applaud at their conformity/hypnosis/herd mentality!
    2
  31.  @sumeahsking8019  feels very sad Mainstream science and spherical geometry (based on a Planet with ONLY A RADIUS OF 3,959 MILES) says a curve should be visible at a height of 20km/65,000 ft ... here's the reality. No visible curve at 35,000 ft from commercial airline. No visible curve at 125,000 ft from weather balloon. No visible curve at 393,700 ft from amateur rocket launches. No visible curve from World Record Long Distance Photography a 275 mile observation. That is a distance that is the equivalent stretch between Los Angeles to Las Vegas. No curve = Flat Earth Go troll somewhere else! Its hilarious!! The ONLY PREREQUISITE for your MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL MAP is your MAGICAL CURVE. NO CURVE WHATSOEVER = NO GLOBE MAP/MODEL = FLAT EARTH
    2
  32.  Ocasio-Cortez4prez2022  = 😭 Haha and yet you still haven't learned ANYTHING!!! No measured curve = NO GLOBE MAP/MODEL BAHAHA You do realize all maps are projections. Haha not sure how you expect to fit the Flat Earth on your imaginary ball map. Maybe you should check out the U.N. logo. A much better projection and of course the reason why ... 1. THE INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATION 2. THE WORLD METEOROLOGICAL ORGANIZATION 3. THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION 4. THE INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ... ALL use the same FLAT EARTH MAP!!
    2
  33.  @sumeahsking8019  is desperate Yeah I definitely think the educational system has failed. You guys are morons. You guys just proved YOUR STUPIDITY and EXPOSED YOURSELVES, simple high school geometry is JUST too difficult for you. HAHAHA HILARIOUS please keep responding!
    2
  34.  matt white  Wow still waiting on your proof/scaled down model that refraction can magically levitate COMPLETELY HIDDEN objects from BELOW THE HORIZON and up into THE AIR AND AROUND A BALL. Key words COMPLETELY HIDDEN and AROUND BAHAHA wow still waiting for your worked out calculations for ... DISTANCE TO HORIZON and TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT. REMEMBER kiddo OPINIONS do not magically levitate a COMPLETELY HIDDEN OBJECT miles into the air and around a wet magical levitating spinning theoretical ball.
    2
  35.  Ocasio-Cortez4prez2022  is lost Hey if you want to prove your theory that objects can bend and magically levitate around a ball. Here's a simple experiment ... ... Since we live inside an atmosphere the conditions should be perfect for you. 1. Grab a basketball. (which will represent a scaled down model of your THEORETICAL Spinning Ball) 2. Tape a circle around the ball separating both halves of the ball. 3. Tape and center a small figurine on one side. 4. Turn off the lights and shine a flash light on the side opposite of the figurine. 5. Video tape it. Let me know if refraction flattens out the ball to bring the figurine into view. Ahahahaha Maybe this experiment will put into perspective your nonsensical claims and limitless delusional capabilities of refraction!
    2
  36.  matt white  has nothing to add. Haha wait have you been to the center of EARTH to prove the existence of your theoretical MASSIVE IRON CORE or the MASSIVE 1,800 MILE WIDE/DEEP MANTLE that's creating and IS THEORETICALLY RESPONSIBLE for most of your theoretical GRAVITY? EARTH'S Mantle THEORETICALLY starts about 25 MILES deep and continues for about 1,800 miles. The mantle occupies 84 percent of Earths mass. You must first PROVE that the mantle EXISTS. THE deepest hole ever dug was 8 miles!! That's along way from 3,959 miles!! Haha You can't try and prove a theory with another THEORY. HAHAHA You silly child. BAHAHAHA BAHAHA
    2
  37.  @squizzo5809  is confused. Of course I'm not using 8 in per mile squared. That's ONLY for sea level. I'm using 2 confirmed geometric equations that work perfectly on a ball with a radius of only 3059 miles. It works perfectly up to 1200 miles dumb dumb dumb. I'm using 2 confirmed equations from mainstream geometry. 1. Distance to Horizon 2. Target HIDDEN HEIGHT
    2
  38.  @justinwainwright5069  is mad I would LOVE to see actual CALCULATIONS WRITTEN OUT. Just saying you need to increase EARTH'S RADIUS by 659.83 MILES IS DELUSIONAL. You losers ONLY HAVE PROVEN THAT THE EARTH NEEDS TO BE 4,120 MILES BIGGER FOR THE WORLD RECORD FOR LONG DISTANCE PHOTOGRAPHY TO WORK ON YOUR MAGICAL LEVITATING SPINNING BALL. HERE'S WHAT I NEED TO SEE IF YOU THINK YOUR OPINION MATTERS!! BAHAHAHAHAHA 1. I need to see THE DISTANCE TO HORIZON calculation WORKED out IN ITS ENTIRETY!! 2. I need to see THE TARGET HIDDEN HEIGHT calculation WORKED out IN ITS ENTIRETY!! GOOD LUCK I'LL BE WAITING!! HAHA PLEASE KEEP RESPONDING YOUR STUPIDITY IS HILARIOUS!!
    2
  39.  @justinwainwright5069  is just sad because she's obsessed with massive balls and magical poles.
    2
  40.  @justinwainwright5069  is mad because she has no math skills.
    2
  41.  @justinwainwright5069  wishes she had math skills.
    2
  42.  @justinwainwright5069  hates being my personal DUMBO.
    2
  43.  @justinwainwright5069  hates life .
    2
  44.  @justinwainwright5069  is scared of puberty.
    2
  45.  @justinwainwright5069  hates being dumb 💕 massive balls Please prove that everything off in the distance is an illusion. That's a wild and SILLY 😂 claim ...
    2
  46.  @justinwainwright5069  has no math skills so she has to deflect
    2
  47.  @justinwainwright5069  hates that the Earth is obviously flatter than a pancake
    2
  48.  @justinwainwright5069  has no math skills
    2
  49.  @1966-k3z  is confused Wow cute opinion!! Unfortunately after skimming I didn't see the NECESSARY calculations to prove me wrong. Haha not SURPRISED!!!!!
    2
  50.  @1966-k3z  is very sad 😭 I hope you get over your obsession. Being obsessed with massive balls and magical poles couldn't be healthy. Feel better soon 😷🙏.
    2