Comments by "Michael Lenczewski" (@kayakMike1000) on "The Hill"
channel.
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@LastBref dude, seriously, p51abc was pointing out a significant flaw and symbol of some pretty serious disingenuous statements. Also, he never made a claim that he intended to address the substance of Brianna's argument. I think its a valid observation that she was claiming to be neutral on Musk, but she has maligned him on other occasions. This speaks poorly of her character. Also, you ended up being guilty of the same thing you're accusing the original poster, you're not acknowledging his original argument and you're jumping to a conclusion that the op is an Elon fan.
Watch this for you. I was hopeful that Elon would make Twitter a free place to speak. It seems he's faltering since he is not the CEO anymore. Maybe they will get this straightened out eventually, but killing twitter is not a great business plan. It seems to be a little better than before.
So, I'm partly in agreement with Brianna, but I find her characterization of the situation hypocritical and disingenuous. She claimed to be neutral on Elon Musk but we have all heard her malign his character in the past and accuse him of behavior that was unbecoming of a business man. I expect Brianna to present her analysis and opinions in a way befitting a reasonable show host, to which, she seems unqualified.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5